{"title":"Risk Stratification of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Outcomes in Patients With Intermediate sPESI Scores and Negative Cardiac Biomarkers.","authors":"Michael Dore, Ryan Duffy, Omar Melikechi","doi":"10.1111/acem.70425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current pulmonary embolism (PE) guidelines support outpatient management for selected low-risk patients, typically identified using the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI). The prognostic value of individual sPESI scores in the direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) era, particularly when combined with cardiac biomarker assessment, remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>To evaluate 7-day and 30-day all-cause mortality among patients with acute PE, sPESI scores of 2 or 3, and negative cardiac biomarkers treated with a DOAC.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of US adults diagnosed with acute PE in a VA emergency department and prescribed a DOAC within 24 h of diagnosis at any U.S. Veterans Affairs (VA) Health System from 2015 to 2024.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Seven-day and 30-day all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 6427 eligible patients, 1365 had an sPESI score of 2 and 455 had an sPESI score of 3 with negative cardiac biomarkers. In the sPESI 2 cohort, 7-day and 30-day mortality were 0.44% and 1.39%, respectively. In the sPESI 3 cohort, rates were 0.22% and 2.20%. Approximately 71% of sPESI 2 patients and 75% of sPESI 3 patients were hospitalized. Hospitalization was not associated with lower 7-day or 30-day mortality in either cohort.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Patients with acute PE, sPESI scores of 2 or 3, and negative cardiac biomarkers had low short-term mortality in this large, contemporary DOAC-treated cohort. These findings support prospective studies evaluating outpatient management in carefully selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":"33 10","pages":"e70425"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.70425","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Current pulmonary embolism (PE) guidelines support outpatient management for selected low-risk patients, typically identified using the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI). The prognostic value of individual sPESI scores in the direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) era, particularly when combined with cardiac biomarker assessment, remains uncertain.
Research question: To evaluate 7-day and 30-day all-cause mortality among patients with acute PE, sPESI scores of 2 or 3, and negative cardiac biomarkers treated with a DOAC.
Study design and methods: Retrospective cohort study of US adults diagnosed with acute PE in a VA emergency department and prescribed a DOAC within 24 h of diagnosis at any U.S. Veterans Affairs (VA) Health System from 2015 to 2024.
Main outcome measures: Seven-day and 30-day all-cause mortality.
Results: Of 6427 eligible patients, 1365 had an sPESI score of 2 and 455 had an sPESI score of 3 with negative cardiac biomarkers. In the sPESI 2 cohort, 7-day and 30-day mortality were 0.44% and 1.39%, respectively. In the sPESI 3 cohort, rates were 0.22% and 2.20%. Approximately 71% of sPESI 2 patients and 75% of sPESI 3 patients were hospitalized. Hospitalization was not associated with lower 7-day or 30-day mortality in either cohort.
Interpretation: Patients with acute PE, sPESI scores of 2 or 3, and negative cardiac biomarkers had low short-term mortality in this large, contemporary DOAC-treated cohort. These findings support prospective studies evaluating outpatient management in carefully selected patients.
期刊介绍:
Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine.
The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more.
Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.