Electrode-specific dosimetric robustness of group-level optimized transcranial alternating current and temporal interference stimulation montages under placement variability.
{"title":"Electrode-specific dosimetric robustness of group-level optimized transcranial alternating current and temporal interference stimulation montages under placement variability.","authors":"Eikei Yamada, Taiga Inoue, Naofumi Otsuru, Makoto Suzuki, Shintaro Uehara, Yohei Otaka, Akimasa Hirata","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/aeae9c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>The objective of this study was to characterize, for selected group-level optimized montages, electrode-specific dosimetric sensitivity to placement variability in transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS).<i>Approach.</i>Electric fields (EFs) were computed using the scalar-potential finite-difference method in 60 paired model instances generated from magnetic resonance imaging data of 30 male participants (30 original models and their left-right mirrored counterparts). Three anatomically defined targets spanning cortical and subcortical structures were examined: the primary somatosensory hand area (S1 Hand), the insula, and the hippocampus. Every electrode constituting each selected montage was independently displaced from -10 mm to +10 mm in 5 mm increments on a 5 × 5 tangential grid. Three descriptive outcomes were evaluated: intensity sensitivity, defined as the absolute percentage change in the region-of-interest mean; hotspot displacement; and position-dependent intensity variability, defined as the standard deviation (SD) of the percentage change across the full ±10 mm grid.<i>Main results.</i>Across all 16 displaced electrodes, intensity sensitivity ranged from 0.41%-14.88%, and hotspot displacement ranged from 0.63-6.86 mm. Marked within-pair asymmetries were observed in several montages, and position-dependent intensity variability differed across electrodes and model instances. These patterns were descriptively associated with montage geometry and current allocation.<i>Significance</i>. The independent all-electrode perturbation framework introduced here enables electrode-specific robustness assessment of group-level optimized tACS and tTIS montages. The results identify montage-specific electrodes for which placement control is particularly important within the studied configurations, informing the practical implementation of these montages.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aeae9c","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective.The objective of this study was to characterize, for selected group-level optimized montages, electrode-specific dosimetric sensitivity to placement variability in transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS).Approach.Electric fields (EFs) were computed using the scalar-potential finite-difference method in 60 paired model instances generated from magnetic resonance imaging data of 30 male participants (30 original models and their left-right mirrored counterparts). Three anatomically defined targets spanning cortical and subcortical structures were examined: the primary somatosensory hand area (S1 Hand), the insula, and the hippocampus. Every electrode constituting each selected montage was independently displaced from -10 mm to +10 mm in 5 mm increments on a 5 × 5 tangential grid. Three descriptive outcomes were evaluated: intensity sensitivity, defined as the absolute percentage change in the region-of-interest mean; hotspot displacement; and position-dependent intensity variability, defined as the standard deviation (SD) of the percentage change across the full ±10 mm grid.Main results.Across all 16 displaced electrodes, intensity sensitivity ranged from 0.41%-14.88%, and hotspot displacement ranged from 0.63-6.86 mm. Marked within-pair asymmetries were observed in several montages, and position-dependent intensity variability differed across electrodes and model instances. These patterns were descriptively associated with montage geometry and current allocation.Significance. The independent all-electrode perturbation framework introduced here enables electrode-specific robustness assessment of group-level optimized tACS and tTIS montages. The results identify montage-specific electrodes for which placement control is particularly important within the studied configurations, informing the practical implementation of these montages.
期刊介绍:
The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry