Beyond Risk Identification: Adherence to a Pediatric Suicide Prevention Pathway in Primary Care.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Alexandra Huttle, Mangala Rajan, Nicole E Kelly, Luz Jimenez, Cori M Green
{"title":"Beyond Risk Identification: Adherence to a Pediatric Suicide Prevention Pathway in Primary Care.","authors":"Alexandra Huttle, Mangala Rajan, Nicole E Kelly, Luz Jimenez, Cori M Green","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2026.103469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate adherence to a structured suicide prevention pathway in pediatric primary care and characterize management practices following suicide risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of well-child visits among adolescents aged 12-21 years at an urban academic pediatric clinic from 2022-2024. The pathway incorporated the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Modified for Adolescents (PHQ-A) for suicide risk identification and the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) for risk assessment. Electronic health record (EHR) data assessed adherence to pathway components, and supplemental chart review characterized management practices, including safety planning and emergency department referral. Multivariable regression examined patient-, provider-, and system-level factors associated with adherence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3440 visits, the PHQ-A was completed in 84.8%. Suicide risk was identified in 8.6%, and 57.8% received a C-SSRS. When an EHR alert was triggered, 79% completed the C-SSRS compared with 11% without an alert (p < 0.001). Older adolescents were less likely to receive a C-SSRS assessment (aRR=0.93; 95% CI: 0.89-0.97). Among adolescents with low or moderate C-SSRS risk levels, 20.8% had documentation of a complete six-step collaborative safety plan. Manual chart review identified additional suicide-related management practices beyond the adherence metric, including partial safety planning, behavioral health involvement, referral to mental health services, and ongoing mental health treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Suicide prevention pathways can support identification, assessment, and management of suicide risk in pediatric primary care. EHR-based decision support may improve adherence. Defining evidence-based components of pediatric suicide prevention remains critical.</p>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"103469"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2026.103469","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate adherence to a structured suicide prevention pathway in pediatric primary care and characterize management practices following suicide risk assessment.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of well-child visits among adolescents aged 12-21 years at an urban academic pediatric clinic from 2022-2024. The pathway incorporated the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Modified for Adolescents (PHQ-A) for suicide risk identification and the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) for risk assessment. Electronic health record (EHR) data assessed adherence to pathway components, and supplemental chart review characterized management practices, including safety planning and emergency department referral. Multivariable regression examined patient-, provider-, and system-level factors associated with adherence.

Results: Among 3440 visits, the PHQ-A was completed in 84.8%. Suicide risk was identified in 8.6%, and 57.8% received a C-SSRS. When an EHR alert was triggered, 79% completed the C-SSRS compared with 11% without an alert (p < 0.001). Older adolescents were less likely to receive a C-SSRS assessment (aRR=0.93; 95% CI: 0.89-0.97). Among adolescents with low or moderate C-SSRS risk levels, 20.8% had documentation of a complete six-step collaborative safety plan. Manual chart review identified additional suicide-related management practices beyond the adherence metric, including partial safety planning, behavioral health involvement, referral to mental health services, and ongoing mental health treatment.

Conclusions: Suicide prevention pathways can support identification, assessment, and management of suicide risk in pediatric primary care. EHR-based decision support may improve adherence. Defining evidence-based components of pediatric suicide prevention remains critical.

超越风险识别:坚持在初级保健儿科自杀预防途径。
目的:评估儿童初级保健对结构化自杀预防途径的依从性,并描述自杀风险评估后的管理实践。方法:我们对2022-2024年在某城市学术儿科诊所就诊的12-21岁青少年进行了回顾性横断面研究。本研究采用青少年患者健康问卷(PHQ-A)和哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表(C-SSRS)进行自杀风险评估。电子健康记录(EHR)数据评估了路径组件的依从性,补充图表审查表征了管理实践,包括安全规划和急诊室转诊。多变量回归检查了与依从性相关的患者、提供者和系统层面的因素。结果:3440例访视中,PHQ-A完成率为84.8%。8.6%的人有自杀风险,57.8%的人接受了C-SSRS。当触发EHR警报时,79%的人完成了C-SSRS,而11%的人没有警报(p < 0.001)。年龄较大的青少年接受C-SSRS评估的可能性较小(aRR=0.93; 95% CI: 0.89-0.97)。在低或中等C-SSRS风险水平的青少年中,20.8%的人有完整的六步协作安全计划文件。手工图表审查确定了除依从性指标之外的其他与自杀相关的管理实践,包括部分安全规划、行为健康参与、转介到精神卫生服务机构以及持续的精神卫生治疗。结论:自杀预防途径可以支持儿科初级保健中自杀风险的识别、评估和管理。基于电子病历的决策支持可以提高依从性。确定儿童自杀预防的循证组成部分仍然至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书