Leveraging Machine Learning to Predict Quit Attempts Among Adult Cigarette Smokers.

IF 3.2 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2026-10-01 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/SAR.S639682
Zoë E Laky, Maria Barouti, Amanda Kaufmann, David A F Haaga
{"title":"Leveraging Machine Learning to Predict Quit Attempts Among Adult Cigarette Smokers.","authors":"Zoë E Laky, Maria Barouti, Amanda Kaufmann, David A F Haaga","doi":"10.2147/SAR.S639682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cigarette smoking is the leading preventable cause of premature death in the US. Quitting can significantly reduce the risk of adverse health effects. However, much is unknown about the factors prospectively associated with the behavioral step of making a quit attempt. The present study leveraged supervised machine learning, data from a prior experimental study, and exploratory methods to investigate longitudinal associations between smoking history, cognitive and behavioral indices, and quit attempts reported at a four-week follow-up assessment.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>Secondary analysis of a project that enrolled 278 adult cigarette smokers (18-69 years old) for a prospective study of predictors of making a quit attempt(s). Analyses were based on N = 231 with non-missing data through the one-month follow-up, separated into training (n = 185, of whom 36 made a quit attempt) and testing (n =46, of whom 9 made a quit attempt) subsets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the testing subset, a random forest model with class weights to address class imbalance and a linear support vector machine model performed best of the models tested, albeit not very well (eg, F<sub>1</sub> values of 0.36 in the testing set). Feature importance metrics suggested that contemplation status and perceived risks of \"I will eat more\" and \"I will miss the taste of cigarettes\" were of highest importance in classifications. All models had better specificity than sensitivity. Poor performance in the testing set may have resulted in part from small sample size.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While reliable predictions of quit attempts were not obtained across the train-test split, the present study leverages bottom-up, data-driven approaches, and machine learning methods to explore the understudied behavioral step of initiating a quit attempt. Future studies should continue exploring predictors of quit attempts, along with how they may differ from predictors of sustained smoking cessation. Data-driven machine learning methods have the potential to progress precision medicine efforts by clarifying generalizable mechanisms underlying clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22060,"journal":{"name":"Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation","volume":"17 ","pages":"639682"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13637735/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/SAR.S639682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cigarette smoking is the leading preventable cause of premature death in the US. Quitting can significantly reduce the risk of adverse health effects. However, much is unknown about the factors prospectively associated with the behavioral step of making a quit attempt. The present study leveraged supervised machine learning, data from a prior experimental study, and exploratory methods to investigate longitudinal associations between smoking history, cognitive and behavioral indices, and quit attempts reported at a four-week follow-up assessment.

Aims and methods: Secondary analysis of a project that enrolled 278 adult cigarette smokers (18-69 years old) for a prospective study of predictors of making a quit attempt(s). Analyses were based on N = 231 with non-missing data through the one-month follow-up, separated into training (n = 185, of whom 36 made a quit attempt) and testing (n =46, of whom 9 made a quit attempt) subsets.

Results: In the testing subset, a random forest model with class weights to address class imbalance and a linear support vector machine model performed best of the models tested, albeit not very well (eg, F1 values of 0.36 in the testing set). Feature importance metrics suggested that contemplation status and perceived risks of "I will eat more" and "I will miss the taste of cigarettes" were of highest importance in classifications. All models had better specificity than sensitivity. Poor performance in the testing set may have resulted in part from small sample size.

Conclusion: While reliable predictions of quit attempts were not obtained across the train-test split, the present study leverages bottom-up, data-driven approaches, and machine learning methods to explore the understudied behavioral step of initiating a quit attempt. Future studies should continue exploring predictors of quit attempts, along with how they may differ from predictors of sustained smoking cessation. Data-driven machine learning methods have the potential to progress precision medicine efforts by clarifying generalizable mechanisms underlying clinical outcomes.

利用机器学习预测成年吸烟者的戒烟尝试。
在美国,吸烟是导致过早死亡的主要可预防原因。戒烟可以显著降低不良健康影响的风险。然而,与尝试戒烟的行为步骤有关的因素还不清楚。本研究利用监督机器学习、先前实验研究的数据和探索性方法来调查吸烟史、认知和行为指标以及四周随访评估中报告的戒烟尝试之间的纵向关联。目的和方法:对一项纳入278名成年吸烟者(18-69岁)的项目进行二次分析,对戒烟尝试的预测因素进行前瞻性研究。通过一个月的随访,分析基于N = 231的非缺失数据,分为训练组(N = 185,其中36人戒烟)和测试组(N =46,其中9人戒烟)。结果:在测试子集中,具有类权来解决类不平衡的随机森林模型和线性支持向量机模型在测试模型中表现最好,尽管不是很好(例如,测试集中的F1值为0.36)。特征重要性指标表明,“我会吃更多”和“我会想念香烟的味道”的沉思状态和感知风险在分类中最重要。所有模型的特异性均优于敏感性。测试集的性能不佳可能部分原因是样本量小。结论:虽然没有通过训练测试分割获得戒烟尝试的可靠预测,但本研究利用自下而上、数据驱动的方法和机器学习方法来探索尚未被充分研究的启动戒烟尝试的行为步骤。未来的研究应该继续探索戒烟尝试的预测因素,以及它们与持续戒烟的预测因素有何不同。数据驱动的机器学习方法有可能通过阐明临床结果的可概括机制来推进精准医学的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书