Non-Stop: A Decade of Integrating Health Systems Science Into Emergency Medicine Residency

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Cedric Dark, Sara Andrabi, Vidya Eswaran
{"title":"Non-Stop: A Decade of Integrating Health Systems Science Into Emergency Medicine Residency","authors":"Cedric Dark,&nbsp;Sara Andrabi,&nbsp;Vidya Eswaran","doi":"10.1002/aet2.70255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Despite the growing importance of Health Systems Science (HSS), many emergency medicine (EM) residency programs lack a formal, comprehensive curriculum for health policy and advocacy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We developed a longitudinal Health Policy and Advocacy curriculum by mapping core components, based off those originally proposed in the <i>New England Journal of Medicine</i>, to ACGME milestones. The components were refined through expert ranking by physicians attending the ACEP Teaching Fellowship to identify high-yield topics specific to emergency medicine, such as the health care safety net, medical malpractice, and physician reimbursement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The resulting curriculum encompasses six key domains: adverse events, medical errors and malpractice; health care safety net; quality indicators, measures, and outcomes; physician reimbursement; U.S. health care system, financing, and delivery; and the business of emergency medicine. Curricular implementation utilizes several different teaching models, incorporating asynchronous modules, didactic sessions, a coding and billing workshop, and a four-hour mock trial.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Integrating a structured health policy curriculum into EM training provides residents with essential non-clinical skills that are increasingly necessary to effective practice in today's health care environment. This innovation addresses a critical educational gap, preparing residents to become vocal advocates for their patients and the profession.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"10 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.70255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Despite the growing importance of Health Systems Science (HSS), many emergency medicine (EM) residency programs lack a formal, comprehensive curriculum for health policy and advocacy.

Methods

We developed a longitudinal Health Policy and Advocacy curriculum by mapping core components, based off those originally proposed in the New England Journal of Medicine, to ACGME milestones. The components were refined through expert ranking by physicians attending the ACEP Teaching Fellowship to identify high-yield topics specific to emergency medicine, such as the health care safety net, medical malpractice, and physician reimbursement.

Results

The resulting curriculum encompasses six key domains: adverse events, medical errors and malpractice; health care safety net; quality indicators, measures, and outcomes; physician reimbursement; U.S. health care system, financing, and delivery; and the business of emergency medicine. Curricular implementation utilizes several different teaching models, incorporating asynchronous modules, didactic sessions, a coding and billing workshop, and a four-hour mock trial.

Conclusions

Integrating a structured health policy curriculum into EM training provides residents with essential non-clinical skills that are increasingly necessary to effective practice in today's health care environment. This innovation addresses a critical educational gap, preparing residents to become vocal advocates for their patients and the profession.

不间断:将卫生系统科学融入急诊医学住院医师的十年。
背景:尽管卫生系统科学(HSS)越来越重要,但许多急诊医学(EM)住院医师项目缺乏正式的、全面的卫生政策和宣传课程。方法:我们根据最初在《新英格兰医学杂志》上提出的内容,将核心内容映射到ACGME里程碑,从而开发了一个纵向的卫生政策和倡导课程。这些组成部分是由参加ACEP教学奖学金的医生通过专家排名来完善的,以确定特定于急诊医学的高收益主题,如卫生保健安全网、医疗事故和医生报销。结果:由此产生的课程包括六个关键领域:不良事件,医疗差错和医疗事故;保健安全网;质量指标、措施和结果;医生报销;美国卫生保健系统、融资和交付;以及急诊医疗业务。课程实施采用了几种不同的教学模式,包括异步模块、教学课程、编码和计费研讨会以及四小时的模拟审判。结论:将结构化的卫生政策课程整合到EM培训中,为住院医师提供了必要的非临床技能,这对于当今卫生保健环境中的有效实践越来越必要。这一创新解决了一个关键的教育差距,使住院医生成为他们的病人和职业的声音倡导者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书