Jing Zhu, Aohan Zhang, Xiaowei Li, Yizhou Li, Bin Hu
{"title":"AMGFM: A multimodal fusion model for depression identification based on adversarial metric learning.","authors":"Jing Zhu, Aohan Zhang, Xiaowei Li, Yizhou Li, Bin Hu","doi":"10.1007/s11517-026-03676-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early detection of depression is essential for timely intervention, yet objective assessment remains difficult. Recent studies have explored multimodal physiological signals, including electroencephalography (EEG), eye movement, and pupil dynamics, to improve depression recognition. However, existing multimodal approaches still face two major limitations: insufficient alignment across heterogeneous modalities, which results in modality-dependent feature representations, and limited systematic analysis of how emotional stimuli and cross-modal interactions affect recognition performance, thereby constraining both accuracy and interpretability. To address these issues, we propose AMGFM, an Adversarial-Metric Graph Fusion Model for multimodal depression recognition. AMGFM uses adversarial learning to reduce global distribution discrepancies across modalities and metric learning to enforce intra-class compactness and inter-class separability in a shared latent space. In addition, a hierarchical graph fusion module explicitly models and adaptively integrates unimodal, bimodal, and trimodal interactions to exploit complementary information. Experiments on EFVP and AADP demonstrate that AMGFM consistently outperforms unimodal baselines and representative multimodal fusion approaches, achieving up to 90.33% accuracy. Further analyses indicate that neutral stimuli provide stronger discriminative cues than emotional stimuli, and that EEG serves as an effective target modality for aligning other signals.</p>","PeriodicalId":49840,"journal":{"name":"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-026-03676-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Early detection of depression is essential for timely intervention, yet objective assessment remains difficult. Recent studies have explored multimodal physiological signals, including electroencephalography (EEG), eye movement, and pupil dynamics, to improve depression recognition. However, existing multimodal approaches still face two major limitations: insufficient alignment across heterogeneous modalities, which results in modality-dependent feature representations, and limited systematic analysis of how emotional stimuli and cross-modal interactions affect recognition performance, thereby constraining both accuracy and interpretability. To address these issues, we propose AMGFM, an Adversarial-Metric Graph Fusion Model for multimodal depression recognition. AMGFM uses adversarial learning to reduce global distribution discrepancies across modalities and metric learning to enforce intra-class compactness and inter-class separability in a shared latent space. In addition, a hierarchical graph fusion module explicitly models and adaptively integrates unimodal, bimodal, and trimodal interactions to exploit complementary information. Experiments on EFVP and AADP demonstrate that AMGFM consistently outperforms unimodal baselines and representative multimodal fusion approaches, achieving up to 90.33% accuracy. Further analyses indicate that neutral stimuli provide stronger discriminative cues than emotional stimuli, and that EEG serves as an effective target modality for aligning other signals.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1963, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing (MBEC) continues to serve the biomedical engineering community, covering the entire spectrum of biomedical and clinical engineering. The journal presents exciting and vital experimental and theoretical developments in biomedical science and technology, and reports on advances in computer-based methodologies in these multidisciplinary subjects. The journal also incorporates new and evolving technologies including cellular engineering and molecular imaging.
MBEC publishes original research articles as well as reviews and technical notes. Its Rapid Communications category focuses on material of immediate value to the readership, while the Controversies section provides a forum to exchange views on selected issues, stimulating a vigorous and informed debate in this exciting and high profile field.
MBEC is an official journal of the International Federation of Medical and Biological Engineering (IFMBE).