Evaluation of an Enhanced Modified Kalman Filter Approach for Estimating Health Outcomes in Small Subpopulations.

Q1 Mathematics
Lauren M Rossen, Makram Talih, Priyam Patel, Morgan Earp, Jennifer D Parker
{"title":"Evaluation of an Enhanced Modified Kalman Filter Approach for Estimating Health Outcomes in Small Subpopulations.","authors":"Lauren M Rossen, Makram Talih, Priyam Patel, Morgan Earp, Jennifer D Parker","doi":"10.15620/cdc/157497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Historically, the National Center for Health Statistics has published statistics on a variety of health outcomes by population subgroup, supporting efforts to assess and monitor health disparities in the U.S. population. With small sample or population sizes, however, direct estimates from the Center's data systems may lack precision, limiting the information available for small subpopulations. Small-domain estimation is a methodological approach that can be used to provide more precise model-based estimates of outcomes for small subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This report describes the performance of an updated methodology to estimate health outcomes in small subpopulations using the enhanced modified Kalman filter (eMKF). The eMKF procedure borrows strength across subgroups and over time to produce more precise estimates of health outcomes in small subpopulations. This report evaluates the performance of the eMKF procedure under different scenarios based on simulated data, to quantify differences in accuracy and precision of model-based estimates compared with direct estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using simulated data, model-based estimates using the eMKF Bayesian model averaging approach presented marked improvements in root mean squared error compared with direct estimates, with larger improvements seen for smaller sample sizes. Improvements were seen across a wide array of analytic scenarios, including outcomes with higher or lower prevalence, trends that varied from linear to cubic, trends that were shared or varied by group, as well as trends that involved unequally spaced time points. In all cases, relative root mean squared errors were smaller for eMKF estimates than direct estimates. Gains in equivalent sample size of up to 420% were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Model-based estimates of health outcomes among small subpopulations, where direct estimates may be statistically unreliable, can help inform policies and programs to address disparities in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":23577,"journal":{"name":"Vital and health statistics. Series 2, Data evaluation and methods research","volume":" 208","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vital and health statistics. Series 2, Data evaluation and methods research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc/157497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Historically, the National Center for Health Statistics has published statistics on a variety of health outcomes by population subgroup, supporting efforts to assess and monitor health disparities in the U.S. population. With small sample or population sizes, however, direct estimates from the Center's data systems may lack precision, limiting the information available for small subpopulations. Small-domain estimation is a methodological approach that can be used to provide more precise model-based estimates of outcomes for small subgroups.

Methods: This report describes the performance of an updated methodology to estimate health outcomes in small subpopulations using the enhanced modified Kalman filter (eMKF). The eMKF procedure borrows strength across subgroups and over time to produce more precise estimates of health outcomes in small subpopulations. This report evaluates the performance of the eMKF procedure under different scenarios based on simulated data, to quantify differences in accuracy and precision of model-based estimates compared with direct estimates.

Results: Using simulated data, model-based estimates using the eMKF Bayesian model averaging approach presented marked improvements in root mean squared error compared with direct estimates, with larger improvements seen for smaller sample sizes. Improvements were seen across a wide array of analytic scenarios, including outcomes with higher or lower prevalence, trends that varied from linear to cubic, trends that were shared or varied by group, as well as trends that involved unequally spaced time points. In all cases, relative root mean squared errors were smaller for eMKF estimates than direct estimates. Gains in equivalent sample size of up to 420% were observed.

Conclusions: Model-based estimates of health outcomes among small subpopulations, where direct estimates may be statistically unreliable, can help inform policies and programs to address disparities in the United States.

小亚群健康结果估计的改进卡尔曼滤波方法的评价。
背景:从历史上看,国家卫生统计中心已经按人口亚组发布了各种健康结果的统计数据,支持评估和监测美国人口健康差异的努力。然而,由于样本或人口规模小,中心数据系统的直接估计可能缺乏精度,限制了小亚群的可用信息。小域估计是一种方法方法,可用于为小子组提供更精确的基于模型的结果估计。方法:本报告描述了一种更新的方法的性能,该方法使用增强的改进卡尔曼滤波器(eMKF)估计小亚群的健康结果。eMKF程序利用跨亚群和随时间推移的优势,对小亚群的健康结果进行更精确的估计。本报告基于模拟数据评估了eMKF程序在不同情景下的性能,以量化基于模型的估计与直接估计相比在准确性和精度方面的差异。结果:使用模拟数据,与直接估计相比,使用eMKF贝叶斯模型平均方法的基于模型的估计在均方根误差方面有显着改善,在较小的样本量下可以看到更大的改善。在一系列广泛的分析情景中都可以看到改善,包括患病率较高或较低的结果,从线性到立方变化的趋势,由组共享或变化的趋势,以及涉及不等间隔时间点的趋势。在所有情况下,eMKF估计的相对均方根误差都小于直接估计。观察到等效样本量的增益高达420%。结论:基于模型的小亚人群健康结果估计,其中直接估计可能在统计上不可靠,可以帮助告知政策和计划,以解决美国的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Studies of new statistical methodology including experimental tests of new survey methods, studies of vital statistics collection methods, new analytical techniques, objective evaluations of reliability of collected data, and contributions to statistical theory. Studies also include comparison of U.S. methodology with those of other countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书