Effects of substance use on sedation requirements in critically ill patients.

Brittany R Weger, Lindsey Gignac, Shannon M Reneau, Alyssa Booth
{"title":"Effects of substance use on sedation requirements in critically ill patients.","authors":"Brittany R Weger, Lindsey Gignac, Shannon M Reneau, Alyssa Booth","doi":"10.9740/mhc.2026.10.223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of substance use on sedation requirements in critically ill patients to optimize dosing in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational, institutional review board-approved, cohort study. Included individuals were aged 18 years and older, required mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours, and had a history of substance use in the intervention group, defined as documentation of using 1 or more substances within the past year. The primary outcome was the maximum number of concurrent continuous analgesic and sedative infusions required during intubation and mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary outcome, maximum number of concurrent continuous analgesic and sedative infusions, was significantly higher when comparing subjects with substance use to those without substance use (3 vs 2 infusions; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Significantly higher doses of analgesia and sedation were also required in the substance use group, including fentanyl (150 vs 100 mcg/hr; <i>P</i> = 0.024), dexmedetomidine (1.2 vs 1.0 mcg/kg/hr; <i>P</i> = 0.040), and benzodiazepines measured in lorazepam equivalents (3 vs 1.5 mg/hr; <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In mechanically ventilated subjects, a statistically significantly higher number of concurrent continuous analgesic and sedative infusions were used in the substance use group, with larger doses required to sedate subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":101313,"journal":{"name":"The mental health clinician","volume":"16 5","pages":"223-228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13632460/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The mental health clinician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2026.10.223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of substance use on sedation requirements in critically ill patients to optimize dosing in this population.

Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational, institutional review board-approved, cohort study. Included individuals were aged 18 years and older, required mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours, and had a history of substance use in the intervention group, defined as documentation of using 1 or more substances within the past year. The primary outcome was the maximum number of concurrent continuous analgesic and sedative infusions required during intubation and mechanical ventilation.

Results: The primary outcome, maximum number of concurrent continuous analgesic and sedative infusions, was significantly higher when comparing subjects with substance use to those without substance use (3 vs 2 infusions; P < 0.001). Significantly higher doses of analgesia and sedation were also required in the substance use group, including fentanyl (150 vs 100 mcg/hr; P = 0.024), dexmedetomidine (1.2 vs 1.0 mcg/kg/hr; P = 0.040), and benzodiazepines measured in lorazepam equivalents (3 vs 1.5 mg/hr; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: In mechanically ventilated subjects, a statistically significantly higher number of concurrent continuous analgesic and sedative infusions were used in the substance use group, with larger doses required to sedate subjects.

物质使用对危重病人镇静需求的影响。
简介:本研究的目的是评估物质使用对危重患者镇静需求的影响,以优化该人群的剂量。方法:这是一项多中心、回顾性、观察性、机构审查委员会批准的队列研究。纳入的个体年龄在18岁及以上,需要机械通气超过24小时,并且在干预组中有物质使用史,定义为在过去一年内使用一种或多种物质的记录。主要结局是插管和机械通气期间需要的最大并发连续镇痛和镇静输注次数。结果:主要终点,同时连续注射镇痛和镇静药物的最大次数,在使用药物的受试者中显著高于未使用药物的受试者(3次注射vs 2次注射;P < 0.001)。药物使用组也需要明显更高剂量的镇痛和镇静,包括芬太尼(150 vs 100 mcg/hr; P = 0.024),右美托咪定(1.2 vs 1.0 mcg/kg/hr; P = 0.040),苯二氮卓类药物以劳拉西泮当量测量(3 vs 1.5 mg/hr; P < 0.001)。结论:在机械通气受试者中,物质使用组同时连续输注镇痛和镇静药物的次数有统计学意义,且需要更大的剂量来镇静受试者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书