The destabilizing effect of cervical foraminotomy - an ex vivo biomechanical study.

IF 5.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anna-Katharina Calek, Alexandra Stauffer, Marie-Rosa Fasser, Jana F Schader, Anna M Schuler, Alexandra Grob, Mazda Farshad, Jonas Widmer, José M Spirig
{"title":"The destabilizing effect of cervical foraminotomy - an ex vivo biomechanical study.","authors":"Anna-Katharina Calek, Alexandra Stauffer, Marie-Rosa Fasser, Jana F Schader, Anna M Schuler, Alexandra Grob, Mazda Farshad, Jonas Widmer, José M Spirig","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2026.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Context Posterior cervical foraminotomy is a minimally invasive, motion-preserving treatment for cervical radiculopathy. However, surgeons still rely on the traditional \"50% rule\" for facet resection despite limited biomechanical evidence supporting this threshold. Purpose To evaluate the biomechanical effects of graded unilateral facet joint resection (10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 100%) compared with the native state. Study Design Cadaveric biomechanical study Methods Nine cervical segments from five fresh-frozen cadavers were tested under load control. Segmental ROM was assessed in the native state and after 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% facet resection in flexion-extension (FE), lateral shear (LS), lateral bending (LB), anteroposterior shear (AS), and axial rotation (AR). Results ROM increased in all directions with progressive facet (and adjacent capsular) resection. Significant changes were observed at 25% resection (native vs. 25%): AR, 1.8° vs. 2.7°; FE, 7.1° vs. 8.6°; and LS, 0.6 mm vs. 0.6 mm (all p<0.05). Beyond 50% resection, FE, LS, and AS largely plateaued. AR showed the greatest increase in ROM, reaching 45% and 71% above the native condition after 75% and 100% resection, respectively (p<0.05). Conclusion Unilateral cervical foraminotomy caused progressive, motion-specific destabilization, most pronounced in AR, followed by LB. Significant changes occurred within the first 25% of resection. Beyond 50%, FE, LS, and AS plateaued, whereas AR continued to increase without a discrete threshold. Clinical significance: These findings support minimizing facet and capsular disruption and challenge the 50% rule as a universal biomechanical safety threshold.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2026.10.001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Context Posterior cervical foraminotomy is a minimally invasive, motion-preserving treatment for cervical radiculopathy. However, surgeons still rely on the traditional "50% rule" for facet resection despite limited biomechanical evidence supporting this threshold. Purpose To evaluate the biomechanical effects of graded unilateral facet joint resection (10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 100%) compared with the native state. Study Design Cadaveric biomechanical study Methods Nine cervical segments from five fresh-frozen cadavers were tested under load control. Segmental ROM was assessed in the native state and after 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% facet resection in flexion-extension (FE), lateral shear (LS), lateral bending (LB), anteroposterior shear (AS), and axial rotation (AR). Results ROM increased in all directions with progressive facet (and adjacent capsular) resection. Significant changes were observed at 25% resection (native vs. 25%): AR, 1.8° vs. 2.7°; FE, 7.1° vs. 8.6°; and LS, 0.6 mm vs. 0.6 mm (all p<0.05). Beyond 50% resection, FE, LS, and AS largely plateaued. AR showed the greatest increase in ROM, reaching 45% and 71% above the native condition after 75% and 100% resection, respectively (p<0.05). Conclusion Unilateral cervical foraminotomy caused progressive, motion-specific destabilization, most pronounced in AR, followed by LB. Significant changes occurred within the first 25% of resection. Beyond 50%, FE, LS, and AS plateaued, whereas AR continued to increase without a discrete threshold. Clinical significance: These findings support minimizing facet and capsular disruption and challenge the 50% rule as a universal biomechanical safety threshold.

颈椎椎间孔切开术的不稳定效应——一项离体生物力学研究。
背景:后路颈椎椎间孔切开术是一种微创、保运动治疗颈椎神经根病的方法。然而,尽管有限的生物力学证据支持这一阈值,外科医生仍然依赖传统的“50%规则”进行小关节突切除术。目的评价单侧小关节梯度切除(10%、25%、50%、75%、100%)与原位状态的生物力学效果。研究设计尸体生物力学研究方法对5具新鲜冷冻尸体的9个颈椎节段进行负荷控制试验。在原始状态和10%、25%、50%、75%和100%关节突切除后,在屈伸(FE)、侧向剪切(LS)、侧向弯曲(LB)、前后剪切(AS)和轴向旋转(AR)中评估节段性ROM。结果渐进式关节突(及邻近关节囊)切除术后,关节内ROM均增加。25%切除时观察到显著变化(原生vs 25%): AR, 1.8°vs. 2.7°;FE, 7.1°vs. 8.6°;LS, 0.6 mm vs. 0.6 mm(均p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书