The Modified Sparing Binostril Endoscopic Endonasal Approach Combined With an Algorithm-Based Reconstruction Strategy: Surgical and Functional Outcomes in Sellar and Suprasellar Lesions.

IF 1.4
Carmine Antonio Donofrio, Giacomo Bertazzoni, Lucia Riccio, Marika Cominetti, Claudia Lodovica Modesti, Marco Faustini Fustini, Luca Pianta, Daniel Prevedello, Richard Shane Tubbs, Antonio Fioravanti
{"title":"The Modified Sparing Binostril Endoscopic Endonasal Approach Combined With an Algorithm-Based Reconstruction Strategy: Surgical and Functional Outcomes in Sellar and Suprasellar Lesions.","authors":"Carmine Antonio Donofrio, Giacomo Bertazzoni, Lucia Riccio, Marika Cominetti, Claudia Lodovica Modesti, Marco Faustini Fustini, Luca Pianta, Daniel Prevedello, Richard Shane Tubbs, Antonio Fioravanti","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000002214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Conventional binostril endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) provide optimal surgical ergonomics but are often associated with sinonasal morbidity. Conversely, mononostril approaches preserve mucosal integrity at the expense of surgical maneuverability. We hypothesized that the modified sparing binostril approach (moSBA) may provide a favorable balance between surgical exposure, ergonomics, and sinonasal preservation while maintaining flexibility for risk-adapted reconstruction. This study evaluates the feasibility and functional outcomes of this technique combined with a risk-adapted skull base reconstruction strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 81 patients who underwent EEA or extended EEA for sellar and suprasellar lesions between 2021 and 2025. All procedures were performed combining a paraseptal and a contralateral endonasal corridor (moSBA). The risk-adapted reconstructive algorithm included type 1 (hemostatic material with free mucosal graft), type 2 (inlay fat graft with onlay nasoseptal flap), and type 3 (modified gasket-seal). Outcomes included extent of resection, complications, and 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EEAs were performed in 56 (69.1%) and extended EEAs in 25 (30.9%) patients. Intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage occurred in 48 cases (59.3%) and was graded as 1 in 12.3%, 2 in 34.6%, and 3 in 12.3%. Reconstruction types 1, 2, and 3 were used in 40.7%, 46.9%, and 12.4% of cases, respectively. Gross total resection was achieved in 72.9%. Postoperative CSF leakage occurred in 2.5%. On exploratory multivariate analysis, reconstruction complexity was independently associated with higher postoperative SNOT-22 score (B = 3.379, 95% CI: 0.827-5.930, P = .010).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The moSBA appears to be a feasible and safe option for selected sellar and suprasellar lesions, providing favorable surgical and functional outcomes in this single-center experience. Although higher reconstruction complexity was independently associated with higher postoperative SNOT-22 scores, residual confounding related to surgical invasiveness, skull base defect magnitude, and intraoperative CSF leakage severity cannot be excluded.</p>","PeriodicalId":520730,"journal":{"name":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000002214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Conventional binostril endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) provide optimal surgical ergonomics but are often associated with sinonasal morbidity. Conversely, mononostril approaches preserve mucosal integrity at the expense of surgical maneuverability. We hypothesized that the modified sparing binostril approach (moSBA) may provide a favorable balance between surgical exposure, ergonomics, and sinonasal preservation while maintaining flexibility for risk-adapted reconstruction. This study evaluates the feasibility and functional outcomes of this technique combined with a risk-adapted skull base reconstruction strategy.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 81 patients who underwent EEA or extended EEA for sellar and suprasellar lesions between 2021 and 2025. All procedures were performed combining a paraseptal and a contralateral endonasal corridor (moSBA). The risk-adapted reconstructive algorithm included type 1 (hemostatic material with free mucosal graft), type 2 (inlay fat graft with onlay nasoseptal flap), and type 3 (modified gasket-seal). Outcomes included extent of resection, complications, and 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) assessment.

Results: EEAs were performed in 56 (69.1%) and extended EEAs in 25 (30.9%) patients. Intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage occurred in 48 cases (59.3%) and was graded as 1 in 12.3%, 2 in 34.6%, and 3 in 12.3%. Reconstruction types 1, 2, and 3 were used in 40.7%, 46.9%, and 12.4% of cases, respectively. Gross total resection was achieved in 72.9%. Postoperative CSF leakage occurred in 2.5%. On exploratory multivariate analysis, reconstruction complexity was independently associated with higher postoperative SNOT-22 score (B = 3.379, 95% CI: 0.827-5.930, P = .010).

Conclusion: The moSBA appears to be a feasible and safe option for selected sellar and suprasellar lesions, providing favorable surgical and functional outcomes in this single-center experience. Although higher reconstruction complexity was independently associated with higher postoperative SNOT-22 scores, residual confounding related to surgical invasiveness, skull base defect magnitude, and intraoperative CSF leakage severity cannot be excluded.

改良的保留Binostril内镜鼻内入路结合基于算法的重建策略:鞍上病变的手术和功能结果。
背景和目的:传统的双腔内窥镜鼻内入路(EEAs)提供了最佳的手术工效学,但往往与鼻窦发病率相关。相反,单鼻孔入路以牺牲手术可操作性为代价保持粘膜完整性。我们假设改良的保留binostril入路(moSBA)可以在手术暴露、人体工程学和鼻窦保护之间提供有利的平衡,同时保持风险适应性重建的灵活性。本研究评估了该技术结合风险适应颅底重建策略的可行性和功能结果。方法:我们回顾性分析了2021年至2025年间81例因鞍上病变接受EEA或扩展EEA的患者。所有手术均采用隔旁和对侧鼻内通道(moSBA)联合进行。风险适应重建算法包括1型(止血材料与游离粘膜移植),2型(嵌体脂肪移植与嵌体鼻中隔瓣)和3型(改良垫片密封)。结果包括切除程度、并发症和22项鼻窦预后测试(SNOT-22)评估。结果:56例(69.1%)患者行EEAs, 25例(30.9%)患者行延长EEAs。术中发生脑脊液漏48例(59.3%),分级为12.3% 1例、34.6% 2例、12.3% 3例。重建类型1、2和3分别占40.7%、46.9%和12.4%。总切除率为72.9%。术后脑脊液漏发生率为2.5%。在探索性多因素分析中,重建复杂性与术后较高的SNOT-22评分独立相关(B = 3.379, 95% CI: 0.827-5.930, P = 0.010)。结论:moSBA似乎是一种可行和安全的选择,用于选择鞍上病变,在这种单中心经验中提供良好的手术和功能效果。虽然较高的重建复杂性与术后较高的SNOT-22评分独立相关,但不能排除与手术侵入性、颅底缺损程度和术中脑脊液漏严重程度相关的残留混杂因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书