Healing the Moral Self: Al-Ghazālī's Psychology of the Heart and Moral Injury, with Implications for Muslim Mental Health and Spiritual Care in Indonesia.

IF 2.2 1区 哲学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ade Kosasih, Iyus Yosep, Undang Ahmad Darsa, Rohman Hikmat, Muntazhar Nur Syabana, Roxsana Devi Tumanggor
{"title":"Healing the Moral Self: Al-Ghazālī's Psychology of the Heart and Moral Injury, with Implications for Muslim Mental Health and Spiritual Care in Indonesia.","authors":"Ade Kosasih, Iyus Yosep, Undang Ahmad Darsa, Rohman Hikmat, Muntazhar Nur Syabana, Roxsana Devi Tumanggor","doi":"10.1007/s10943-026-02804-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Moral injury refers to enduring moral, relational, existential, and spiritual suffering that may follow experiences perceived as violating deeply held moral commitments. This philosophical and conceptual study examines whether the moral psychology of Abū Ḥāmid Al-Ghazālī (1058-1111) can provide a complementary framework for understanding moral wounding and spiritual repair, with Indonesia treated as a context of potential application rather than an empirically validated setting. The analysis uses purposive conceptual synthesis and close reading of selected books of Iḥyā' 'Ulūm al-Dīn, especially The Marvels of the Heart, On Disciplining the Soul, On Repentance, Fear and Hope, and On Vigilance and Self-Examination, in dialogue with contemporary scholarship on moral injury, Islamic psychology, religion, and spiritual care. The synthesis suggests that moral injury can be interpreted, within a Ghazālian anthropology, as a disturbance in the moral orientation of the qalb involving responsibility, self-condemnation, alienation, and rupture in relationships with God, self, and community. Spiritual repair is conceptualized as an iterative movement among truthful moral recognition, proportionate responsibility, nadam, tawba, reparative action, divine mercy, renewed rajā', and relational reintegration. In Indonesia, the framework has potential relevance because religious and spiritual meanings remain salient in mental healthcare and Ghazālian moral-spiritual ideas retain resonance within some pesantren settings. The framework is hypothesis-generating: it is not proposed as a substitute for psychological treatment or as a clinical protocol, but as a culturally and theologically grounded vocabulary for future research and carefully assessed spiritually integrated care among Muslim populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48054,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religion & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Religion & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-026-02804-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Moral injury refers to enduring moral, relational, existential, and spiritual suffering that may follow experiences perceived as violating deeply held moral commitments. This philosophical and conceptual study examines whether the moral psychology of Abū Ḥāmid Al-Ghazālī (1058-1111) can provide a complementary framework for understanding moral wounding and spiritual repair, with Indonesia treated as a context of potential application rather than an empirically validated setting. The analysis uses purposive conceptual synthesis and close reading of selected books of Iḥyā' 'Ulūm al-Dīn, especially The Marvels of the Heart, On Disciplining the Soul, On Repentance, Fear and Hope, and On Vigilance and Self-Examination, in dialogue with contemporary scholarship on moral injury, Islamic psychology, religion, and spiritual care. The synthesis suggests that moral injury can be interpreted, within a Ghazālian anthropology, as a disturbance in the moral orientation of the qalb involving responsibility, self-condemnation, alienation, and rupture in relationships with God, self, and community. Spiritual repair is conceptualized as an iterative movement among truthful moral recognition, proportionate responsibility, nadam, tawba, reparative action, divine mercy, renewed rajā', and relational reintegration. In Indonesia, the framework has potential relevance because religious and spiritual meanings remain salient in mental healthcare and Ghazālian moral-spiritual ideas retain resonance within some pesantren settings. The framework is hypothesis-generating: it is not proposed as a substitute for psychological treatment or as a clinical protocol, but as a culturally and theologically grounded vocabulary for future research and carefully assessed spiritually integrated care among Muslim populations.

治愈道德自我:Al-Ghazālī的心脏和道德伤害的心理,与暗示穆斯林的心理健康和精神护理在印度尼西亚。
道德伤害指的是在经历被认为违反了深深持有的道德承诺之后所遭受的持久的道德、关系、存在和精神上的痛苦。这一哲学和概念研究考察了abui Ḥāmid Al-Ghazālī(1058-1111)的道德心理学是否可以为理解道德伤害和精神修复提供一个补充框架,并将印度尼西亚视为潜在应用的背景,而不是经验验证的背景。分析使用有目的的概念综合和仔细阅读Iḥyā‘ ’Ulūm al- d n的精选书籍,特别是《心灵的奇迹》,《关于训练灵魂》,《关于忏悔,恐惧和希望》,《关于警惕和自我检查》,与当代关于道德伤害,伊斯兰心理学,宗教和精神关怀的学术对话。综合表明,在Ghazālian人类学中,道德伤害可以被解释为对道德取向的干扰,涉及责任、自我谴责、异化和与上帝、自我和社区的关系破裂。精神修复的概念是在真实的道德认知、相称的责任、纳达姆、托瓦、修复行动、神圣的怜悯、更新的拉贾伊和关系的重新整合之间的迭代运动。在印度尼西亚,该框架具有潜在的相关性,因为宗教和精神意义在精神保健中仍然突出,Ghazālian道德-精神观念在一些人的环境中保持共鸣。该框架产生了假设:它不是作为心理治疗或临床方案的替代品提出的,而是作为一种文化和神学基础的词汇,用于未来的研究,并仔细评估穆斯林人群的精神综合护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
21.40%
发文量
220
期刊介绍: Journal of Religion and Health is an international publication concerned with the creative partnership of psychology and religion/sprituality and the relationship between religion/spirituality and both mental and physical health. This multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary journal publishes peer-reviewed original contributions from scholars and professionals of all religious faiths. Articles may be clinical, statistical, theoretical, impressionistic, or anecdotal. Founded in 1961 by the Blanton-Peale Institute, which joins the perspectives of psychology and religion, Journal of Religion and Health explores the most contemporary modes of religious thought with particular emphasis on their relevance to current medical and psychological research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书