Risk Stratification of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Outcomes in Patients With Intermediate sPESI Scores and Negative Cardiac Biomarkers.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Michael Dore, Ryan Duffy, Omar Melikechi
{"title":"Risk Stratification of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Outcomes in Patients With Intermediate sPESI Scores and Negative Cardiac Biomarkers.","authors":"Michael Dore, Ryan Duffy, Omar Melikechi","doi":"10.1111/acem.70425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current pulmonary embolism (PE) guidelines support outpatient management for selected low-risk patients, typically identified using the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI). The prognostic value of individual sPESI scores in the direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) era, particularly when combined with cardiac biomarker assessment, remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>To evaluate 7-day and 30-day all-cause mortality among patients with acute PE, sPESI scores of 2 or 3, and negative cardiac biomarkers treated with a DOAC.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of US adults diagnosed with acute PE in a VA emergency department and prescribed a DOAC within 24 h of diagnosis at any U.S. Veterans Affairs (VA) Health System from 2015 to 2024.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Seven-day and 30-day all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 6427 eligible patients, 1365 had an sPESI score of 2 and 455 had an sPESI score of 3 with negative cardiac biomarkers. In the sPESI 2 cohort, 7-day and 30-day mortality were 0.44% and 1.39%, respectively. In the sPESI 3 cohort, rates were 0.22% and 2.20%. Approximately 71% of sPESI 2 patients and 75% of sPESI 3 patients were hospitalized. Hospitalization was not associated with lower 7-day or 30-day mortality in either cohort.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Patients with acute PE, sPESI scores of 2 or 3, and negative cardiac biomarkers had low short-term mortality in this large, contemporary DOAC-treated cohort. These findings support prospective studies evaluating outpatient management in carefully selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":"33 10","pages":"e70425"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.70425","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current pulmonary embolism (PE) guidelines support outpatient management for selected low-risk patients, typically identified using the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI). The prognostic value of individual sPESI scores in the direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) era, particularly when combined with cardiac biomarker assessment, remains uncertain.

Research question: To evaluate 7-day and 30-day all-cause mortality among patients with acute PE, sPESI scores of 2 or 3, and negative cardiac biomarkers treated with a DOAC.

Study design and methods: Retrospective cohort study of US adults diagnosed with acute PE in a VA emergency department and prescribed a DOAC within 24 h of diagnosis at any U.S. Veterans Affairs (VA) Health System from 2015 to 2024.

Main outcome measures: Seven-day and 30-day all-cause mortality.

Results: Of 6427 eligible patients, 1365 had an sPESI score of 2 and 455 had an sPESI score of 3 with negative cardiac biomarkers. In the sPESI 2 cohort, 7-day and 30-day mortality were 0.44% and 1.39%, respectively. In the sPESI 3 cohort, rates were 0.22% and 2.20%. Approximately 71% of sPESI 2 patients and 75% of sPESI 3 patients were hospitalized. Hospitalization was not associated with lower 7-day or 30-day mortality in either cohort.

Interpretation: Patients with acute PE, sPESI scores of 2 or 3, and negative cardiac biomarkers had low short-term mortality in this large, contemporary DOAC-treated cohort. These findings support prospective studies evaluating outpatient management in carefully selected patients.

急性肺栓塞的风险分层:中度sPESI评分和心脏生物标志物阴性患者的结局
背景:当前的肺栓塞(PE)指南支持选定的低风险患者的门诊管理,通常使用简化的肺栓塞严重程度指数(sPESI)进行识别。在直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)时代,个体sPESI评分的预后价值,特别是当与心脏生物标志物评估相结合时,仍然不确定。研究问题:评估急性PE、sPESI评分为2或3分、心脏生物标志物阴性的患者接受DOAC治疗的7天和30天全因死亡率。研究设计和方法:对2015年至2024年在VA急诊科诊断为急性PE并在任何美国退伍军人事务(VA)卫生系统诊断后24小时内开具DOAC的美国成年人进行回顾性队列研究。主要结局指标:7天和30天全因死亡率。结果:在6427例符合条件的患者中,1365例sPESI评分为2分,455例sPESI评分为3分,心脏生物标志物阴性。在sPESI 2队列中,7天和30天死亡率分别为0.44%和1.39%。在sPESI 3队列中,发生率分别为0.22%和2.20%。大约71%的sPESI 2型患者和75%的sPESI 3型患者住院。在两个队列中,住院治疗与较低的7天或30天死亡率无关。解释:在这个大型当代doac治疗队列中,急性PE、sPESI评分为2或3分、心脏生物标志物阴性的患者短期死亡率较低。这些发现支持对精心挑选的患者进行评估门诊管理的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine. The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more. Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书