Decreasing 72-Hour Readmission Rates Among Patients with Sepsis.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Rowan Burns, Liela Meng, Mirinda Ann Gormley, Stella Self, Nathan Hudepohl
{"title":"Decreasing 72-Hour Readmission Rates Among Patients with Sepsis.","authors":"Rowan Burns, Liela Meng, Mirinda Ann Gormley, Stella Self, Nathan Hudepohl","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000002018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Sepsis survivors are susceptible to health complications, substantially increasing the risk of emergency department (ED) and hospital readmissions. Few evaluations, however, have assessed the effectiveness of interventions targeted at decreasing readmissions among patients with sepsis. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a targeted intervention to decrease 72-hour ED readmission rates in patients with sepsis or pyelonephritis in a large ED in the US South.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study investigated 72-hour readmission rates from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2023 for adults with an ED diagnosis of sepsis or pyelonephritis. An intervention to decrease ED readmissions was implemented on May 4, 2021. Monthly readmission rates were calculated as the proportion of patients readmitted within 72 hours of discharge following an ED visit with a discharge diagnosis of sepsis or pyelonephritis. Interrupted time series analysis was used to assess the differences in trends of monthly readmission rates prepolicy implementation, during policy implementation, and postpolicy implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 39,818 patients, 4907 (12.3%) had 72-hour readmissions. Preintervention, 72-hour readmissions increased by 0.00054 per admission per month (<i>P</i> = 0.30). At implementation, there was an immediate drop of 0.0017 in the monthly readmission rate (<i>P</i> = 0.75), and in postimplementation period, the trend reversed, with a sustained decrease of 0.00112 readmissions per admission per month (<i>P</i> = 0.04). There were sustained decreases in readmissions per admission per month of 0.00061 (<i>P</i> = 0.25) and 0.0033 (<i>P</i> = 0.02) for pyelonephritis and sepsis, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This intervention was associated with a sustained decrease in readmissions per month for septic individuals seen in the ED. The authors did not report any financial relationships or conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"119 10","pages":"648-652"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000002018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Sepsis survivors are susceptible to health complications, substantially increasing the risk of emergency department (ED) and hospital readmissions. Few evaluations, however, have assessed the effectiveness of interventions targeted at decreasing readmissions among patients with sepsis. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a targeted intervention to decrease 72-hour ED readmission rates in patients with sepsis or pyelonephritis in a large ED in the US South.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study investigated 72-hour readmission rates from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2023 for adults with an ED diagnosis of sepsis or pyelonephritis. An intervention to decrease ED readmissions was implemented on May 4, 2021. Monthly readmission rates were calculated as the proportion of patients readmitted within 72 hours of discharge following an ED visit with a discharge diagnosis of sepsis or pyelonephritis. Interrupted time series analysis was used to assess the differences in trends of monthly readmission rates prepolicy implementation, during policy implementation, and postpolicy implementation.

Results: Of 39,818 patients, 4907 (12.3%) had 72-hour readmissions. Preintervention, 72-hour readmissions increased by 0.00054 per admission per month (P = 0.30). At implementation, there was an immediate drop of 0.0017 in the monthly readmission rate (P = 0.75), and in postimplementation period, the trend reversed, with a sustained decrease of 0.00112 readmissions per admission per month (P = 0.04). There were sustained decreases in readmissions per admission per month of 0.00061 (P = 0.25) and 0.0033 (P = 0.02) for pyelonephritis and sepsis, respectively.

Conclusions: This intervention was associated with a sustained decrease in readmissions per month for septic individuals seen in the ED. The authors did not report any financial relationships or conflicts of interest.

降低脓毒症患者72小时再入院率。
目的:脓毒症幸存者易患健康并发症,大大增加了急诊室(ED)和医院再入院的风险。然而,很少有评估评估了针对减少败血症患者再入院的干预措施的有效性。本研究评估了在美国南部的一个大型ED中,针对降低脓毒症或肾盂肾炎患者72小时ED再入院率的针对性干预的有效性。方法:这项回顾性队列研究调查了从2020年1月1日到2023年12月31日,ED诊断为败血症或肾盂肾炎的成年人72小时再入院率。2021年5月4日实施了减少急诊再入院的干预措施。每月再入院率计算为出院诊断为败血症或肾盂肾炎的急诊科就诊后72小时内再入院的患者比例。使用中断时间序列分析来评估政策实施前、政策实施期间和政策实施后每月再入院率趋势的差异。结果:39,818例患者中,4907例(12.3%)有72小时再入院。干预前,72小时再入院率每月增加0.00054例(P = 0.30)。实施时每月再入院率立即下降0.0017例(P = 0.75),实施后趋势逆转,每月每入院再入院率持续下降0.00112例(P = 0.04)。肾盂肾炎和脓毒症的再入院率每月分别持续下降0.00061 (P = 0.25)和0.0033 (P = 0.02)。结论:这种干预与急诊室脓毒症患者每月再入院率持续下降有关。作者未报告任何经济关系或利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Southern Medical Journal
Southern Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
222
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书