A Predictive Model Integrating Coagulation Profiles for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Difficult Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study Based on Explainable Machine Learning.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Shijie Hu, Yan Xia, Jinxin Sheng, Song Zhu, Wei Bao, Lijuan Yang, Junwei Fan
{"title":"A Predictive Model Integrating Coagulation Profiles for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Difficult Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study Based on Explainable Machine Learning.","authors":"Shijie Hu, Yan Xia, Jinxin Sheng, Song Zhu, Wei Bao, Lijuan Yang, Junwei Fan","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate preoperative prediction of surgical difficulty in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) remains challenging, as models for multiport surgery are not directly applicable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study included 520 patients, who were randomly divided into a training cohort (n=364) and an internal validation cohort (n=156). Six predictors were identified, guiding 8 machine learning models. Performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), calibration, decision curve analysis, and classification metrics. The optimal model was interpreted through SHapley Additive exPlanations and deployed online.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimal neural network achieved excellent validation performance (AUC: 0.867, accuracy: 0.833, specificity: 0.941, NPV: 0.855), with good calibration (Brier 0.118) and net benefit across clinical thresholds. Ablation analysis showed AUC decreased by 0.043 when coagulation parameters were excluded; correlation analyses suggested they provide complementary predictive value. Exploratory sensitivity analysis using a hard-event endpoint maintained good discrimination (AUC: 0.877), supporting robustness of the composite outcome. The model is publicly available as an online calculator at https://newprediction.shinyapps.io/predict/.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We developed an interpretable machine learning model incorporating coagulation parameters to identify patients at increased risk of difficult SILC. The model demonstrated favorable predictive performance and may support preoperative risk stratification, patient selection, and individualized surgical planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001514","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurate preoperative prediction of surgical difficulty in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) remains challenging, as models for multiport surgery are not directly applicable.

Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 520 patients, who were randomly divided into a training cohort (n=364) and an internal validation cohort (n=156). Six predictors were identified, guiding 8 machine learning models. Performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), calibration, decision curve analysis, and classification metrics. The optimal model was interpreted through SHapley Additive exPlanations and deployed online.

Results: The optimal neural network achieved excellent validation performance (AUC: 0.867, accuracy: 0.833, specificity: 0.941, NPV: 0.855), with good calibration (Brier 0.118) and net benefit across clinical thresholds. Ablation analysis showed AUC decreased by 0.043 when coagulation parameters were excluded; correlation analyses suggested they provide complementary predictive value. Exploratory sensitivity analysis using a hard-event endpoint maintained good discrimination (AUC: 0.877), supporting robustness of the composite outcome. The model is publicly available as an online calculator at https://newprediction.shinyapps.io/predict/.

Conclusion: We developed an interpretable machine learning model incorporating coagulation parameters to identify patients at increased risk of difficult SILC. The model demonstrated favorable predictive performance and may support preoperative risk stratification, patient selection, and individualized surgical planning.

一项基于可解释机器学习的回顾性队列研究:综合单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术术前风险分层的凝血特征预测模型
背景:单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)术前准确预测手术难度仍然具有挑战性,因为多切口手术模型并不直接适用。方法:本回顾性单中心研究纳入520例患者,随机分为训练组(n=364)和内部验证组(n=156)。确定了6个预测因子,指导8个机器学习模型。使用曲线下面积(AUC)、校准、决策曲线分析和分类指标来评估性能。最优模型通过SHapley加性解释进行解释,并在线部署。结果:优化后的神经网络获得了良好的验证性能(AUC: 0.867,准确度:0.833,特异性:0.941,NPV: 0.855),具有良好的校准(Brier 0.118)和跨临床阈值的净效益。消融分析显示,排除凝血参数后AUC降低0.043;相关分析表明它们具有互补的预测价值。使用硬事件终点的探索性敏感性分析保持了良好的区分(AUC: 0.877),支持复合结果的稳健性。该模型可作为在线计算器在https://newprediction.shinyapps.io/predict/.Conclusion上公开获取:我们开发了一个可解释的机器学习模型,包括凝血参数,以识别困难SILC风险增加的患者。该模型显示出良好的预测性能,可以支持术前风险分层、患者选择和个体化手术计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques is a primary source for peer-reviewed, original articles on the newest techniques and applications in operative laparoscopy and endoscopy. Its Editorial Board includes many of the surgeons who pioneered the use of these revolutionary techniques. The journal provides complete, timely, accurate, practical coverage of laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques and procedures; current clinical and basic science research; preoperative and postoperative patient management; complications in laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery; and new developments in instrumentation and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书