Resection zone prediction for parenchyma-sparing hepatectomy planning: a comparative study of three modeling paradigms.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Janine Rothert, Joy Rakshit, Judith L Salz, Florentine Huettl, Viola Ehses, Tobias Huber, Hauke Lang, Sylvia Saalfeld, Georg Hille
{"title":"Resection zone prediction for parenchyma-sparing hepatectomy planning: a comparative study of three modeling paradigms.","authors":"Janine Rothert, Joy Rakshit, Judith L Salz, Florentine Huettl, Viola Ehses, Tobias Huber, Hauke Lang, Sylvia Saalfeld, Georg Hille","doi":"10.1007/s11548-026-03798-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Parenchyma-sparing hepatectomy planning depends on accurate resection zones that preserve functional liver tissue without compromising oncological margins. This work investigates how different levels of anatomical and functional information complexity influence resection zone prediction for parenchyma-sparing surgical planning for primary liver cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compare three modeling paradigms: a geometric distance-based approach, an explicit perfusion-based method using vascular anatomy, and a deep learning-based model built on the U-Net architecture. All methods operate on segmentation-derived representations of the liver, tumor, and vessels. Performance is evaluated using overlap- and distance-based metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The distance-based model produces predictions with limited surface deviation (HD <math><mmultiscripts><mrow></mrow> <mn>95</mn> <mrow></mrow></mmultiscripts> </math> 33.89  mm) but lower overlap due to undersegmentation (DSC 58.18 %). The perfusion-based method achieves a favorable balance between overlap (DSC 67.41 %) and boundary accuracy (HD <math><mmultiscripts><mrow></mrow> <mn>95</mn> <mrow></mrow></mmultiscripts> </math> 37.92  mm) but tends to overestimate the predicted region due to strict binary perfusion assumptions. The deep learning model attains the highest overlap accuracy (DSC 76.31 %) while exhibiting larger distance errors (HD <math><mmultiscripts><mrow></mrow> <mn>95</mn> <mrow></mrow></mmultiscripts> </math> 65.21  mm), reflecting localized boundary inaccuracies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>None of the models is universally outperforming the other two for parenchyma-sparing resection planning. Deep learning shows strong predictive performance, particularly for larger resection volumes, while geometric and perfusion-based models offer greater interpretability and clinical controllability. The distance-based approach is well suited for maximal parenchyma-sparing resections, whereas perfusion-based modeling is advantageous for tumors near vessels with potential perfusion loss. Our results highlight variations due to different surgical strategies and can thus provide valuable guidance for individual patient's surgery planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":51251,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-026-03798-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Parenchyma-sparing hepatectomy planning depends on accurate resection zones that preserve functional liver tissue without compromising oncological margins. This work investigates how different levels of anatomical and functional information complexity influence resection zone prediction for parenchyma-sparing surgical planning for primary liver cancer.

Methods: We compare three modeling paradigms: a geometric distance-based approach, an explicit perfusion-based method using vascular anatomy, and a deep learning-based model built on the U-Net architecture. All methods operate on segmentation-derived representations of the liver, tumor, and vessels. Performance is evaluated using overlap- and distance-based metrics.

Results: The distance-based model produces predictions with limited surface deviation (HD 95 33.89  mm) but lower overlap due to undersegmentation (DSC 58.18 %). The perfusion-based method achieves a favorable balance between overlap (DSC 67.41 %) and boundary accuracy (HD 95 37.92  mm) but tends to overestimate the predicted region due to strict binary perfusion assumptions. The deep learning model attains the highest overlap accuracy (DSC 76.31 %) while exhibiting larger distance errors (HD 95 65.21  mm), reflecting localized boundary inaccuracies.

Conclusion: None of the models is universally outperforming the other two for parenchyma-sparing resection planning. Deep learning shows strong predictive performance, particularly for larger resection volumes, while geometric and perfusion-based models offer greater interpretability and clinical controllability. The distance-based approach is well suited for maximal parenchyma-sparing resections, whereas perfusion-based modeling is advantageous for tumors near vessels with potential perfusion loss. Our results highlight variations due to different surgical strategies and can thus provide valuable guidance for individual patient's surgery planning.

保留实质肝切除计划的切除区域预测:三种建模范式的比较研究。
目的:保留肝实质的肝切除术计划依赖于准确的切除区域,在不损害肿瘤边缘的情况下保留功能肝组织。本研究探讨了不同水平的解剖和功能信息复杂性对原发性肝癌保留实质手术计划切除区域预测的影响。方法:我们比较了三种建模范式:基于几何距离的方法,基于血管解剖的显式灌注方法,以及基于U-Net架构的基于深度学习的模型。所有的方法都是基于肝脏、肿瘤和血管的分割。使用基于重叠和距离的度量来评估性能。结果:基于距离的模型产生的预测具有有限的表面偏差(HD 95 33.89 mm),但由于分割不足导致的重叠较低(DSC 58.18%)。基于灌注的方法在重叠(DSC 67.41%)和边界精度(hd95 37.92 mm)之间取得了良好的平衡,但由于严格的二元灌注假设,往往会高估预测区域。深度学习模型获得了最高的重叠精度(DSC 76.31%),但显示出较大的距离误差(HD 95 65.21 mm),反映了局部边界的不准确性。结论:在保留肺实质的切除计划中,没有一种模型能普遍优于其他两种模型。深度学习显示出强大的预测性能,特别是对于更大的切除体积,而几何模型和基于灌注的模型提供了更好的可解释性和临床可控性。基于距离的方法非常适合最大限度保留实质的切除,而基于灌注的建模则有利于血管附近有潜在灌注损失的肿瘤。我们的结果强调了不同手术策略的差异,因此可以为个体患者的手术计划提供有价值的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
243
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (IJCARS) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a platform for closing the gap between medical and technical disciplines, and encourages interdisciplinary research and development activities in an international environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书