Clinical Features and Outcomes of Therapy-Related Myeloid Neoplasms After CAR T-Cell Therapy.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Michael D Jain, Alaa Ali, Jaime Roman Diaz, Showkat Hamid, Peter Cheng, Saurabh Dahiya, Francesca Sillito, Maeve A O'Reilly, Kai Rejeski, Marion Subklewe, Gloria Iacoboni, Pere Barba, Ana Benzaquen, Javier Delgado-Serrano, Claire Roddie, David A Sallman, Eric Padron, Frederick L Locke, Jay Y Spiegel, Najla Al-Ali, Zachary Thompson, Jongphil Kim, Zhuoer Xie, Rami S Komrokji
{"title":"Clinical Features and Outcomes of Therapy-Related Myeloid Neoplasms After CAR T-Cell Therapy.","authors":"Michael D Jain, Alaa Ali, Jaime Roman Diaz, Showkat Hamid, Peter Cheng, Saurabh Dahiya, Francesca Sillito, Maeve A O'Reilly, Kai Rejeski, Marion Subklewe, Gloria Iacoboni, Pere Barba, Ana Benzaquen, Javier Delgado-Serrano, Claire Roddie, David A Sallman, Eric Padron, Frederick L Locke, Jay Y Spiegel, Najla Al-Ali, Zachary Thompson, Jongphil Kim, Zhuoer Xie, Rami S Komrokji","doi":"10.1182/bloodadvances.2026021831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy occur with short latency, but whether they carry an independent survival disadvantage is unclear. We assembled a multicenter retrospective cohort of 399 adults with t-MN after CAR T-cell therapy (n=56), autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT; n=98), or standard chemotherapy/radiation (n=245), and constructed a nearest-neighbor latency-matched cohort (n=220). Median latency was 15.2 months for post-CAR-T versus 38.0 and 30.0 months for post-auto-HCT and standard therapy (p<0.001). In the matched cohort, median overall survival (OS) was 9.1 months for post-CAR-T versus 16.9 and 18.7 months for post-auto-HCT and standard therapy (p=0.013). In multivariable Cox models, the hazard ratio for overall mortality was 1.98 (95% CI 1.33-2.94) for post-CAR-T and 0.99 (95% CI 0.74-1.32) for post-auto-HCT, each relative to standard therapy; The post-CAR-T estimate was 1.85 (95% CI 1.21-2.82) after adjustment for TP53 status and 2.15 (95% CI 1.23-3.76) in an era-restricted cohort with near-complete molecular data. TP53 variant allele frequency independently predicted OS (HR 1.14 per 10% increment, 95% CI 1.03-1.26). The hazard ratio for allogeneic HCT, modeled as a time-varying covariate, was 0.74 (95% CI 0.52-1.06). Post-CAR-T t-MN carries an independent survival disadvantage not explained by TP53 clone burden; allogeneic HCT remains the only potentially curative option.</p>","PeriodicalId":9228,"journal":{"name":"Blood advances","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood advances","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2026021831","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy occur with short latency, but whether they carry an independent survival disadvantage is unclear. We assembled a multicenter retrospective cohort of 399 adults with t-MN after CAR T-cell therapy (n=56), autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT; n=98), or standard chemotherapy/radiation (n=245), and constructed a nearest-neighbor latency-matched cohort (n=220). Median latency was 15.2 months for post-CAR-T versus 38.0 and 30.0 months for post-auto-HCT and standard therapy (p<0.001). In the matched cohort, median overall survival (OS) was 9.1 months for post-CAR-T versus 16.9 and 18.7 months for post-auto-HCT and standard therapy (p=0.013). In multivariable Cox models, the hazard ratio for overall mortality was 1.98 (95% CI 1.33-2.94) for post-CAR-T and 0.99 (95% CI 0.74-1.32) for post-auto-HCT, each relative to standard therapy; The post-CAR-T estimate was 1.85 (95% CI 1.21-2.82) after adjustment for TP53 status and 2.15 (95% CI 1.23-3.76) in an era-restricted cohort with near-complete molecular data. TP53 variant allele frequency independently predicted OS (HR 1.14 per 10% increment, 95% CI 1.03-1.26). The hazard ratio for allogeneic HCT, modeled as a time-varying covariate, was 0.74 (95% CI 0.52-1.06). Post-CAR-T t-MN carries an independent survival disadvantage not explained by TP53 clone burden; allogeneic HCT remains the only potentially curative option.

CAR - t细胞治疗后治疗相关髓系肿瘤的临床特征和预后
嵌合抗原受体(CAR) t细胞治疗后的治疗相关性髓系肿瘤(t-MN)发生潜伏期短,但它们是否具有独立的生存劣势尚不清楚。我们组建了一个多中心回顾性队列,包括399名接受CAR - t细胞治疗(n=56)、自体造血细胞移植(n= 98)或标准化疗/放疗(n=245)后患有t-MN的成人,并构建了一个最近邻潜伏期匹配队列(n=220)。car - t治疗后的中位潜伏期为15.2个月,而auto- hct和标准治疗后的中位潜伏期为38.0个月和30.0个月
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood advances
Blood advances Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
840
期刊介绍: Blood Advances, a semimonthly medical journal published by the American Society of Hematology, marks the first addition to the Blood family in 70 years. This peer-reviewed, online-only, open-access journal was launched under the leadership of founding editor-in-chief Robert Negrin, MD, from Stanford University Medical Center in Stanford, CA, with its inaugural issue released on November 29, 2016. Blood Advances serves as an international platform for original articles detailing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. The journal comprehensively covers all aspects of hematology, including disorders of leukocytes (both benign and malignant), erythrocytes, platelets, hemostatic mechanisms, vascular biology, immunology, and hematologic oncology. Each article undergoes a rigorous peer-review process, with selection based on the originality of the findings, the high quality of the work presented, and the clarity of the presentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书