Role of extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with colorectal neoplasia who underwent minimally invasive colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Nouf AlMarzooqi, Laurence Robert, Liane S Feldman, Sender Liberman, Lawrence Lee
{"title":"Role of extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with colorectal neoplasia who underwent minimally invasive colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol.","authors":"Nouf AlMarzooqi, Laurence Robert, Liane S Feldman, Sender Liberman, Lawrence Lee","doi":"10.1007/s00464-026-13445-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with colorectal cancer are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to malignancy-associated hypercoagulability and the physiologic stress of surgery. Current guidelines recommend extended-duration thromboprophylaxis for up to 28 days following major abdominal or pelvic cancer surgery. However, its effectiveness in patients managed by Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways is uncertain. This study evaluated the effectiveness of extended thromboprophylaxis after minimally invasive colorectal resection managed within a mature ERAS program in reducing clinically significant VTE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted including all adult patients undergoing elective minimally invasive colorectal resection for neoplasia at a high-volume Canadian academic centre between 01/2016 and 12/2024. Patients undergoing open surgery, emergency procedures, or receiving therapeutic anticoagulation were excluded. All patients received standard in-hospital thromboprophylaxis. Extended thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin 5000 U for 28 days post-discharge was provided at the physician's discretion before 03/2018 and was subsequently included in the ERAS protocol. The primary outcome was symptomatic post-discharge VTE within 30 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes included bleeding complications, length of stay, emergency department visits, and readmissions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1043 included in the primary analysis after excluding inpatient VTE events (n=351 patients did not receive extended prophylaxis, n=692 received extended prophylaxis). The incidence of post-discharge VTE was 0.5% (6/1043). There was a higher incidence of VTEs in the -eDVTp group compared to the +eDVTp group [5/351(1.4%) vs. 1/692 (0.1%), p=0.010]. Post-discharge VTE was significantly higher in patients who did not receive extended prophylaxis compared with those who did (1.4% vs. 0.1%, p = 0.010). There were no significant differences in overall or clinically significant bleeding between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal resection within a mature ERAS pathway, the incidence of symptomatic post-discharge VTE is very low. Although extended thromboprophylaxis was associated with a statistically significant reduction in VTE events, the absolute risk reduction was small.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-026-13445-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with colorectal cancer are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to malignancy-associated hypercoagulability and the physiologic stress of surgery. Current guidelines recommend extended-duration thromboprophylaxis for up to 28 days following major abdominal or pelvic cancer surgery. However, its effectiveness in patients managed by Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways is uncertain. This study evaluated the effectiveness of extended thromboprophylaxis after minimally invasive colorectal resection managed within a mature ERAS program in reducing clinically significant VTE.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted including all adult patients undergoing elective minimally invasive colorectal resection for neoplasia at a high-volume Canadian academic centre between 01/2016 and 12/2024. Patients undergoing open surgery, emergency procedures, or receiving therapeutic anticoagulation were excluded. All patients received standard in-hospital thromboprophylaxis. Extended thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin 5000 U for 28 days post-discharge was provided at the physician's discretion before 03/2018 and was subsequently included in the ERAS protocol. The primary outcome was symptomatic post-discharge VTE within 30 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes included bleeding complications, length of stay, emergency department visits, and readmissions.

Results: A total of 1043 included in the primary analysis after excluding inpatient VTE events (n=351 patients did not receive extended prophylaxis, n=692 received extended prophylaxis). The incidence of post-discharge VTE was 0.5% (6/1043). There was a higher incidence of VTEs in the -eDVTp group compared to the +eDVTp group [5/351(1.4%) vs. 1/692 (0.1%), p=0.010]. Post-discharge VTE was significantly higher in patients who did not receive extended prophylaxis compared with those who did (1.4% vs. 0.1%, p = 0.010). There were no significant differences in overall or clinically significant bleeding between groups.

Conclusions: In patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal resection within a mature ERAS pathway, the incidence of symptomatic post-discharge VTE is very low. Although extended thromboprophylaxis was associated with a statistically significant reduction in VTE events, the absolute risk reduction was small.

扩大静脉血栓栓塞预防在结肠直肠癌患者中所起的作用,这些患者接受了微创结肠直肠癌手术,术后恢复更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书