Does more generous health insurance reimbursement lead to moral hazard? Evidence from large-scale administrative data in China.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Jiakai Gong, Yingjie Zhu, Jiawu Dai, Chen Zhu
{"title":"Does more generous health insurance reimbursement lead to moral hazard? Evidence from large-scale administrative data in China.","authors":"Jiakai Gong, Yingjie Zhu, Jiawu Dai, Chen Zhu","doi":"10.1007/s10198-026-01976-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper exploits the discrete increase in reimbursement rates at the statutory retirement age as a quasi-natural experiment to examine ex post moral hazard in inpatient care in China. Using nationally representative administrative data covering more than 450,000 hospitalization records across 29 provinces, we implement a cohort difference-in-differences design to identify the causal effect of insurance generosity on healthcare utilization. We find that a 5-percentage-point increase in reimbursement rates increases length of stay by 1.73 days and total inpatient expenditures by RMB 709.98. The additional spending is primarily financed by the insurance pool, while patients' out-of-pocket payments decline, consistent with moral hazard predictions. Decomposition results show that the spending increase is concentrated in diagnostic services, pharmaceutical use, and inpatient care components such as bed and nursing services, rather than high-intensity treatments. Further analysis highlights the role of supply-side institutional constraints: under the Diagnosis-Intervention Packet (DIP) payment system, utilization responses are largely muted, whereas under non-DIP regimes they remain substantial. In addition, moral hazard is concentrated in secondary hospitals. Overall, these findings suggest that moral hazard in inpatient care reflects demand-side price responsiveness and manifests differently across supply-side institutional environments. This institutional heterogeneity also underscores the potential importance of provider payment reform in health insurance policy design.</p>","PeriodicalId":51416,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-026-01976-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper exploits the discrete increase in reimbursement rates at the statutory retirement age as a quasi-natural experiment to examine ex post moral hazard in inpatient care in China. Using nationally representative administrative data covering more than 450,000 hospitalization records across 29 provinces, we implement a cohort difference-in-differences design to identify the causal effect of insurance generosity on healthcare utilization. We find that a 5-percentage-point increase in reimbursement rates increases length of stay by 1.73 days and total inpatient expenditures by RMB 709.98. The additional spending is primarily financed by the insurance pool, while patients' out-of-pocket payments decline, consistent with moral hazard predictions. Decomposition results show that the spending increase is concentrated in diagnostic services, pharmaceutical use, and inpatient care components such as bed and nursing services, rather than high-intensity treatments. Further analysis highlights the role of supply-side institutional constraints: under the Diagnosis-Intervention Packet (DIP) payment system, utilization responses are largely muted, whereas under non-DIP regimes they remain substantial. In addition, moral hazard is concentrated in secondary hospitals. Overall, these findings suggest that moral hazard in inpatient care reflects demand-side price responsiveness and manifests differently across supply-side institutional environments. This institutional heterogeneity also underscores the potential importance of provider payment reform in health insurance policy design.

更慷慨的医疗保险报销会导致道德风险吗?来自中国大规模行政数据的证据。
本文利用法定退休年龄时报销率的离散增长作为准自然实验来检验中国住院医疗事后道德风险。利用涵盖29个省份超过45万份住院记录的具有全国代表性的行政数据,我们实施了一项队列差分设计,以确定保险慷慨对医疗保健利用的因果影响。我们发现,报销率每提高5个百分点,住院天数就会增加1.73天,住院总费用就会增加709.98元。额外的支出主要由保险池提供资金,而患者的自付费用下降,这与道德风险预测相符。分解结果表明,增加的支出主要集中在诊断服务、药物使用和住院护理部分,如床位和护理服务,而不是高强度治疗。进一步的分析强调了供给侧制度限制的作用:在诊断干预包(DIP)支付制度下,利用反应很大程度上是温和的,而在非DIP制度下,利用反应仍然很大。此外,道德风险主要集中在二级医院。总体而言,这些研究结果表明,住院护理中的道德风险反映了需求侧的价格响应,并且在供给侧的制度环境中表现不同。这种制度的异质性也强调了医疗保险政策设计中提供者支付改革的潜在重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Health Economics is a journal of Health Economics and associated disciplines. The growing demand for health economics and the introduction of new guidelines in various European countries were the motivation to generate a highly scientific and at the same time practice oriented journal considering the requirements of various health care systems in Europe. The international scientific board of opinion leaders guarantees high-quality, peer-reviewed publications as well as articles for pragmatic approaches in the field of health economics. We intend to cover all aspects of health economics: • Basics of health economic approaches and methods • Pharmacoeconomics • Health Care Systems • Pricing and Reimbursement Systems • Quality-of-Life-Studies The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements. Officially cited as: Eur J Health Econ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书