Standardized Spark-Pattern Cut-Mode Electrosurgical Bailout Workflow for Difficult Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Lead Advancement: Procedural and Follow-Up Outcomes From a 15-Patient Case Series.

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Binbin Luo, Longfu Jiang, Xianfeng Du, Hengdong Li, Di Lu, Ding Yuan, Lu Zhang, Nan Zheng, Zixuan Hu
{"title":"Standardized Spark-Pattern Cut-Mode Electrosurgical Bailout Workflow for Difficult Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Lead Advancement: Procedural and Follow-Up Outcomes From a 15-Patient Case Series.","authors":"Binbin Luo, Longfu Jiang, Xianfeng Du, Hengdong Li, Di Lu, Ding Yuan, Lu Zhang, Nan Zheng, Zixuan Hu","doi":"10.1161/CIRCEP.126.015435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electrosurgical facilitation can aid difficult left bundle branch area pacing lead advancement, but standardized delivery patterns, reassessment logic, and follow-up lead performance remain insufficiently defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 15 consecutive patients undergoing standardized spark-pattern cut-mode electrosurgical bailout after conventional mechanical left bundle branch area pacing lead advancement failed. The generator was operated in unipolar cut-mode at 20 W; spark-pattern delivery denoted brief sliding contact to the exposed cathode segment followed by immediate mechanical readvancement and ECG/electrogram reassessment. A prestandardization sustain-mode polymorphic ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation event outside the 15-patient cohort informed the safety workflow.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Conventional advancement failed in all included patients. Across 50 target-site advancement attempts, spark-pattern cut-mode assistance was activated at 15 final target sites, requiring 1.5±0.6 cycles per patient. Procedural success of left bundle branch area pacing lead deployment was achieved in 15/15. V1 terminal rightward progression occurred in 14/15, jump in 14/15, and split/discrete components in 12/15. Spark-associated premature ventricular complexes occurred in 15/15 but were isolated and self-limited; no nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, sustained ventricular tachycardia, polymorphic ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation, defibrillation, or hemodynamic instability occurred during the standardized workflow. Mean follow-up was 400±170 days; no clinically documented lead malfunction, dislodgement, microdislodgement, loss requiring revision, septal perforation, ventricular septal defect, pericardial effusion, or reintervention occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A standardized spark-pattern cut-mode bailout workflow provides a reproducible framework for difficult left bundle branch area pacing lead deployment. Progression markers should be distinguished from procedural success, and follow-up surveillance remains essential. Larger studies with longer follow-up and dedicated lead-integrity testing are required before general adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":10319,"journal":{"name":"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"e015435"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.126.015435","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Electrosurgical facilitation can aid difficult left bundle branch area pacing lead advancement, but standardized delivery patterns, reassessment logic, and follow-up lead performance remain insufficiently defined.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 15 consecutive patients undergoing standardized spark-pattern cut-mode electrosurgical bailout after conventional mechanical left bundle branch area pacing lead advancement failed. The generator was operated in unipolar cut-mode at 20 W; spark-pattern delivery denoted brief sliding contact to the exposed cathode segment followed by immediate mechanical readvancement and ECG/electrogram reassessment. A prestandardization sustain-mode polymorphic ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation event outside the 15-patient cohort informed the safety workflow.

Results: Conventional advancement failed in all included patients. Across 50 target-site advancement attempts, spark-pattern cut-mode assistance was activated at 15 final target sites, requiring 1.5±0.6 cycles per patient. Procedural success of left bundle branch area pacing lead deployment was achieved in 15/15. V1 terminal rightward progression occurred in 14/15, jump in 14/15, and split/discrete components in 12/15. Spark-associated premature ventricular complexes occurred in 15/15 but were isolated and self-limited; no nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, sustained ventricular tachycardia, polymorphic ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation, defibrillation, or hemodynamic instability occurred during the standardized workflow. Mean follow-up was 400±170 days; no clinically documented lead malfunction, dislodgement, microdislodgement, loss requiring revision, septal perforation, ventricular septal defect, pericardial effusion, or reintervention occurred.

Conclusions: A standardized spark-pattern cut-mode bailout workflow provides a reproducible framework for difficult left bundle branch area pacing lead deployment. Progression markers should be distinguished from procedural success, and follow-up surveillance remains essential. Larger studies with longer follow-up and dedicated lead-integrity testing are required before general adoption.

标准化火花模式切割模式电外科救助工作流程困难左束分支区域起搏导联推进:程序和随访结果从15例病例系列。
背景:电外科促进可以帮助困难的左束支区域起搏导联推进,但标准化的交付模式、重新评估逻辑和随访导联表现仍然没有充分的定义。方法回顾性分析连续15例常规机械左束支起搏导联推进失败后行标准化火花模式切割电外科救助的患者。发电机工作在单极切断模式,功率为20w;火花模式传递表示与暴露的阴极段短暂的滑动接触,随后立即机械前进和心电图/电图重新评估。15名患者队列外的标准化前持续模式多态性室性心动过速/室颤事件通知了安全工作流程。结果:所有患者的常规进展均失败。在50个靶点推进尝试中,火花模式切割模式辅助在15个最终靶点激活,每位患者需要1.5±0.6个周期。15/15例患者左束分支起搏导联部署手术成功。V1末端向右进展发生在14/15,14/15发生跳跃,12/15发生分裂/离散组件。15/15例患者发生了电火花相关的过早心室复合物,但这些复合物是孤立的和自限性的;标准化工作流程中未发生非持续性室性心动过速、持续性室性心动过速、多形性室性心动过速/室颤、除颤或血流动力学不稳定。平均随访400±170天;没有临床记录的导联功能障碍、移位、微移位、需要翻修的丢失、室间隔穿孔、室间隔缺损、心包积液或再次介入。结论:一个标准化的火花模式切割模式救助工作流程为困难的左束分支区域起搏导联部署提供了一个可复制的框架。进展标志应与手术成功区分开来,随访监测仍然是必要的。在普遍采用之前,需要进行更大规模的研究,并进行更长时间的随访和专门的铅完整性测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology is a journal dedicated to the study and application of clinical cardiac electrophysiology. It covers a wide range of topics including the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, as well as research in this field. The journal accepts various types of studies, including observational research, clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and advancements in translational research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书