{"title":"Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes for undifferentiated carcinoma with/without osteoclast-like giant cells of the pancreas.","authors":"Haoxiang Wu","doi":"10.1007/s13304-026-02799-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Undifferentiated carcinoma of the pancreas (UCP) are extremely rare entities and there is currently no standardized treatment guideline for it, with its characteristics and prognosis remaining unclear. UCP with osteoclast-like giant cells (OGCs) and without OGCs represent two different pathological types of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. This study aimed to improve our understanding of these entities with a focus on the comparison between these two entities. Patients diagnosed with undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells of the pancreas (UCOGCP) and UCP without OGCs (non-UCOGCP) were identified through the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected and compared. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models were applied to investigate the overall survival (OS) and prognostic factors. A total of 210 patients with UCP with/without osteoclast-like giant cells were included retrospectively in the study. There was no difference in the patient age, race distribution, primary site and tumor size between the two groups. However, the majority of UCOGCP patients were diagnosed between 2011-2021 and had a localized or regional disease when compared to patients with non-UCOGCP. Besides, more patients with UCOGCP received surgery (P < 0.001), chemotherapy (P = 0.003) and radiotherapy (P = 0.002). Patients with UCOGCP had a longer median OS compared to non-UCOGCP (11 months vs. 2 months, P < 0.001). Further multivariate analysis showed that patients with both tumors had a worse prognosis when they developed distant metastases. And surgical resection was independent prognostic factor of both UCOGCP (HR: 1.73, P = 0.033) and non-UCOGCP (HR: 2.55, P = 0.018). Chemotherapy was a prognostic factor of non-UCOGCP, but not of UCOGCP. Our study revealed that undifferentiated carcinoma with/without osteoclast-like giant cells of the pancreas are rare malignant tumors with different clinical characteristics and outcomes. UCOGCP patients had a better prognosis. Surgical resection was beneficial to the survival of both UCOGCP and non-UCOGCP patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-026-02799-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Undifferentiated carcinoma of the pancreas (UCP) are extremely rare entities and there is currently no standardized treatment guideline for it, with its characteristics and prognosis remaining unclear. UCP with osteoclast-like giant cells (OGCs) and without OGCs represent two different pathological types of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. This study aimed to improve our understanding of these entities with a focus on the comparison between these two entities. Patients diagnosed with undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells of the pancreas (UCOGCP) and UCP without OGCs (non-UCOGCP) were identified through the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected and compared. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models were applied to investigate the overall survival (OS) and prognostic factors. A total of 210 patients with UCP with/without osteoclast-like giant cells were included retrospectively in the study. There was no difference in the patient age, race distribution, primary site and tumor size between the two groups. However, the majority of UCOGCP patients were diagnosed between 2011-2021 and had a localized or regional disease when compared to patients with non-UCOGCP. Besides, more patients with UCOGCP received surgery (P < 0.001), chemotherapy (P = 0.003) and radiotherapy (P = 0.002). Patients with UCOGCP had a longer median OS compared to non-UCOGCP (11 months vs. 2 months, P < 0.001). Further multivariate analysis showed that patients with both tumors had a worse prognosis when they developed distant metastases. And surgical resection was independent prognostic factor of both UCOGCP (HR: 1.73, P = 0.033) and non-UCOGCP (HR: 2.55, P = 0.018). Chemotherapy was a prognostic factor of non-UCOGCP, but not of UCOGCP. Our study revealed that undifferentiated carcinoma with/without osteoclast-like giant cells of the pancreas are rare malignant tumors with different clinical characteristics and outcomes. UCOGCP patients had a better prognosis. Surgical resection was beneficial to the survival of both UCOGCP and non-UCOGCP patients.
胰腺未分化癌(Undifferentiated carcinoma of the pancreatic, UCP)是一种极为罕见的肿瘤,目前尚无规范的治疗指南,其特点及预后尚不清楚。UCP伴破骨细胞样巨细胞(OGCs)和无OGCs代表胰腺导管腺癌的两种不同病理类型。本研究旨在提高我们对这两个实体的理解,重点是对这两个实体的比较。通过监测流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库确定诊断为胰腺破骨细胞样巨细胞癌(UCOGCP)和无OGCs的UCP(非UCOGCP)的未分化癌患者。收集和比较人口学和临床特征。应用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox比例风险模型研究总生存期(OS)和预后因素。共有210例伴有/不伴有破骨细胞样巨细胞的UCP患者被回顾性纳入研究。两组患者的年龄、种族分布、原发部位和肿瘤大小均无差异。然而,与非UCOGCP患者相比,大多数UCOGCP患者在2011-2021年间被诊断为局部或区域性疾病。此外,更多的UCOGCP患者接受手术治疗(P
期刊介绍:
Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future.
Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts.
Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.