[Comparison of counselling statistics of the Single Points of Contact for Employers (EAA) across the German federal states].

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2026-10-07 DOI:10.1055/a-2940-0206
Sarah Lamb, Sarah Schulze, Bastian Pelka, Jörg-Tobias Kuhn, Jana York
{"title":"[Comparison of counselling statistics of the Single Points of Contact for Employers (EAA) across the German federal states].","authors":"Sarah Lamb, Sarah Schulze, Bastian Pelka, Jörg-Tobias Kuhn, Jana York","doi":"10.1055/a-2940-0206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In 2022, lawmakers established the Single Points of Contact for Employers (§185a SGB IX) across Germany with the aim of improving opportunities for people with disabilities to particpate in the labor market. The EAA are intended to inform, advise, and support employers on issues related to disability and work. The EAA's funding and employment structures differ considerably between the federal states. The aim of this article was to compare the EAA's counseling figures across the various federal states and to identify opportunities for further developing the EAA's case data documentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Methodologically, the study followed a multi-method design combining descriptive analyses of state-level EAA case data for the 2024 reporting period with guided expert interviews. In addition, the findings were discussed with EAA experts in a participatory dialogues.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed substantial differences between the federal states in terms of documented contact occasions. These differences can be attributed to variyng interpretation of key terms and documentation practices, different employment situations and prior structures as well as heterogeneous provider structures.</p><p><strong>Conlusion: </strong>The EAA case documentation offers opportunities for a targeted management of this new labor market policy instrument. Documentation should be further standardized across federal states in order to enhance comparability. Nevertheless, each federal state should formulate individual (sub)goals, taking into account its own conditions and specificities.</p>","PeriodicalId":54504,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2940-0206","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In 2022, lawmakers established the Single Points of Contact for Employers (§185a SGB IX) across Germany with the aim of improving opportunities for people with disabilities to particpate in the labor market. The EAA are intended to inform, advise, and support employers on issues related to disability and work. The EAA's funding and employment structures differ considerably between the federal states. The aim of this article was to compare the EAA's counseling figures across the various federal states and to identify opportunities for further developing the EAA's case data documentation.

Methods: Methodologically, the study followed a multi-method design combining descriptive analyses of state-level EAA case data for the 2024 reporting period with guided expert interviews. In addition, the findings were discussed with EAA experts in a participatory dialogues.

Results: The results showed substantial differences between the federal states in terms of documented contact occasions. These differences can be attributed to variyng interpretation of key terms and documentation practices, different employment situations and prior structures as well as heterogeneous provider structures.

Conlusion: The EAA case documentation offers opportunities for a targeted management of this new labor market policy instrument. Documentation should be further standardized across federal states in order to enhance comparability. Nevertheless, each federal state should formulate individual (sub)goals, taking into account its own conditions and specificities.

[德国联邦各州雇主单一联络点(EAA)的咨询统计比较]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift Die Rehabilitation richtet sich an Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter in Einrichtungen, Forschungsinstitutionen und Trägern der Rehabilitation. Sie berichtet über die medizinischen, gesetzlichen, politischen und gesellschaftlichen Grundlagen und Rahmenbedingungen der Rehabilitation und über internationale Entwicklungen auf diesem Gebiet. Schwerpunkte sind dabei Beiträge zu Rehabilitationspraxis (medizinische, berufliche und soziale Rehabilitation, Qualitätsmanagement, neue Konzepte und Versorgungsmodelle zur Anwendung der ICF, Bewegungstherapie etc.), Rehabilitationsforschung (praxisrelevante Ergebnisse, Methoden und Assessments, Leitlinienentwicklung, sozialmedizinische Fragen), Public Health, Sozialmedizin Gesundheits-System-Forschung sowie die daraus resultierenden Probleme.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书