Positive Gains in Job Crafting Behavior, Self-Efficacy, and Work Performance Among U.S. Workers with Disabilities Who Participated in a Job Crafting Intervention.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Vidya Sundar, Debra L Brucker
{"title":"Positive Gains in Job Crafting Behavior, Self-Efficacy, and Work Performance Among U.S. Workers with Disabilities Who Participated in a Job Crafting Intervention.","authors":"Vidya Sundar, Debra L Brucker","doi":"10.1007/s10926-026-10454-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to test whether a 6-week job crafting intervention would increase the use of job crafting behaviors and improve self-efficacy, work engagement, and work performance for workers who have mild cognitive or physical limitations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 75 workers with mild cognitive or physical disabilities in a 6-week job crafting intervention in 2020-2021. All participants received the intervention. We supplemented an existing workbook approach to job crafting with brief remote (phone or web-based) coaching to help workers identify actionable and measurable goals and to track their progress in meeting those goals. Over a period of six weeks, weekly online check-ins measured changes in self-efficacy, work engagement, and work performance from baseline. We used paired t-tests to test for changes in job crafting behaviors from pre-intervention to Week 6. We used fixed-effects models to test for statistically significant changes in self-efficacy, work engagement, and work performance that were measured weekly over the intervention period, controlling for work limitations and goal attainment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found statistically significant improvements in job crafting behaviors (t=2.694, p=.005), self-efficacy (p<.01), and work performance (p<.01) but did not find statistically significant changes in work engagement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, these results suggest that job crafting interventions hold promise for helping workers with limitations to perform at higher levels in the workplace.</p>","PeriodicalId":48035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13711415/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-026-10454-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to test whether a 6-week job crafting intervention would increase the use of job crafting behaviors and improve self-efficacy, work engagement, and work performance for workers who have mild cognitive or physical limitations.

Methods: We enrolled 75 workers with mild cognitive or physical disabilities in a 6-week job crafting intervention in 2020-2021. All participants received the intervention. We supplemented an existing workbook approach to job crafting with brief remote (phone or web-based) coaching to help workers identify actionable and measurable goals and to track their progress in meeting those goals. Over a period of six weeks, weekly online check-ins measured changes in self-efficacy, work engagement, and work performance from baseline. We used paired t-tests to test for changes in job crafting behaviors from pre-intervention to Week 6. We used fixed-effects models to test for statistically significant changes in self-efficacy, work engagement, and work performance that were measured weekly over the intervention period, controlling for work limitations and goal attainment.

Results: We found statistically significant improvements in job crafting behaviors (t=2.694, p=.005), self-efficacy (p<.01), and work performance (p<.01) but did not find statistically significant changes in work engagement.

Conclusion: Overall, these results suggest that job crafting interventions hold promise for helping workers with limitations to perform at higher levels in the workplace.

美国残障工人参与工作制作干预的工作制作行为、自我效能和工作表现的正面收益。
目的:我们旨在测试为期6周的工作制作干预是否会增加工作制作行为的使用,并提高有轻度认知或身体限制的员工的自我效能感、工作投入和工作绩效。方法:我们招募了75名轻度认知或身体残疾的工人,在2020-2021年进行为期6周的工作制作干预。所有参与者都接受了干预。我们用简短的远程(电话或网络)指导来补充现有的工作手册方法,帮助员工确定可操作和可衡量的目标,并跟踪他们在实现这些目标方面的进展。在为期六周的时间里,每周在线检查从基线测量自我效能、工作投入和工作绩效的变化。我们使用配对t检验来检验从干预前到第6周工作制作行为的变化。我们使用固定效应模型来检验自我效能、工作投入和工作绩效的统计显著变化,这些变化在干预期间每周测量一次,控制了工作限制和目标实现。结果:我们发现在工作制定行为(t=2.694, p= 0.005)和自我效能(p)方面有统计学上显著的改善。结论:总的来说,这些结果表明,工作制定干预措施有望帮助有限制的员工在工作场所的更高层次上表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on the rehabilitation, reintegration, and prevention of disability in workers. The journal offers investigations involving original data collection and research synthesis (i.e., scoping reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses). Papers derive from a broad array of fields including rehabilitation medicine, physical and occupational therapy, health psychology and psychiatry, orthopedics, oncology, occupational and insurance medicine, neurology, social work, ergonomics, biomedical engineering, health economics, rehabilitation engineering, business administration and management, and law.  A single interdisciplinary source for information on work disability rehabilitation, the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation helps to advance the scientific understanding, management, and prevention of work disability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书