Longitudinal assessment of physiological and mental health changes following acute COVID-19 in Uganda.

Communications health Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-10-01 DOI:10.1038/s44528-026-00024-3
Jennifer A Rooney, Ashley Sharma, Faustine Ceasor, Sara R Schenkel, Andrew Mutekanga, Peter D Jackson, Olive Kabajaasi, Matthew O Wiens, Patricia L Hibberd, D K Arvind, Cathryn Tonne, William Worodria, Peter P Moschovis
{"title":"Longitudinal assessment of physiological and mental health changes following acute COVID-19 in Uganda.","authors":"Jennifer A Rooney, Ashley Sharma, Faustine Ceasor, Sara R Schenkel, Andrew Mutekanga, Peter D Jackson, Olive Kabajaasi, Matthew O Wiens, Patricia L Hibberd, D K Arvind, Cathryn Tonne, William Worodria, Peter P Moschovis","doi":"10.1038/s44528-026-00024-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recovery following acute COVID-19 varies widely, yet early recovery patterns remain understudied in Africa. Given the high burden of post-infection morbidity in resource-limited settings, there is a need to characterize recovery trajectories and identify those at risk for delayed recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 151 adults between July 2021 and July 2022 with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection from healthcare facilities in Uganda and followed them for 12 weeks. Outcomes included pulmonary function, exercise capacity, symptom burden, and mental health, and were analyzed descriptively and using mixed-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants with severe acute COVID-19 had the greatest impairments during recovery. At 12 weeks, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and six-minute walk distance remained lower in severe versus mild cases (mean (SD): 98.45 (22.22) vs 105.26 (12.29); 78.99 (18.83) vs 107.72 (20.44); 409.28 (71.18) vs 506.82 (70.87)), consistent with adjusted models showing lower FEV1 (β = -13.10, 95% CI: -24.13, -2.07), DLCO (β = -40.75, 95% CI: -53.84, -27.66), and six-minute walk distance (β = -95.87, 95% CI: -136.66, -55.08). Continued COVID-19 and mental health symptoms were reported across all groups; mild cases had worse mental health scores (23.19 (12.65) vs 16.95 (13.98)), while severe cases had a broader range of persistent symptoms, including fatigue, breathlessness, and cognitive complaints.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this longitudinal study in Uganda, COVID-19 was associated with persistent physiological and psychosocial impacts, particularly among those with severe illness. Initial severity may help identify individuals at risk for delayed recovery and guide targeted post-COVID care in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":524124,"journal":{"name":"Communications health","volume":"1 1","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13630552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44528-026-00024-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recovery following acute COVID-19 varies widely, yet early recovery patterns remain understudied in Africa. Given the high burden of post-infection morbidity in resource-limited settings, there is a need to characterize recovery trajectories and identify those at risk for delayed recovery.

Methods: We enrolled 151 adults between July 2021 and July 2022 with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection from healthcare facilities in Uganda and followed them for 12 weeks. Outcomes included pulmonary function, exercise capacity, symptom burden, and mental health, and were analyzed descriptively and using mixed-effects models.

Results: Participants with severe acute COVID-19 had the greatest impairments during recovery. At 12 weeks, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and six-minute walk distance remained lower in severe versus mild cases (mean (SD): 98.45 (22.22) vs 105.26 (12.29); 78.99 (18.83) vs 107.72 (20.44); 409.28 (71.18) vs 506.82 (70.87)), consistent with adjusted models showing lower FEV1 (β = -13.10, 95% CI: -24.13, -2.07), DLCO (β = -40.75, 95% CI: -53.84, -27.66), and six-minute walk distance (β = -95.87, 95% CI: -136.66, -55.08). Continued COVID-19 and mental health symptoms were reported across all groups; mild cases had worse mental health scores (23.19 (12.65) vs 16.95 (13.98)), while severe cases had a broader range of persistent symptoms, including fatigue, breathlessness, and cognitive complaints.

Conclusions: In this longitudinal study in Uganda, COVID-19 was associated with persistent physiological and psychosocial impacts, particularly among those with severe illness. Initial severity may help identify individuals at risk for delayed recovery and guide targeted post-COVID care in resource-limited settings.

乌干达急性COVID-19后生理和心理健康变化的纵向评估
背景:COVID-19急性发作后的恢复情况差异很大,但非洲的早期恢复模式仍未得到充分研究。鉴于在资源有限的环境中感染后发病率的高负担,有必要描述恢复轨迹并确定那些有延迟恢复风险的人。方法:我们在2021年7月至2022年7月期间从乌干达的医疗机构招募了151名确诊为SARS-CoV-2感染的成年人,并对他们进行了12周的随访。结果包括肺功能、运动能力、症状负担和心理健康,并使用描述性和混合效应模型进行分析。结果:重症急性COVID-19患者在康复期间损伤最大。12周时,重症患者1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、肺部一氧化碳弥散量(DLCO)和6分钟步行距离仍低于轻度患者(平均(SD): 98.45 (22.22) vs 105.26 (12.29);78.99 (18.83) vs 107.72 (20.44);409.28 (71.18) vs 506.82(70.87)),与调整后的模型一致,显示较低的FEV1 (β = -13.10, 95% CI: -24.13, -2.07), DLCO (β = -40.75, 95% CI: -53.84, -27.66)和6分钟步行距离(β = -95.87, 95% CI: -136.66, -55.08)。所有组都报告了持续的COVID-19和精神健康症状;轻度病例的心理健康评分较差(23.19(12.65)比16.95(13.98)),而重度病例的持续症状范围更广,包括疲劳、呼吸困难和认知不适。结论:在乌干达的这项纵向研究中,COVID-19与持续的生理和社会心理影响有关,特别是在重症患者中。初始严重程度可能有助于识别有延迟恢复风险的个体,并在资源有限的环境中指导有针对性的covid后护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书