A qualitative assessment of quantitative easing sentiment

IF 1.5 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Economic Inquiry Pub Date : 2026-10-09 Epub Date: 2026-06-06 DOI:10.1111/ecin.70068
Niamh Wylie, Martha O’Hagan-Luff
{"title":"A qualitative assessment of quantitative easing sentiment","authors":"Niamh Wylie,&nbsp;Martha O’Hagan-Luff","doi":"10.1111/ecin.70068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This mixed-method study undertakes a comprehensive inquiry of the public discourse on social media surrounding quantitative easing (QE) across the US, the UK, and the European Union. Utilizing a unique tweet dataset, we reveal the sentiment polarity toward QE policy to be strongly negative, at 71.27%, with positive sentiment a mere 4.25%. Distilling the negative QE sentiment, we identify prominent themes of “anti-government,” “anti-central bank,” “inequality,” “ineffectiveness,” “inflation,” and “asset inflation,” and demonstrate a longitudinal association between perceived inequality and asset price inflation with an anti-establishment stance. We conclude with suggested central bank policy recommendations to restore and foster public trust.</p>","PeriodicalId":51380,"journal":{"name":"Economic Inquiry","volume":"64 4","pages":"1230-1259"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ecin.70068","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecin.70068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This mixed-method study undertakes a comprehensive inquiry of the public discourse on social media surrounding quantitative easing (QE) across the US, the UK, and the European Union. Utilizing a unique tweet dataset, we reveal the sentiment polarity toward QE policy to be strongly negative, at 71.27%, with positive sentiment a mere 4.25%. Distilling the negative QE sentiment, we identify prominent themes of “anti-government,” “anti-central bank,” “inequality,” “ineffectiveness,” “inflation,” and “asset inflation,” and demonstrate a longitudinal association between perceived inequality and asset price inflation with an anti-establishment stance. We conclude with suggested central bank policy recommendations to restore and foster public trust.

定量宽松情绪的定性评估
这项混合方法研究对美国、英国和欧盟有关量化宽松(QE)的社交媒体公共话语进行了全面调查。利用一个独特的推特数据集,我们发现对量化宽松政策的情绪极性是强烈负面的,为71.27%,积极情绪仅为4.25%。通过对负面量化宽松情绪的提炼,我们确定了“反政府”、“反央行”、“不平等”、“无效”、“通胀”和“资产通胀”等突出主题,并证明了在反建制立场下,感知到的不平等和资产价格通胀之间存在纵向关联。最后,我们提出了中央银行恢复和培养公众信任的政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Economic Inquiry
Economic Inquiry ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Published since 1962, (formerly Western Economic Journal), EI is widely regarded as one of the top scholarly journals in its field. Besides containing research on all economics topic areas, a principal objective is to make each article understandable to economists who are not necessarily specialists in the article topic area. Nine Nobel laureates are among EI long list of prestigious authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书