Comparison of Methylprednisolone and Dexamethasone in Their Interaction With Sugammadex in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Mustafa Büyükcavlak, Yasin Tire, Mehmet Sarı, Cansu Çiftci
{"title":"Comparison of Methylprednisolone and Dexamethasone in Their Interaction With Sugammadex in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Mustafa Büyükcavlak, Yasin Tire, Mehmet Sarı, Cansu Çiftci","doi":"10.1002/pan.70322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sugammadex may interact with steroidal compounds; however, comparative clinical data on different peri-operative corticosteroids in children are limited. This randomized controlled trial primarily aimed to compare the effect of methylprednisolone and dexamethasone, administered at clinically equivalent glucocorticoid doses, on sugammadex-mediated reversal time of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block in children. Secondary aims were to compare extubation time, postoperative nausea, pain, and adverse events related to upper airway oedema between groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty children undergoing adenotonsillar surgery were randomized 1:1:1 to receive methylprednisolone 1 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>, dexamethasone 0.2 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>, or no corticosteroid (control). Neuromuscular monitoring followed the Good Clinical Research Practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents standards. The primary endpoint was the rocuronium reversal time: interval from the sugammadex bolus at train of four count = 2 to a normalized train of four ratio of 0.9. Extubation time (interval from the sugammadex bolus at a train of four count = 2 until tracheal extubation); severity scores for postoperative pain and nausea; and frequency of adverse events related to upper airway oedema were the secondary endpoints. Between-group comparisons used one-way ANOVA or Welch's ANOVA for normally distributed data and the Kruskal-Wallis test for non-normally distributed data, with Bonferroni-corrected post hoc pairwise comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population had a mean ± SD age, weight, and height of 7.9 ± 2.0 years, 30.0 ± 9.3 kg, and 129.0 ± 11.0 cm, respectively, with comparable demographic and baseline profiles across groups. Reversal time was longer with methylprednisolone (mean ± SD: 82.8 ± 16.1 s) than with dexamethasone (63.4 ± 13.4 s) and control (56.1 ± 13.7 s) (p < 0.001). Extubation time showed a similar pattern. Postoperative nausea-vomiting, pain scores, and the overall incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At clinically equivalent glucocorticoid doses, methylprednisolone was associated with longer sugammadex-mediated reversal and extubation time than dexamethasone and control, while postoperative pain, nausea scores, and adverse event rates were comparable between the groups. These findings indicate that the corticosteroid selected for peri-operative use may influence the efficacy of sugammadex-mediated reversal in children.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT07175623.</p>","PeriodicalId":19745,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pan.70322","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sugammadex may interact with steroidal compounds; however, comparative clinical data on different peri-operative corticosteroids in children are limited. This randomized controlled trial primarily aimed to compare the effect of methylprednisolone and dexamethasone, administered at clinically equivalent glucocorticoid doses, on sugammadex-mediated reversal time of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block in children. Secondary aims were to compare extubation time, postoperative nausea, pain, and adverse events related to upper airway oedema between groups.

Methods: Sixty children undergoing adenotonsillar surgery were randomized 1:1:1 to receive methylprednisolone 1 mg kg-1, dexamethasone 0.2 mg kg-1, or no corticosteroid (control). Neuromuscular monitoring followed the Good Clinical Research Practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents standards. The primary endpoint was the rocuronium reversal time: interval from the sugammadex bolus at train of four count = 2 to a normalized train of four ratio of 0.9. Extubation time (interval from the sugammadex bolus at a train of four count = 2 until tracheal extubation); severity scores for postoperative pain and nausea; and frequency of adverse events related to upper airway oedema were the secondary endpoints. Between-group comparisons used one-way ANOVA or Welch's ANOVA for normally distributed data and the Kruskal-Wallis test for non-normally distributed data, with Bonferroni-corrected post hoc pairwise comparisons.

Results: The study population had a mean ± SD age, weight, and height of 7.9 ± 2.0 years, 30.0 ± 9.3 kg, and 129.0 ± 11.0 cm, respectively, with comparable demographic and baseline profiles across groups. Reversal time was longer with methylprednisolone (mean ± SD: 82.8 ± 16.1 s) than with dexamethasone (63.4 ± 13.4 s) and control (56.1 ± 13.7 s) (p < 0.001). Extubation time showed a similar pattern. Postoperative nausea-vomiting, pain scores, and the overall incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusions: At clinically equivalent glucocorticoid doses, methylprednisolone was associated with longer sugammadex-mediated reversal and extubation time than dexamethasone and control, while postoperative pain, nausea scores, and adverse event rates were comparable between the groups. These findings indicate that the corticosteroid selected for peri-operative use may influence the efficacy of sugammadex-mediated reversal in children.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT07175623.

甲基强的松龙和地塞米松在儿科患者中与Sugammadex相互作用的比较:一项随机对照试验。
背景:Sugammadex可能与甾体化合物相互作用;然而,不同围手术期皮质类固醇在儿童中的比较临床数据有限。这项随机对照试验的主要目的是比较甲基强的松龙和地塞米松在临床上同等糖皮质激素剂量下对儿童罗库溴铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞的糖介导逆转时间的影响。次要目的是比较两组间拔管时间、术后恶心、疼痛和与上气道水肿相关的不良事件。方法:60例接受腺扁桃体手术的儿童按1:1:1的比例随机分为甲泼尼龙1 mg kg-1、地塞米松0.2 mg kg-1和不使用皮质类固醇(对照组)。神经肌肉监测遵循良好临床研究规范中神经肌肉阻滞剂药效学研究的标准。主要终点是罗库溴铵逆转时间:从四次训练的糖胺酮丸计数= 2到四次训练的归一化比率为0.9。拔管时间(从连续4次给药至气管拔管的间隔,计数= 2);术后疼痛和恶心的严重程度评分;与上气道水肿相关的不良事件频率是次要终点。组间比较对正态分布数据使用单因素方差分析或韦尔奇方差分析,对非正态分布数据使用Kruskal-Wallis检验,并使用bonferroni校正的事后两两比较。结果:研究人群的平均±SD年龄、体重和身高分别为7.9±2.0岁、30.0±9.3 kg和129.0±11.0 cm,各组人口统计学和基线资料具有可比性。甲基强的松龙组逆转时间(平均±SD: 82.8±16.1 s)比地塞米松组(63.4±13.4 s)和对照组(56.1±13.7 s)更长(p)。结论:在临床同等糖皮质激素剂量下,甲基强的松龙与地塞米松和对照组相比,糖介导的逆转和拔管时间更长,而两组之间的术后疼痛、恶心评分和不良事件发生率相当。这些发现表明围手术期使用的皮质类固醇可能会影响糖介导的儿童逆转的疗效。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT07175623。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Anesthesia
Pediatric Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Devoted to the dissemination of research of interest and importance to practising anesthetists everywhere, the scientific and clinical content of Pediatric Anesthesia covers a wide selection of medical disciplines in all areas relevant to paediatric anaesthesia, pain management and peri-operative medicine. The International Editorial Board is supported by the Editorial Advisory Board and a team of Senior Advisors, to ensure that the journal is publishing the best work from the front line of research in the field. The journal publishes high-quality, relevant scientific and clinical research papers, reviews, commentaries, pro-con debates, historical vignettes, correspondence, case presentations and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书