Laparoscopy as the initial approach for hemodynamically stable abdominal stab wounds requiring exploration: a South African single-center experience.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Modise Zacharia Koto, Oleh Yevhenovych Matsevych, Lehlogonolo David Mashego, Tebogo Koto, Lerumo Evans Motla, Sifiso Flax Derrick Mthembu, Lorato Natasha Koto, Imraan Ismail Sardiwalla, Neha Kumar, Matlou Ernest Mabitsela
{"title":"Laparoscopy as the initial approach for hemodynamically stable abdominal stab wounds requiring exploration: a South African single-center experience.","authors":"Modise Zacharia Koto, Oleh Yevhenovych Matsevych, Lehlogonolo David Mashego, Tebogo Koto, Lerumo Evans Motla, Sifiso Flax Derrick Mthembu, Lorato Natasha Koto, Imraan Ismail Sardiwalla, Neha Kumar, Matlou Ernest Mabitsela","doi":"10.1007/s00464-026-13428-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of laparoscopy in penetrating abdominal trauma remains debated, and its adoption varies widely, largely due to concerns regarding missed injuries and the need for advanced laparoscopic expertise. We report our single-center experience using laparoscopy for hemodynamically stable patients with abdominal-region stab wounds with an indication for operative exploration (peritonitis, evisceration, or CT findings).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of data from a single-center trauma unit over a 23-month period. Patients with abdominal-region stab wounds meeting operative criteria and managed with laparoscopic exploration were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 170 patients with abdominal stab wounds, 10 (5.9%) were hemodynamically unstable and underwent immediate laparotomy. Of the remaining 160 stable patients, 19 (11.9%) were successfully managed non-operatively. Laparoscopic exploration was performed in 141 patients; 4/141 (2.8%) required conversion to laparotomy. The final laparoscopic cohort comprised 137 patients. The mean ISS was 10.1 (range 9-18). Diagnostic laparoscopy was performed in 14 patients (10.2%), and therapeutic laparoscopy in 123 (89.8%). Mean length of stay was one day (range 1-2) for diagnostic and 4.6 days (range 1-20) for therapeutic laparoscopy. There were no missed injuries. Complications (Clavien-Dindo III-V) occurred in 8.8% of patients, and 30-day mortality was 0.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopy is feasible for hemodynamically stable patients with abdominal-region stab wounds who require surgical exploration, with favorable outcomes in this series. Laparoscopy should be considered the initial operative approach in centers with appropriate expertise and resources. The range of therapeutic interventions and the threshold for conversion to laparotomy should be individualized based on the surgeon's experience, institutional capabilities, and equipment availability.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-026-13428-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The role of laparoscopy in penetrating abdominal trauma remains debated, and its adoption varies widely, largely due to concerns regarding missed injuries and the need for advanced laparoscopic expertise. We report our single-center experience using laparoscopy for hemodynamically stable patients with abdominal-region stab wounds with an indication for operative exploration (peritonitis, evisceration, or CT findings).

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from a single-center trauma unit over a 23-month period. Patients with abdominal-region stab wounds meeting operative criteria and managed with laparoscopic exploration were included.

Results: Of 170 patients with abdominal stab wounds, 10 (5.9%) were hemodynamically unstable and underwent immediate laparotomy. Of the remaining 160 stable patients, 19 (11.9%) were successfully managed non-operatively. Laparoscopic exploration was performed in 141 patients; 4/141 (2.8%) required conversion to laparotomy. The final laparoscopic cohort comprised 137 patients. The mean ISS was 10.1 (range 9-18). Diagnostic laparoscopy was performed in 14 patients (10.2%), and therapeutic laparoscopy in 123 (89.8%). Mean length of stay was one day (range 1-2) for diagnostic and 4.6 days (range 1-20) for therapeutic laparoscopy. There were no missed injuries. Complications (Clavien-Dindo III-V) occurred in 8.8% of patients, and 30-day mortality was 0.7%.

Conclusion: Laparoscopy is feasible for hemodynamically stable patients with abdominal-region stab wounds who require surgical exploration, with favorable outcomes in this series. Laparoscopy should be considered the initial operative approach in centers with appropriate expertise and resources. The range of therapeutic interventions and the threshold for conversion to laparotomy should be individualized based on the surgeon's experience, institutional capabilities, and equipment availability.

腹腔镜作为需要探查血流动力学稳定的腹部刺伤的初始方法:南非单中心经验。
背景:腹腔镜在穿透腹部创伤中的作用仍然存在争议,其采用范围很大,主要是由于对漏诊损伤的担忧和对高级腹腔镜专业知识的需求。我们报告了使用腹腔镜检查血液动力学稳定的腹部刺伤患者的单中心经验,该患者有手术探查的指征(腹膜炎、内脏切除或CT表现)。方法:我们对单中心创伤病房23个月的数据进行回顾性分析。患者腹部刀伤符合手术标准,并处理腹腔镜探查。结果:170例腹部刺伤患者中,有10例(5.9%)因血流动力学不稳定而立即开腹手术。其余160例病情稳定的患者中,19例(11.9%)非手术治疗成功。141例患者行腹腔镜探查;4/141(2.8%)需要转为剖腹手术。最后的腹腔镜队列包括137例患者。平均ISS为10.1(范围9-18)。诊断性腹腔镜14例(10.2%),治疗性腹腔镜123例(89.8%)。诊断性腹腔镜的平均住院时间为1天(1-2天),治疗性腹腔镜的平均住院时间为4.6天(1-20天)。没有人受伤。并发症(Clavien-Dindo III-V)发生率为8.8%,30天死亡率为0.7%。结论:对于血流动力学稳定且需要手术探查的腹部刺伤患者,腹腔镜手术是可行的,且本系列患者预后良好。在具有适当专业知识和资源的中心,腹腔镜应被视为初始手术入路。治疗干预的范围和转换为剖腹手术的门槛应根据外科医生的经验、机构能力和设备的可用性来个性化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书