Comparative analysis of novel vertebral bone quality score variants for predicting cage subsidence following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Omar Lubbad, Laila Lubbad, Nour Jaouni, Omar Hamed, Akram Hagos, Cameron Bicknell, Suzanne Murphy, Nektarios K Mazarakis
{"title":"Comparative analysis of novel vertebral bone quality score variants for predicting cage subsidence following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Omar Lubbad, Laila Lubbad, Nour Jaouni, Omar Hamed, Akram Hagos, Cameron Bicknell, Suzanne Murphy, Nektarios K Mazarakis","doi":"10.1007/s00586-026-10418-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several modifications of the MRI-derived vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score have been proposed to improve assessment of vertebral bone quality, including anterior-modified, posterior-modified, calibrated, and T2-weighted adaptations. However, these methodologies have not been systematically evaluated in the cervical spine. This study compared the performance of VBQ-derived metrics for predicting cage subsidence following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing single-level ACDF with preoperative MRI and postoperative radiographic follow-up were retrospectively analysed. Traditional VBQ, anterior-modified VBQ (MVBQ), posterior-modified VBQ (PVBQ), calibrated VBQ (cVBQ), and T2-weighted scores were calculated from preoperative MRI. Associations with cage subsidence and predictive performance were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 170 patients were included, of whom 67 (39.4%) developed cage subsidence. All T1-weighted bone quality metrics were significantly higher in patients with subsidence and remained independently associated after adjustment for clinical and surgical factors. Among the evaluated methodologies, cVBQ demonstrated the strongest association with subsidence and the highest discriminatory performance (AUC: 0.83). T2-weighted metrics showed weaker predictive ability, with one methodology demonstrating no significant association with subsidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRI-derived bone quality metrics are associated with cage subsidence following single-level ACDF. Among the evaluated approaches, cVBQ demonstrated the highest predictive performance, supporting its potential role as a practical tool for preoperative risk stratification and identification of patients at increased risk of mechanical complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-026-10418-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several modifications of the MRI-derived vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score have been proposed to improve assessment of vertebral bone quality, including anterior-modified, posterior-modified, calibrated, and T2-weighted adaptations. However, these methodologies have not been systematically evaluated in the cervical spine. This study compared the performance of VBQ-derived metrics for predicting cage subsidence following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

Methods: Patients undergoing single-level ACDF with preoperative MRI and postoperative radiographic follow-up were retrospectively analysed. Traditional VBQ, anterior-modified VBQ (MVBQ), posterior-modified VBQ (PVBQ), calibrated VBQ (cVBQ), and T2-weighted scores were calculated from preoperative MRI. Associations with cage subsidence and predictive performance were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Results: A total of 170 patients were included, of whom 67 (39.4%) developed cage subsidence. All T1-weighted bone quality metrics were significantly higher in patients with subsidence and remained independently associated after adjustment for clinical and surgical factors. Among the evaluated methodologies, cVBQ demonstrated the strongest association with subsidence and the highest discriminatory performance (AUC: 0.83). T2-weighted metrics showed weaker predictive ability, with one methodology demonstrating no significant association with subsidence.

Conclusion: MRI-derived bone quality metrics are associated with cage subsidence following single-level ACDF. Among the evaluated approaches, cVBQ demonstrated the highest predictive performance, supporting its potential role as a practical tool for preoperative risk stratification and identification of patients at increased risk of mechanical complications.

一项回顾性队列研究:预测单节段前路颈椎椎间盘切除术和融合术后椎体骨质量评分变异预测椎体沉降的比较分析。
背景:为了改善椎体骨质量的评估,已经提出了对mri衍生椎体骨质量(VBQ)评分的几种修改,包括前位修改、后位修改、校准和t2加权调整。然而,这些方法尚未在颈椎中进行系统的评估。本研究比较了vbq衍生指标在单节段前路颈椎椎间盘切除术和融合(ACDF)后预测椎笼沉降的性能。方法:回顾性分析单节段ACDF患者术前MRI及术后影像学随访资料。术前MRI计算传统VBQ、前位修正VBQ (MVBQ)、后位修正VBQ (PVBQ)、校正VBQ (cVBQ)和t2加权评分。使用多变量逻辑回归和接收者工作特征分析来评估与笼子下沉和预测性能的关联。结果:共纳入170例患者,其中67例(39.4%)发生笼沉降。沉陷患者的所有t1加权骨质量指标均显著升高,且在调整临床和手术因素后仍保持独立相关。在评价的方法中,cVBQ与沉降的相关性最强,判别性能最高(AUC: 0.83)。t2加权指标的预测能力较弱,其中一种方法显示与沉降没有显著关联。结论:mri衍生的骨质量指标与单节段ACDF后的笼沉降有关。在评估的方法中,cVBQ表现出最高的预测性能,支持其作为术前风险分层和识别机械并发症风险增加患者的实用工具的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书