Beyond clinical complexity: managing risk within a respiratory virtual ward.

Q3 Nursing
British Journal of Community Nursing Pub Date : 2026-10-02 Epub Date: 2026-10-05 DOI:10.12968/bjcn.2026.0087
Ioulia Mariaki, Rory McDermott
{"title":"Beyond clinical complexity: managing risk within a respiratory virtual ward.","authors":"Ioulia Mariaki, Rory McDermott","doi":"10.12968/bjcn.2026.0087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community-based models of care, including respiratory virtual wards and Hospital at Home services, continue to expand across the NHS as part of wider efforts to reduce hospital admissions and deliver acute care closer to home. Alongside increasing clinical acuity, community clinicians are increasingly caring for patients with significant psychosocial complexity, including substance use, safeguarding concerns, unstable housing, poor engagement with treatment and environmental risks. While national policy has focused on expanding community-based models of care, comparatively little guidance exists to support frontline clinicians managing the intersection of clinical, psychosocial, safeguarding and workforce safety risks within patients' homes.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This article describes the development and early implementation of a structured risk-assessment framework designed to support safer, more consistent and defensible decision making when managing patients with complex psychosocial and environmental needs in a respiratory virtual ward.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The framework was developed as a practice-based quality improvement initiative through frontline clinical experience, multidisciplinary collaboration, reflective practice, review of governance processes and relevant national guidance relating to safeguarding, lone working and workforce safety. Following implementation, a 3-month feasibility pilot involving seven patients presenting with complex clinical, psychosocial and safeguarding needs was undertaken to evaluate the framework's usability in routine practice and inform future service evaluation.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Early implementation improved consistency of decision making, multidisciplinary communication, documentation and staff confidence when managing complex situations. Formal evaluation of patient-level and service-level outcomes is planned.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As community-based healthcare continues to evolve, structured operational frameworks may support safer clinical decision making while balancing patient-centred care, safeguarding responsibilities and workforce safety. Further evaluation is required to determine the framework's effectiveness and wider applicability across community healthcare services.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>The pilot indicates that the framework is feasible for implementation and can be applied consistently in routine clinical practice, supporting structured multidisciplinary discussions, tailored risk mitigation strategies and strengthened governance oversight.</p>","PeriodicalId":35731,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Community Nursing","volume":"31 10","pages":"465-470"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Community Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2026.0087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Community-based models of care, including respiratory virtual wards and Hospital at Home services, continue to expand across the NHS as part of wider efforts to reduce hospital admissions and deliver acute care closer to home. Alongside increasing clinical acuity, community clinicians are increasingly caring for patients with significant psychosocial complexity, including substance use, safeguarding concerns, unstable housing, poor engagement with treatment and environmental risks. While national policy has focused on expanding community-based models of care, comparatively little guidance exists to support frontline clinicians managing the intersection of clinical, psychosocial, safeguarding and workforce safety risks within patients' homes.

Aims: This article describes the development and early implementation of a structured risk-assessment framework designed to support safer, more consistent and defensible decision making when managing patients with complex psychosocial and environmental needs in a respiratory virtual ward.

Methods: The framework was developed as a practice-based quality improvement initiative through frontline clinical experience, multidisciplinary collaboration, reflective practice, review of governance processes and relevant national guidance relating to safeguarding, lone working and workforce safety. Following implementation, a 3-month feasibility pilot involving seven patients presenting with complex clinical, psychosocial and safeguarding needs was undertaken to evaluate the framework's usability in routine practice and inform future service evaluation.

Findings: Early implementation improved consistency of decision making, multidisciplinary communication, documentation and staff confidence when managing complex situations. Formal evaluation of patient-level and service-level outcomes is planned.

Conclusions: As community-based healthcare continues to evolve, structured operational frameworks may support safer clinical decision making while balancing patient-centred care, safeguarding responsibilities and workforce safety. Further evaluation is required to determine the framework's effectiveness and wider applicability across community healthcare services.

Implications for practice: The pilot indicates that the framework is feasible for implementation and can be applied consistently in routine clinical practice, supporting structured multidisciplinary discussions, tailored risk mitigation strategies and strengthened governance oversight.

超越临床复杂性:管理呼吸系统虚拟病房内的风险。
背景:以社区为基础的护理模式,包括呼吸系统虚拟病房和家庭医院服务,作为减少住院人数和提供离家更近的急性护理的更广泛努力的一部分,继续在整个NHS中扩展。随着临床敏锐度的提高,社区临床医生越来越多地照顾具有严重心理社会复杂性的患者,包括药物使用、保障问题、不稳定的住房、对治疗的不良参与和环境风险。虽然国家政策的重点是扩大以社区为基础的护理模式,但支持一线临床医生在患者家中管理临床、心理社会、保障和劳动力安全风险的指导相对较少。目的:本文描述了结构化风险评估框架的开发和早期实施,旨在支持在呼吸虚拟病房中管理具有复杂心理社会和环境需求的患者时更安全,更一致和可辩护的决策。方法:该框架是通过一线临床经验、多学科合作、反思实践、治理流程审查以及与保障、单独工作和劳动力安全相关的国家指导,作为基于实践的质量改进倡议而开发的。实施后,对7名具有复杂临床、心理社会和保障需求的患者进行了为期3个月的可行性试点,以评估该框架在日常实践中的可用性,并为未来的服务评估提供信息。发现:早期实施改进了决策的一致性、多学科沟通、文件编制和工作人员在管理复杂情况时的信心。计划对患者水平和服务水平的结果进行正式评估。结论:随着社区医疗保健的不断发展,结构化的操作框架可能支持更安全的临床决策,同时平衡以患者为中心的护理、保障责任和劳动力安全。需要进一步评估以确定该框架的有效性和在社区保健服务中的更广泛适用性。对实践的影响:试点表明,该框架是可行的,可以在常规临床实践中始终如一地应用,支持结构化的多学科讨论、量身定制的风险缓解战略和加强治理监督。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Community Nursing
British Journal of Community Nursing Nursing-Community and Home Care
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
179
期刊介绍: British Journal of Community Nursing (BJCN) is the UK"s leading peer-reviewed journal for district nurses, containing the most up-to-date clinical coverage and research on primary care nursing. The journal promotes excellence in clinical practice with an emphasis on the sharing of expertise and innovation in district nursing. Articles are written by nurses from across the community nursing spectrum, and peer-reviewed by leading authorities in primary care to make sure that the journal addresses all aspects of the profession in a way that is relevant, intelligent and accessible, and so useful in daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书