Johan Ferrier Jørgensen, Frans Brandt, Michael Waldhauer Hunderup, Jan Dominik Kampmann
{"title":"The Intradialytic Changes in Cardiac Troponin I-A Systematic Review.","authors":"Johan Ferrier Jørgensen, Frans Brandt, Michael Waldhauer Hunderup, Jan Dominik Kampmann","doi":"10.1111/sdi.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in patients receiving hemodialysis. Current guidelines define acute myocardial infarction (AMI) by troponin levels above the 99th percentile, accompanied by a ≥ 20% rise or fall. However, troponin concentrations are often elevated, and hemodialysis may influence troponin levels during treatment. This systematic review aims to evaluate whether these factors compromise the diagnostic accuracy of troponin for AMI in patients undergoing hemodialysis. We performed a systematic review including 6359 studies. Inclusion criteria were adult patients and studies reporting predialysis and postdialysis assessment of troponin I. Twenty-eight studies were deemed suitable. Mean troponin I was assessed before and after dialysis. The risk of bias and applicability of the included studies were assessed. The studies were heterogeneous in terms of reporting intradialytic changes of troponin, either in mean or median, which was a problem, along with the lack of reporting dialysis details. The mean troponin predialysis was 68 ng/L, and the mean troponin postdialysis was 73 ng/L. The troponin changes during dialysis were between -100% and +933%. The per se elevated troponin I and the unpredictable changes during dialysis make the use of the current AMI guidelines challenging for patients on dialysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":21675,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Dialysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.70049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in patients receiving hemodialysis. Current guidelines define acute myocardial infarction (AMI) by troponin levels above the 99th percentile, accompanied by a ≥ 20% rise or fall. However, troponin concentrations are often elevated, and hemodialysis may influence troponin levels during treatment. This systematic review aims to evaluate whether these factors compromise the diagnostic accuracy of troponin for AMI in patients undergoing hemodialysis. We performed a systematic review including 6359 studies. Inclusion criteria were adult patients and studies reporting predialysis and postdialysis assessment of troponin I. Twenty-eight studies were deemed suitable. Mean troponin I was assessed before and after dialysis. The risk of bias and applicability of the included studies were assessed. The studies were heterogeneous in terms of reporting intradialytic changes of troponin, either in mean or median, which was a problem, along with the lack of reporting dialysis details. The mean troponin predialysis was 68 ng/L, and the mean troponin postdialysis was 73 ng/L. The troponin changes during dialysis were between -100% and +933%. The per se elevated troponin I and the unpredictable changes during dialysis make the use of the current AMI guidelines challenging for patients on dialysis.
期刊介绍:
Seminars in Dialysis is a bimonthly publication focusing exclusively on cutting-edge clinical aspects of dialysis therapy. Besides publishing papers by the most respected names in the field of dialysis, the Journal has unique useful features, all designed to keep you current:
-Fellows Forum
-Dialysis rounds
-Editorials
-Opinions
-Briefly noted
-Summary and Comment
-Guest Edited Issues
-Special Articles
Virtually everything you read in Seminars in Dialysis is written or solicited by the editors after choosing the most effective of nine different editorial styles and formats. They know that facts, speculations, ''how-to-do-it'' information, opinions, and news reports all play important roles in your education and the patient care you provide.
Alternate issues of the journal are guest edited and focus on a single clinical topic in dialysis.