Disparities in Virtual Outpatient Mental Health Care Utilization Among Commercially Insured Children and Adults, 2023-2025.

IF 2
Dena M Bravata, James M Hudson, Severin Kibby, Jonathan Cantor, Christopher Whaley, Nicole M Benson
{"title":"Disparities in Virtual Outpatient Mental Health Care Utilization Among Commercially Insured Children and Adults, 2023-2025.","authors":"Dena M Bravata, James M Hudson, Severin Kibby, Jonathan Cantor, Christopher Whaley, Nicole M Benson","doi":"10.1177/15305627261493347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early COVID-19 pandemic-era studies documented rapid adoption of telemental health, but current utilization patterns and disparities, particularly among children and young adults, remain poorly characterized since the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency ended in May 2023. The objective of this work was to characterize current utilization of virtual versus in-person outpatient mental health care in a large national cohort of commercially insured children and adults and to assess variation by patient, provider, clinical, and geographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 28,844,298 outpatient mental health visits delivered to 1,843,439 commercially insured patients aged 6-64 years between January 2023 and December 2025. The primary outcome was the percentage of visits delivered virtually, compared across age, gender, provider type, diagnosis, state, urbanicity, and social vulnerability index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 77.6% of visits were delivered virtually, declining from 79.7% (2023) to 76.2% (2025). Children aged 6-12 years had substantially lower telehealth utilization than young adults aged 18-24 years (37.1% vs. 77.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), a disparity more pronounced for psychotherapy than psychiatry. Virtual care was highest for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, anxiety, and depressive disorders, and higher among prescribers than psychotherapists (90.4% vs. 75.7%). Rural patients used virtual care less than urban patients (70.3% vs. 77.5%), whereas utilization was higher among patients in areas of greater social vulnerability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this large national cohort, virtual mental health care remained widely used but unevenly distributed. Persistent disparities by age, geography, clinical need, and social vulnerability highlight the need for hybrid care models and policies addressing digital access barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":"15305627261493347"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15305627261493347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Early COVID-19 pandemic-era studies documented rapid adoption of telemental health, but current utilization patterns and disparities, particularly among children and young adults, remain poorly characterized since the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency ended in May 2023. The objective of this work was to characterize current utilization of virtual versus in-person outpatient mental health care in a large national cohort of commercially insured children and adults and to assess variation by patient, provider, clinical, and geographic characteristics.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 28,844,298 outpatient mental health visits delivered to 1,843,439 commercially insured patients aged 6-64 years between January 2023 and December 2025. The primary outcome was the percentage of visits delivered virtually, compared across age, gender, provider type, diagnosis, state, urbanicity, and social vulnerability index.

Results: Overall, 77.6% of visits were delivered virtually, declining from 79.7% (2023) to 76.2% (2025). Children aged 6-12 years had substantially lower telehealth utilization than young adults aged 18-24 years (37.1% vs. 77.0%, p < 0.001), a disparity more pronounced for psychotherapy than psychiatry. Virtual care was highest for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, anxiety, and depressive disorders, and higher among prescribers than psychotherapists (90.4% vs. 75.7%). Rural patients used virtual care less than urban patients (70.3% vs. 77.5%), whereas utilization was higher among patients in areas of greater social vulnerability.

Conclusions: In this large national cohort, virtual mental health care remained widely used but unevenly distributed. Persistent disparities by age, geography, clinical need, and social vulnerability highlight the need for hybrid care models and policies addressing digital access barriers.

2023-2025年商业保险儿童和成人虚拟门诊精神卫生保健利用差异
导论:COVID-19大流行时期的早期研究记录了远程卫生的迅速普及,但自2023年5月COVID-19突发公共卫生事件结束以来,目前的利用模式和差距,特别是在儿童和年轻人中,仍然缺乏特征。这项工作的目的是在一个大型的国家商业保险儿童和成人队列中描述当前虚拟与面对面门诊精神卫生保健的利用情况,并评估患者、提供者、临床和地理特征的差异。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们分析了2023年1月至2025年12月期间,对1,843,439名年龄在6-64岁之间的商业保险患者进行的28,844,298次门诊心理健康就诊。主要结果是虚拟访问的百分比,比较不同年龄、性别、提供者类型、诊断、州、城市化和社会脆弱性指数。结果:总体而言,77.6%的访问是虚拟的,从79.7%(2023年)下降到76.2%(2025年)。6-12岁儿童的远程医疗使用率明显低于18-24岁的年轻人(37.1%比77.0%,p < 0.001),心理治疗比精神病学的差异更明显。虚拟护理对注意力缺陷/多动障碍、焦虑和抑郁障碍的治疗效果最高,处方医师的虚拟护理效果高于心理治疗师(90.4%对75.7%)。农村患者使用虚拟护理的比例低于城市患者(70.3%对77.5%),而在社会脆弱性较大的地区,患者的使用率更高。结论:在这个庞大的国家队列中,虚拟精神卫生保健仍然被广泛使用,但分布不均匀。年龄、地理位置、临床需求和社会脆弱性方面的持续差异突出表明,需要采用混合护理模式和政策来解决数字获取障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书