Feasibility of a Motor-Cognitive Stepping Training Program During Acute Hospitalization in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management Pub Date : 2026-09-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/TCRM.S599343
Julia Brechbühl, Anne-Katrin Hickmann, Erik Schulz, Alexandra Steurer, Eleftheria Giannouli
{"title":"Feasibility of a Motor-Cognitive Stepping Training Program During Acute Hospitalization in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Julia Brechbühl, Anne-Katrin Hickmann, Erik Schulz, Alexandra Steurer, Eleftheria Giannouli","doi":"10.2147/TCRM.S599343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) survivors often experience mobility issues which are further worsened by cognitive deficits. Dual-task training has shown promising effects in people with TBI. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of the novel training concept \"StepIt\", which addresses motor and cognitive falls-related aspects during acute hospitalization in TBI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Persons admitted to the hospital with a mild to severe TBI received individual training sessions of approximately 15 minutes per session during their hospital stay according to the \"StepIt\" training concept. The main outcome was feasibility as measured by rates of recruitment, inclusion, adherence, compliance, attrition, and safety. Secondary outcomes were training performance and user evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rates for recruitment, adherence, and compliance were 72.9%, 87.5%, and 93.8%, respectively. No intervention-related adverse events occurred during the study period. The inclusion rate was 7.4% and attrition rate was 42.9%. Overall, four of the six predefined feasibility criteria were met, indicating that modifications to the study design are required before proceeding to a larger-scale study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings support the feasibility of StepIt during acute hospitalization in people with TBI, although modifications to the study design are needed. Future studies should examine its feasibility in different settings, such as inpatient or outpatient rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":22977,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","volume":"22 ","pages":"599343"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13634250/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S599343","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) survivors often experience mobility issues which are further worsened by cognitive deficits. Dual-task training has shown promising effects in people with TBI. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of the novel training concept "StepIt", which addresses motor and cognitive falls-related aspects during acute hospitalization in TBI patients.

Methods: Persons admitted to the hospital with a mild to severe TBI received individual training sessions of approximately 15 minutes per session during their hospital stay according to the "StepIt" training concept. The main outcome was feasibility as measured by rates of recruitment, inclusion, adherence, compliance, attrition, and safety. Secondary outcomes were training performance and user evaluation.

Results: Rates for recruitment, adherence, and compliance were 72.9%, 87.5%, and 93.8%, respectively. No intervention-related adverse events occurred during the study period. The inclusion rate was 7.4% and attrition rate was 42.9%. Overall, four of the six predefined feasibility criteria were met, indicating that modifications to the study design are required before proceeding to a larger-scale study.

Conclusion: The findings support the feasibility of StepIt during acute hospitalization in people with TBI, although modifications to the study design are needed. Future studies should examine its feasibility in different settings, such as inpatient or outpatient rehabilitation.

创伤性脑损伤患者急性住院期间运动-认知步进训练方案的可行性。
背景:创伤性脑损伤(TBI)幸存者经常经历活动能力问题,认知缺陷进一步恶化。双任务训练对脑外伤患者有很好的效果。本研究旨在评估新的训练概念“StepIt”的可行性,该概念旨在解决脑损伤患者急性住院期间运动和认知跌倒相关方面的问题。方法:根据“StepIt”培训概念,轻度至重度TBI入院患者在住院期间接受每次约15分钟的单独培训。主要结果是可行性,通过招募率、纳入率、依从性、依从性、减员率和安全性来衡量。次要结果是培训表现和用户评价。结果:招募率、依从性和依从性分别为72.9%、87.5%和93.8%。研究期间未发生干预相关不良事件。入选率为7.4%,流失率为42.9%。总体而言,六个预先确定的可行性标准中有四个得到满足,这表明在进行更大规模的研究之前需要对研究设计进行修改。结论:研究结果支持StepIt在TBI患者急性住院期间的可行性,尽管需要对研究设计进行修改。未来的研究应考察其在不同情况下的可行性,如住院或门诊康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
139
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management is an international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies in all therapeutic areas, outcomes, safety, and programs for the effective, safe, and sustained use of medicines, therapeutic and surgical interventions in all clinical areas. The journal welcomes submissions covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary. The journal will consider case reports but only if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. As of 18th March 2019, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书