Pediatric Institutions' Instagram Response to the 2025 Acetaminophen-Autism Controversy.

IF 2.2 Q1 Nursing
Katherine Poole, Jessica Visone, Shivani Srivastava, Kathryn Whitehill
{"title":"Pediatric Institutions' Instagram Response to the 2025 Acetaminophen-Autism Controversy.","authors":"Katherine Poole, Jessica Visone, Shivani Srivastava, Kathryn Whitehill","doi":"10.1542/hpeds.2026-009767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Objective: To describe the timing, frequency, and accessibility of Instagram posts from pediatric health institutions during the 2025 acetaminophen-autism controversy.Methods: Cross-sectional audit of public Instagram accounts of 62 pediatric health institutions from September 22 to November 15, 2025. The a priori sampling frame comprised the top 50 US children's hospitals for pediatric behavioral health, the top 10 Honor Roll children's hospitals (US News and World Report), 5 national medical societies, and health departments of the 10 states with the largest pediatric populations. Posts were extracted with a web-scraping tool and manually verified. Two reviewers independently coded relevant posts for prespecified content and accessibility features. Readability was assessed with two validated measures.Results: Twelve of 62 institutions (19%) posted relevant content. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists posted on day 0, while hospital time to first post ranged from 3 to 51 days. No state health department posted. Nonresponding institutions remained active: 1 hospital published 108 unrelated posts. The 26 relevant posts had a mean Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level of 11.4 and SMOG Index of 10.2. Among coded features, 88% included resource links, 73% directed audiences to a health care provider, 46% featured a named clinician, 42% discussed risks and benefits, and none were multilingual.Conclusions: Most sampled institutions published no relevant content during an active health controversy despite remaining active. Readability of relevant posts exceeded recommended targets, and none were multilingual. These gaps in institutional communication infrastructure could be addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":38180,"journal":{"name":"Hospital pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2026-009767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To describe the timing, frequency, and accessibility of Instagram posts from pediatric health institutions during the 2025 acetaminophen-autism controversy.Methods: Cross-sectional audit of public Instagram accounts of 62 pediatric health institutions from September 22 to November 15, 2025. The a priori sampling frame comprised the top 50 US children's hospitals for pediatric behavioral health, the top 10 Honor Roll children's hospitals (US News and World Report), 5 national medical societies, and health departments of the 10 states with the largest pediatric populations. Posts were extracted with a web-scraping tool and manually verified. Two reviewers independently coded relevant posts for prespecified content and accessibility features. Readability was assessed with two validated measures.Results: Twelve of 62 institutions (19%) posted relevant content. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists posted on day 0, while hospital time to first post ranged from 3 to 51 days. No state health department posted. Nonresponding institutions remained active: 1 hospital published 108 unrelated posts. The 26 relevant posts had a mean Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level of 11.4 and SMOG Index of 10.2. Among coded features, 88% included resource links, 73% directed audiences to a health care provider, 46% featured a named clinician, 42% discussed risks and benefits, and none were multilingual.Conclusions: Most sampled institutions published no relevant content during an active health controversy despite remaining active. Readability of relevant posts exceeded recommended targets, and none were multilingual. These gaps in institutional communication infrastructure could be addressed.

儿科机构在Instagram上对2025年扑热息痛与自闭症争议的回应。
摘要:目的:描述2025年对乙酰氨基酚与自闭症争议期间儿科卫生机构Instagram帖子的时间、频率和可及性。方法:对2025年9月22日至11月15日62家儿科卫生机构Instagram公众账号进行横断面审计。先验抽样框架包括美国儿童行为健康排名前50的儿童医院,排名前10的儿童医院荣誉榜(《美国新闻与世界报道》),5个国家医学协会,以及儿科人口最多的10个州的卫生部门。帖子是用网络抓取工具提取并手动验证的。两名审稿人独立编写了预先指定的内容和可访问性功能的相关帖子。用两种有效的方法评估可读性。结果:62家机构中有12家(19%)发布了相关内容。美国儿科学会(American Academy of Pediatrics)和美国妇产科学会(American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists)在第0天发布,而首次发布的住院时间从3天到51天不等。没有州卫生部门公布。没有回应的机构仍然活跃:1家医院发布了108条不相关的帖子。26个相关职位的平均Flesch-Kincaid等级为11.4,雾霾指数为10.2。在编码功能中,88%的功能包括资源链接,73%的功能指向医疗服务提供者,46%的功能包含指定的临床医生,42%的功能讨论风险和收益,没有一个功能是多语言的。结论:大多数抽样机构在积极的健康争议期间没有发表相关内容,尽管仍然活跃。相关帖子的可读性超过推荐指标,没有一个是多语种的。可以解决机构通信基础设施方面的这些差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hospital pediatrics
Hospital pediatrics Nursing-Pediatrics
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
204
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书