The Publication and Dissemination of Books on Cowpox Vaccination and Changes in the Perception of Vaccination in Early 19th Century China - Focusing on Xiyang Zhongdou Lun (Western Vaccination Theory) and Yindulue (A Brief Treatise on Vaccination).

IF 0.4 4区 哲学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Seongsu Kim
{"title":"The Publication and Dissemination of Books on Cowpox Vaccination and Changes in the Perception of Vaccination in Early 19<sup>th</sup> Century China - Focusing on Xiyang Zhongdou Lun (Western Vaccination Theory) and Yindulue (A Brief Treatise on Vaccination).","authors":"Seongsu Kim","doi":"10.13081/kjmh.2026.35.811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 1805, Alexander Pearson administered the cowpox vaccine, which had been transported to Macau, to the Chinese people, marking the beginning of the first cowpox vaccinations in China. Under the patronage of Zheng Chongqian, Pearson published Yingjili-guo Xinchu Zhongdou Qishu (A Wonderful Book on the Newly Discovered Method of Vaccination in England), the first book on cowpox vaccination in China, while concurrently passing down the vaccination method to four Chinese individuals: Liang Hui, Qiu Xi, Zhang Yao, and Tan Guo. Notably, Qiu Xi authored Yindulue (A Brief Treatise on Vaccination), successfully spreading awareness of cowpox vaccination throughout China, and its influence was so immense that it was reprinted dozens of times throughout the 19th century following its first publication in 1817. However, looking strictly at the first half of the 19th century, the process of spreading the cowpox vaccination method was far from easy. The area where it was introduced was the southernmost region of China, and the process of expanding its reach and propagating outward from there was sluggish. During this period, the greatest catalyst for the dissemination of cowpox vaccination was Qiu Xi's Yindulue. Although works like Zhongdou Qishu and Xiyang Zhongdou Lun existed prior to Yindulue, it was Yindulue that achieved massive success by providing appropriate solutions to various practical problems that arose during the spread of cowpox. Qiu Xi's interpretation of cowpox vaccination using traditional medical theories, an approach for which he is highly credited, was a continuation and development of the attempts made in Xiyang Zhongdou Lun. Unlike Huang Anhui, who attributed the cause of smallpox to \"heart fire\" (xinhua), Qiu Xi focused on \"fetal toxin\" (taidu), a concept easily understood by the general public, which seems to have garnered much greater public consensus. However, the enduring popularity and widespread use of Yindulue can also be attributed to other practical aspects presented in the text, such as the operational guidelines for vaccination bureaus-including establishing vaccination cycles for lymph (dumiao) harvesting and managing gratuities-as well as implementing measures to prevent infectious diseases to ensure the safety of the lymph, and improving preservation methods to extend its storage life. The dissemination process of cowpox vaccination is also closely tied to the reprinting of Yindulue, and an analysis of the texts included in the book reveals several key facts. First, the introduction of cowpox vaccination to Beijing around 1828 was a milestone event in its dissemination. This meant that the spread of vaccination did not rely solely on moving northward from the stronghold of Guangdong, but rather, transmission originating from Beijing also played a major role. While Guangdong was a remote region at the southernmost tip of China, Beijing was the capital of the Qing Dynasty and the political and economic center, which gave it a far greater sphere of influence. Second, within Yindulue and the broader dissemination process, subtle signs of a perceptual shift began to emerge, moving away from traditional medicine that emphasized culture toward a modern mindset that prioritized trials and results. Although the vaccination technique was wrapped in the outer garment of traditional medicine in terms of its technical aspects, underneath lay a latent shift in perception that approached the experimental medicine pursued by Western medical science. This created a peculiar entanglement between the West and China, and between modernity and tradition, reflecting a facet of the 19th-century Chinese intellectual world. This complexity is evident because, alongside the main text written by Qiu Xi, Yindulue contains various writings left by a diverse range of figures who took the lead in printing and promoting the book.</p>","PeriodicalId":42441,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Medical History","volume":"35 2","pages":"811-870"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13631481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Medical History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13081/kjmh.2026.35.811","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1805, Alexander Pearson administered the cowpox vaccine, which had been transported to Macau, to the Chinese people, marking the beginning of the first cowpox vaccinations in China. Under the patronage of Zheng Chongqian, Pearson published Yingjili-guo Xinchu Zhongdou Qishu (A Wonderful Book on the Newly Discovered Method of Vaccination in England), the first book on cowpox vaccination in China, while concurrently passing down the vaccination method to four Chinese individuals: Liang Hui, Qiu Xi, Zhang Yao, and Tan Guo. Notably, Qiu Xi authored Yindulue (A Brief Treatise on Vaccination), successfully spreading awareness of cowpox vaccination throughout China, and its influence was so immense that it was reprinted dozens of times throughout the 19th century following its first publication in 1817. However, looking strictly at the first half of the 19th century, the process of spreading the cowpox vaccination method was far from easy. The area where it was introduced was the southernmost region of China, and the process of expanding its reach and propagating outward from there was sluggish. During this period, the greatest catalyst for the dissemination of cowpox vaccination was Qiu Xi's Yindulue. Although works like Zhongdou Qishu and Xiyang Zhongdou Lun existed prior to Yindulue, it was Yindulue that achieved massive success by providing appropriate solutions to various practical problems that arose during the spread of cowpox. Qiu Xi's interpretation of cowpox vaccination using traditional medical theories, an approach for which he is highly credited, was a continuation and development of the attempts made in Xiyang Zhongdou Lun. Unlike Huang Anhui, who attributed the cause of smallpox to "heart fire" (xinhua), Qiu Xi focused on "fetal toxin" (taidu), a concept easily understood by the general public, which seems to have garnered much greater public consensus. However, the enduring popularity and widespread use of Yindulue can also be attributed to other practical aspects presented in the text, such as the operational guidelines for vaccination bureaus-including establishing vaccination cycles for lymph (dumiao) harvesting and managing gratuities-as well as implementing measures to prevent infectious diseases to ensure the safety of the lymph, and improving preservation methods to extend its storage life. The dissemination process of cowpox vaccination is also closely tied to the reprinting of Yindulue, and an analysis of the texts included in the book reveals several key facts. First, the introduction of cowpox vaccination to Beijing around 1828 was a milestone event in its dissemination. This meant that the spread of vaccination did not rely solely on moving northward from the stronghold of Guangdong, but rather, transmission originating from Beijing also played a major role. While Guangdong was a remote region at the southernmost tip of China, Beijing was the capital of the Qing Dynasty and the political and economic center, which gave it a far greater sphere of influence. Second, within Yindulue and the broader dissemination process, subtle signs of a perceptual shift began to emerge, moving away from traditional medicine that emphasized culture toward a modern mindset that prioritized trials and results. Although the vaccination technique was wrapped in the outer garment of traditional medicine in terms of its technical aspects, underneath lay a latent shift in perception that approached the experimental medicine pursued by Western medical science. This created a peculiar entanglement between the West and China, and between modernity and tradition, reflecting a facet of the 19th-century Chinese intellectual world. This complexity is evident because, alongside the main text written by Qiu Xi, Yindulue contains various writings left by a diverse range of figures who took the lead in printing and promoting the book.

19世纪初中国牛痘接种论著的出版、传播与接种观念的变化——以《西阳接种论》和《种痘简论》为中心。
1805年,亚历山大·皮尔森将运到澳门的牛痘疫苗接种给中国人,标志着中国第一次接种牛痘疫苗的开始。在郑崇谦的赞助下,皮尔森出版了中国第一本关于牛痘疫苗接种的书《英吉里-郭新初中窦奇书》,同时将牛痘疫苗接种方法传给了梁辉、邱夕、张瑶、谭过四位中国人。值得注意的是,邱熹撰写的《种痘简论》成功地在中国传播了牛痘疫苗接种的意识,其影响如此巨大,以至于自1817年首次出版以来,在整个19世纪被重印了几十次。然而,严格地看19世纪上半叶,牛痘疫苗接种方法的传播过程远非易事。它的传入地区是中国的最南端,从那里向外扩张和传播的过程缓慢。在这一时期,牛痘疫苗传播的最大催化剂是邱熙的《阴都露》。虽然《中豆七书》、《西阳中豆论》等著作早于《阴都律》,但真正取得巨大成功的是《阴都律》,它对牛痘传播过程中出现的各种实际问题提供了适当的解决方案。邱夕用传统医学理论解释牛痘疫苗接种,是《西阳中斗论》尝试的延续和发展,这一方法受到高度赞扬。与黄安徽将天花的病因归结为“心火”(新华社)不同,邱曦关注的是“胎毒”,这是一个容易被公众理解的概念,似乎获得了更多的公众共识。然而,银都露的持久流行和广泛使用也可归因于文本中提出的其他实际方面,例如疫苗接种局的操作指南-包括建立淋巴(dumiao)采集的疫苗接种周期和管理小费-以及实施预防传染病的措施以确保淋巴的安全,以及改进保存方法以延长其储存寿命。牛痘疫苗的传播过程也与《yinduue》的重印密切相关,对书中文本的分析揭示了几个关键事实。首先,牛痘疫苗在1828年前后传入北京,是牛痘传播的一个里程碑事件。这意味着疫苗的传播并不仅仅依赖于从广东的据点向北传播,而是来自北京的传播也发挥了重要作用。广东是中国最南端的一个偏远地区,而北京是清朝的首都和政治经济中心,这给了它更大的影响范围。其次,在yinduue和更广泛的传播过程中,观念转变的微妙迹象开始出现,从强调文化的传统医学转向重视试验和结果的现代思维方式。虽然疫苗接种技术在技术方面被包裹在传统医学的外衣下,但其背后潜藏着一种接近西方医学所追求的实验医学的观念转变。这在西方与中国、现代与传统之间造成了一种奇特的纠缠,反映了19世纪中国知识界的一个侧面。这种复杂性是显而易见的,因为除了邱夕写的主要文本外,《胤都录》还包含了各种各样的人物留下的各种文字,这些人物领导了这本书的印刷和推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书