Stanley Hughwa Hung, Sharon F Kramer, Emilio Werden, Vincent Thijs, Bruce C V Campbell, Amy Brodtmann
{"title":"Feasibility of Sarcopenia Assessment and Association With Functional Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke.","authors":"Stanley Hughwa Hung, Sharon F Kramer, Emilio Werden, Vincent Thijs, Bruce C V Campbell, Amy Brodtmann","doi":"10.3138/ptc-2024-0088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> The primary aim was to report feasibility of sarcopenia assessment within 7 days of ischemic stroke. Secondary aims were to estimate prevalence of sarcopenia and its association with functional outcome after stroke. <b><i>Method:</i></b> Participants, ischemic stroke survivors from two hospital acute stroke units, underwent sarcopenia assessment steps using the revised European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP-2) guidelines within 7 days after stroke. Functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS]) was assessed 4-6 months post-stroke. Assessment steps were feasible if all participants completed them without serious adverse events. Ordinal regression was used to assess mRS associations at 4-6 months (dependent variable) with grip strength and muscle mass during the acute phase post-stroke (independent variables). <b><i>Results:</i></b> All 47 participants completed bioelectrical impedance analyses (BIA) and grip strength with at least the non-stroke affected side without serious adverse events. Six and five participants did not complete chair-rise and gait speed tests, respectively. Four participants (9%) met criteria for sarcopenia. Higher grip strength was independently associated with reduced odds of higher mRS scores. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Grip strength and BIA assessments using the EWGSOP-2 guidelines were feasible. Skeletal muscle strength may be an intervention target to improve functional outcome after stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":54606,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Canada","volume":"78 2","pages":"259-268"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13641779/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Canada","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc-2024-0088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The primary aim was to report feasibility of sarcopenia assessment within 7 days of ischemic stroke. Secondary aims were to estimate prevalence of sarcopenia and its association with functional outcome after stroke. Method: Participants, ischemic stroke survivors from two hospital acute stroke units, underwent sarcopenia assessment steps using the revised European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP-2) guidelines within 7 days after stroke. Functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS]) was assessed 4-6 months post-stroke. Assessment steps were feasible if all participants completed them without serious adverse events. Ordinal regression was used to assess mRS associations at 4-6 months (dependent variable) with grip strength and muscle mass during the acute phase post-stroke (independent variables). Results: All 47 participants completed bioelectrical impedance analyses (BIA) and grip strength with at least the non-stroke affected side without serious adverse events. Six and five participants did not complete chair-rise and gait speed tests, respectively. Four participants (9%) met criteria for sarcopenia. Higher grip strength was independently associated with reduced odds of higher mRS scores. Conclusions: Grip strength and BIA assessments using the EWGSOP-2 guidelines were feasible. Skeletal muscle strength may be an intervention target to improve functional outcome after stroke.
期刊介绍:
Physiotherapy Canada is the official, scholarly, refereed journal of the Canadian Physiotherapy Association (CPA), giving direction to excellence in clinical science and reasoning, knowledge translation, therapeutic skills and patient-centred care.
Founded in 1923, Physiotherapy Canada meets the diverse needs of national and international readers and serves as a key repository of inquiries, evidence and advances in the practice of physiotherapy.
Physiotherapy Canada publishes the results of qualitative and quantitative research including systematic reviews, meta analyses, meta syntheses, public/health policy research, clinical practice guidelines, and case reports. Key messages, clinical commentaries, brief reports and book reviews support knowledge translation to clinical practice.
In addition to delivering authoritative, original scientific articles and reports of significant clinical studies, Physiotherapy Canada’s editorials and abstracts are presented in both English and French, expanding the journal’s reach nationally and internationally. Key messages form an integral part of each research article, providing a succinct summary for readers of all levels. This approach also allows readers to quickly get a feel for ‘what is already known’ and ‘what this study adds to’ the subject.
Clinician’s commentaries for key articles assist in bridging research and practice by discussing the article’s impact at the clinical level. The journal also features special themed series which bring readers up to date research supporting evidence-informed practice.
The Canadian Physiotherapy Association (CPA) is the national professional association representing almost 15,000 members distributed throughout all provinces and territories. CPA’s mission is to provide leadership and direction to the physiotherapy profession, foster excellence in practice, education and research, and promote high standards of health in Canada.