Michelle Maroto, Guillaume Durou, Samuel Braden, Andrea DeKeseredy
{"title":"Promoting Precarity or Creating Cushions? Examining Canadians' Experiences With Financialization and Insecurity Across the Life Course.","authors":"Michelle Maroto, Guillaume Durou, Samuel Braden, Andrea DeKeseredy","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.70181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines experiences and perceptions of economic insecurity across individual social trajectories within the context of pervasive financialization in Canada. Drawing on a comprehensive pan-Canadian survey (n = 7483) and set of interviews (n = 127) collected as part of the Great Canadian Class Study (GCCS), we use a mixed-methods approach to explore how inflation, the housing crisis, and labor market precarity combined with the expansion of consumer credit, student loans, and mortgage debt shape people's immediate experiences with insecurity and their perceptions of future insecurity. Although insecurity was pervasive across respondents with many reporting heightened stress about financial futures and increased reliance on credit mechanisms, the experiences and perceptions of insecurity varied across the life course. Older adults over age 65 tended to be the most secure, in part due to being retired homeowners with savings. Younger adults experienced greater insecurity, especially when they were unemployed, held stressful amounts of debt, or were priced out of home ownership opportunities. Qualitative findings both confirmed and contradicted these results. In addition to illustrating how renting and debt promoted precarity for young adults, and highlighting how home ownership and personal safety nets often created cushions for respondents, qualitative findings also pointed toward conflicting situations that included the need for family supports and the limitations of home ownership and savings in periods of inflation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51368,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sociology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.70181","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines experiences and perceptions of economic insecurity across individual social trajectories within the context of pervasive financialization in Canada. Drawing on a comprehensive pan-Canadian survey (n = 7483) and set of interviews (n = 127) collected as part of the Great Canadian Class Study (GCCS), we use a mixed-methods approach to explore how inflation, the housing crisis, and labor market precarity combined with the expansion of consumer credit, student loans, and mortgage debt shape people's immediate experiences with insecurity and their perceptions of future insecurity. Although insecurity was pervasive across respondents with many reporting heightened stress about financial futures and increased reliance on credit mechanisms, the experiences and perceptions of insecurity varied across the life course. Older adults over age 65 tended to be the most secure, in part due to being retired homeowners with savings. Younger adults experienced greater insecurity, especially when they were unemployed, held stressful amounts of debt, or were priced out of home ownership opportunities. Qualitative findings both confirmed and contradicted these results. In addition to illustrating how renting and debt promoted precarity for young adults, and highlighting how home ownership and personal safety nets often created cushions for respondents, qualitative findings also pointed toward conflicting situations that included the need for family supports and the limitations of home ownership and savings in periods of inflation.
期刊介绍:
British Journal of Sociology is published on behalf of the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) is unique in the United Kingdom in its concentration on teaching and research across the full range of the social, political and economic sciences. Founded in 1895 by Beatrice and Sidney Webb, the LSE is one of the largest colleges within the University of London and has an outstanding reputation for academic excellence nationally and internationally. Mission Statement: • To be a leading sociology journal in terms of academic substance, scholarly reputation , with relevance to and impact on the social and democratic questions of our times • To publish papers demonstrating the highest standards of scholarship in sociology from authors worldwide; • To carry papers from across the full range of sociological research and knowledge • To lead debate on key methodological and theoretical questions and controversies in contemporary sociology, for example through the annual lecture special issue • To highlight new areas of sociological research, new developments in sociological theory, and new methodological innovations, for example through timely special sections and special issues • To react quickly to major publishing and/or world events by producing special issues and/or sections • To publish the best work from scholars in new and emerging regions where sociology is developing • To encourage new and aspiring sociologists to submit papers to the journal, and to spotlight their work through the early career prize • To engage with the sociological community – academics as well as students – in the UK and abroad, through social media, and a journal blog.