Electrode-specific dosimetric robustness of group-level optimized transcranial alternating current and temporal interference stimulation montages under placement variability.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Eikei Yamada, Taiga Inoue, Naofumi Otsuru, Makoto Suzuki, Shintaro Uehara, Yohei Otaka, Akimasa Hirata
{"title":"Electrode-specific dosimetric robustness of group-level optimized transcranial alternating current and temporal interference stimulation montages under placement variability.","authors":"Eikei Yamada, Taiga Inoue, Naofumi Otsuru, Makoto Suzuki, Shintaro Uehara, Yohei Otaka, Akimasa Hirata","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/aeae9c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>The objective of this study was to characterize, for selected group-level optimized montages, electrode-specific dosimetric sensitivity to placement variability in transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS).<i>Approach.</i>Electric fields (EFs) were computed using the scalar-potential finite-difference method in 60 paired model instances generated from magnetic resonance imaging data of 30 male participants (30 original models and their left-right mirrored counterparts). Three anatomically defined targets spanning cortical and subcortical structures were examined: the primary somatosensory hand area (S1 Hand), the insula, and the hippocampus. Every electrode constituting each selected montage was independently displaced from -10 mm to +10 mm in 5 mm increments on a 5 × 5 tangential grid. Three descriptive outcomes were evaluated: intensity sensitivity, defined as the absolute percentage change in the region-of-interest mean; hotspot displacement; and position-dependent intensity variability, defined as the standard deviation (SD) of the percentage change across the full ±10 mm grid.<i>Main results.</i>Across all 16 displaced electrodes, intensity sensitivity ranged from 0.41%-14.88%, and hotspot displacement ranged from 0.63-6.86 mm. Marked within-pair asymmetries were observed in several montages, and position-dependent intensity variability differed across electrodes and model instances. These patterns were descriptively associated with montage geometry and current allocation.<i>Significance</i>. The independent all-electrode perturbation framework introduced here enables electrode-specific robustness assessment of group-level optimized tACS and tTIS montages. The results identify montage-specific electrodes for which placement control is particularly important within the studied configurations, informing the practical implementation of these montages.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aeae9c","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective.The objective of this study was to characterize, for selected group-level optimized montages, electrode-specific dosimetric sensitivity to placement variability in transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS).Approach.Electric fields (EFs) were computed using the scalar-potential finite-difference method in 60 paired model instances generated from magnetic resonance imaging data of 30 male participants (30 original models and their left-right mirrored counterparts). Three anatomically defined targets spanning cortical and subcortical structures were examined: the primary somatosensory hand area (S1 Hand), the insula, and the hippocampus. Every electrode constituting each selected montage was independently displaced from -10 mm to +10 mm in 5 mm increments on a 5 × 5 tangential grid. Three descriptive outcomes were evaluated: intensity sensitivity, defined as the absolute percentage change in the region-of-interest mean; hotspot displacement; and position-dependent intensity variability, defined as the standard deviation (SD) of the percentage change across the full ±10 mm grid.Main results.Across all 16 displaced electrodes, intensity sensitivity ranged from 0.41%-14.88%, and hotspot displacement ranged from 0.63-6.86 mm. Marked within-pair asymmetries were observed in several montages, and position-dependent intensity variability differed across electrodes and model instances. These patterns were descriptively associated with montage geometry and current allocation.Significance. The independent all-electrode perturbation framework introduced here enables electrode-specific robustness assessment of group-level optimized tACS and tTIS montages. The results identify montage-specific electrodes for which placement control is particularly important within the studied configurations, informing the practical implementation of these montages.

组水平优化经颅交流电流和颞叶干扰刺激蒙太奇在放置可变性下的电极特异性剂量学稳健性。
目的:本研究的目的是表征经颅交流电刺激(tACS)和经颅颞叶干扰刺激(tTIS)中电极特异性剂量学对放置变异性的敏感性。使用标势有限差分(SPFD)方法计算了30名男性参与者(30个原始模型和他们的左右镜像模型)的60个配对模型实例的电场(EFs)。三个解剖学定义的目标跨越皮层和皮层下结构进行了检查:初级体感手区(S1 hand),岛和海马体。构成每个选定蒙太奇的每个电极在5 × 5切向网格上以5毫米的增量独立地从-10毫米位移到+10毫米。评估了三个描述性结果:强度敏感性,定义为感兴趣区域(ROI)平均值的绝对百分比变化;热点位移;和位置相关的强度可变性,定义为±10 mm栅格中百分比变化的标准差(SD)。主要结果:在所有16个位移电极中,强度灵敏度范围为0.41%至14.88%,热点位移范围为0.63 mm至6.86 mm。在几个蒙太奇中观察到明显的对内不对称,并且位置依赖的强度可变性在电极和模型实例之间有所不同。这些模式与蒙太奇几何形状和电流分配具有描述性关联。意义:本文引入的独立全电极扰动框架可以对组级优化的tACS和tTIS蒙太奇进行电极特异性稳健性评估。结果确定了特定于蒙太奇的电极,其放置控制在所研究的配置中特别重要,为这些蒙太奇的实际实施提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书