Patient Navigation and Postpartum Health Care Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 12.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lynn M Yee, Joe Feinglass, Brittney R Williams, Laura Diaz, Viridiana Carmona-Barrera, Ying Cheung, Ka'Derricka Davis, Chen Yeh, Charlotte M Niznik, Michelle A Kominiarek, William A Grobman
{"title":"Patient Navigation and Postpartum Health Care Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Lynn M Yee, Joe Feinglass, Brittney R Williams, Laura Diaz, Viridiana Carmona-Barrera, Ying Cheung, Ka'Derricka Davis, Chen Yeh, Charlotte M Niznik, Michelle A Kominiarek, William A Grobman","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2026.3338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Postpartum care in the US is fragmented and inadequate, with major disparities in quality. Patient navigation is a promising health services intervention to improve health care provision and reduce disparities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether postpartum patient navigation improved postpartum health care quality among people with low incomes.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This randomized clinical trial was conducted at a single urban academic medical center from January 2020 to July 2024 and included English- or Spanish-speaking pregnant people 16 years or older with Medicaid insurance. Data analysis started in October 2024.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Participants were randomly assigned to 1 year of patient navigation vs usual care. Those randomized to navigation received individualized services that were designed to overcome postpartum-specific barriers to care from a trained lay navigator.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome, as ascertained from medical records, was receipt of 6 care elements considered to be essential to optimal postpartum care by 12 weeks postpartum. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of components received by 12 weeks and receipt of health services at 11 to 13 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 405 people (mean [SD] age, 28.2 [5.7] years; 10 [2%] were Asian, multiracial, or another race; 166 [41%] were Hispanic; 202 [50%] were non-Hispanic Black; and 27 [7%] were non-Hispanic White) were randomized (203 [50%] in patient navigation; 202 [50%] received usual care). The frequency of the primary outcome (ie, receipt of all 6 essential components of postpartum care) was similar between the groups (19 [9.4%] in patient navigation vs 16 [7.9%] in usual care; P = .60). However, the mean (SD) proportion of components received was significantly higher among navigation recipients (71% [17%] vs 64% [23%]; P = .002). Three components drove this difference: postpartum visit completion (195 [96%] vs 161 [80%]; P < .001), receipt of all indicated anticipatory guidance (131 [65%] vs 104 [51%]; P = .01), and postpartum depression screening and care (174 [86%] vs 145 [72%]; P < .001). At 11 to 13 months, participants randomized to navigation were more likely to have attended a primary care visit, be using their desired family planning method, and have received depression screening and linkage, cardiometabolic screening, and recommended vaccines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this randomized clinical trial suggest that although patient navigation did not result in a higher frequency of achieving all 6 components of postpartum care, the proportion of care components received was significantly higher. At 1 year postpartum, those randomized to patient navigation demonstrated multiple improved health services outcomes, including more frequent transition to primary care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03922334.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"7 10","pages":"e263338"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13633535/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2026.3338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Postpartum care in the US is fragmented and inadequate, with major disparities in quality. Patient navigation is a promising health services intervention to improve health care provision and reduce disparities.

Objective: To evaluate whether postpartum patient navigation improved postpartum health care quality among people with low incomes.

Design, setting, and participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at a single urban academic medical center from January 2020 to July 2024 and included English- or Spanish-speaking pregnant people 16 years or older with Medicaid insurance. Data analysis started in October 2024.

Intervention: Participants were randomly assigned to 1 year of patient navigation vs usual care. Those randomized to navigation received individualized services that were designed to overcome postpartum-specific barriers to care from a trained lay navigator.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome, as ascertained from medical records, was receipt of 6 care elements considered to be essential to optimal postpartum care by 12 weeks postpartum. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of components received by 12 weeks and receipt of health services at 11 to 13 months.

Results: A total of 405 people (mean [SD] age, 28.2 [5.7] years; 10 [2%] were Asian, multiracial, or another race; 166 [41%] were Hispanic; 202 [50%] were non-Hispanic Black; and 27 [7%] were non-Hispanic White) were randomized (203 [50%] in patient navigation; 202 [50%] received usual care). The frequency of the primary outcome (ie, receipt of all 6 essential components of postpartum care) was similar between the groups (19 [9.4%] in patient navigation vs 16 [7.9%] in usual care; P = .60). However, the mean (SD) proportion of components received was significantly higher among navigation recipients (71% [17%] vs 64% [23%]; P = .002). Three components drove this difference: postpartum visit completion (195 [96%] vs 161 [80%]; P < .001), receipt of all indicated anticipatory guidance (131 [65%] vs 104 [51%]; P = .01), and postpartum depression screening and care (174 [86%] vs 145 [72%]; P < .001). At 11 to 13 months, participants randomized to navigation were more likely to have attended a primary care visit, be using their desired family planning method, and have received depression screening and linkage, cardiometabolic screening, and recommended vaccines.

Conclusions: The results of this randomized clinical trial suggest that although patient navigation did not result in a higher frequency of achieving all 6 components of postpartum care, the proportion of care components received was significantly higher. At 1 year postpartum, those randomized to patient navigation demonstrated multiple improved health services outcomes, including more frequent transition to primary care.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03922334.

患者导航和产后保健结果:一项随机临床试验。
重要性:美国的产后护理是碎片化和不充分的,质量上存在重大差异。病人导航是一个很有前途的卫生服务干预,以改善卫生保健提供和减少差距。目的:评价产后患者导航是否能提高低收入人群产后保健质量。设计、环境和参与者:这项随机临床试验于2020年1月至2024年7月在一个城市学术医疗中心进行,包括16岁或以上有医疗补助保险的英语或西班牙语孕妇。数据分析始于2024年10月。干预:参与者被随机分配到1年患者导航组和常规护理组。那些被随机分配到导航组的人接受了个性化的服务,这些服务旨在克服产后特殊障碍,由训练有素的外行导航员进行护理。主要结局和措施:从医疗记录中确定的主要结局是在产后12周接受6项被认为是最佳产后护理所必需的护理要素。次要结局包括12周时收到的成分比例和11至13个月时接受保健服务的比例。结果:共纳入405人(平均[SD]年龄28.2[5.7]岁;10人[2%]为亚洲人、多种族或其他种族;166人[41%]为西班牙裔;202人[50%]为非西班牙裔黑人;27人[7%]为非西班牙裔白人)(203人[50%]为患者导航;202人[50%]接受常规护理)。主要结局(即接受所有6项产后护理基本组成部分)的频率在两组之间相似(导航组为19例[9.4%],常规护理组为16例[7.9%];P = 0.60)。然而,在导航接受者中,收到的组件的平均(SD)比例明显更高(71% [17%]vs 64% [23%]; P = 0.002)。结论:这项随机临床试验的结果表明,尽管患者导航并没有导致更高的实现产后护理全部6个组成部分的频率,但接受护理组成部分的比例明显更高。在产后1年,随机分配到患者导航组的患者显示出多种改善的卫生服务结果,包括更频繁地过渡到初级保健。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03922334。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书