Development of a Simple MRI Scoring Tool in Severe Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: Secondary Analysis of the 2014-2017 "Approaches and Decisions in Acute Pediatric TBI Trial (ADAPT)" Multicenter Study.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Anna M Janas, Furkan Camci, Aimee T Broman, Susan Rebsamen, Aaron S Field, Kerri L LaRovere, Bedda L Rosario, Michael J Bell, Andrew L Alexander, Peter A Ferrazzano
{"title":"Development of a Simple MRI Scoring Tool in Severe Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: Secondary Analysis of the 2014-2017 \"Approaches and Decisions in Acute Pediatric TBI Trial (ADAPT)\" Multicenter Study.","authors":"Anna M Janas, Furkan Camci, Aimee T Broman, Susan Rebsamen, Aaron S Field, Kerri L LaRovere, Bedda L Rosario, Michael J Bell, Andrew L Alexander, Peter A Ferrazzano","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000004033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to describe the frequency, depth, and co-occurrence of different intracerebral injury types detected on the first clinical brain MRI in children with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to derive a simple MRI scoring system associated with 12-month functional outcome.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of the Approaches and Decision in Acute Pediatric TBI (ADAPT) multicenter 2014 to 2017 study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A total of 24 ADAPT sites in the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Children (< 18 yr) with severe TBI who received intracranial pressure monitoring and clinical brain MRI within 30 days of injury.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>MRI was evaluated for lesion type and location, and maximal depth of any lesion was determined for each subject (grade 1, lobar gray and white matter; grade 2, deep gray matter and corpus callosum; grade 3, brainstem). The primary outcome was Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended Pediatric version (GOSE-P) at 12 months, dichotomized to favorable (GOSE-P 1-3) vs. unfavorable (GOSE-P 4-8). In the cohort of 279 patients, we found that the three most frequent lesion types were contusion (78.5%), diffuse axonal injury (70.3%), and ischemia (38.0%). When evaluating maximal injury grade, grade 1 was present in 48 children (17.2%), grade 2 in 103 children (36.9%), and grade 3 in 113 children (40.5%). Injury grade and presence of ischemia were associated with increased odds of unfavorable outcome. Injury depth and ischemia on MRI (IDIOM) were incorporated into a novel six-category MRI Injury Scale, with scores ranging from 1 to 3+ (injury grades 1-3, + indicates presence of any ischemia). We found that score 3+, that is, brainstem injury with ischemia in any location, increased the risk of unfavorable outcome 22.3-fold (95% CI, 6.81-87.37; p < 0.0001) compared with score 1 (injury isolated to lobar gray and white matter, without ischemia).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increased depth of injury and presence of ischemia on MRI are important risk factors for unfavorable outcome in children with severe TBI. We propose a simple MRI scoring system (IDIOM) that incorporates depth of injury and presence of ischemia that may be useful for neuroprognostication, but further validation is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000004033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to describe the frequency, depth, and co-occurrence of different intracerebral injury types detected on the first clinical brain MRI in children with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to derive a simple MRI scoring system associated with 12-month functional outcome.

Design: Secondary analysis of the Approaches and Decision in Acute Pediatric TBI (ADAPT) multicenter 2014 to 2017 study.

Setting: A total of 24 ADAPT sites in the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia.

Patients: Children (< 18 yr) with severe TBI who received intracranial pressure monitoring and clinical brain MRI within 30 days of injury.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: MRI was evaluated for lesion type and location, and maximal depth of any lesion was determined for each subject (grade 1, lobar gray and white matter; grade 2, deep gray matter and corpus callosum; grade 3, brainstem). The primary outcome was Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended Pediatric version (GOSE-P) at 12 months, dichotomized to favorable (GOSE-P 1-3) vs. unfavorable (GOSE-P 4-8). In the cohort of 279 patients, we found that the three most frequent lesion types were contusion (78.5%), diffuse axonal injury (70.3%), and ischemia (38.0%). When evaluating maximal injury grade, grade 1 was present in 48 children (17.2%), grade 2 in 103 children (36.9%), and grade 3 in 113 children (40.5%). Injury grade and presence of ischemia were associated with increased odds of unfavorable outcome. Injury depth and ischemia on MRI (IDIOM) were incorporated into a novel six-category MRI Injury Scale, with scores ranging from 1 to 3+ (injury grades 1-3, + indicates presence of any ischemia). We found that score 3+, that is, brainstem injury with ischemia in any location, increased the risk of unfavorable outcome 22.3-fold (95% CI, 6.81-87.37; p < 0.0001) compared with score 1 (injury isolated to lobar gray and white matter, without ischemia).

Conclusions: Increased depth of injury and presence of ischemia on MRI are important risk factors for unfavorable outcome in children with severe TBI. We propose a simple MRI scoring system (IDIOM) that incorporates depth of injury and presence of ischemia that may be useful for neuroprognostication, but further validation is required.

一种简易的儿童创伤性脑损伤MRI评分工具的开发:2014-2017年“急性儿童TBI试验(ADAPT)的方法和决策”多中心研究的二次分析
目的:我们旨在描述严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)儿童首次临床脑MRI检测到的不同脑内损伤类型的频率、深度和共发生情况,并建立一个与12个月功能预后相关的简单MRI评分系统。设计:对2014年至2017年急性儿科TBI (ADAPT)多中心研究的方法和决策进行二次分析。环境:在美国、英国和澳大利亚共有24个ADAPT站点。患者:严重TBI患儿(< 18岁),损伤后30天内接受颅内压监测和临床脑MRI。干预措施:没有。测量和主要结果:MRI评估病变类型和位置,并确定每个受试者任何病变的最大深度(1级,大叶灰质和白质;2级,深灰质和胼胝体;3级,脑干)。主要结局是12个月时的格拉斯哥结局量表扩展儿科版本(go - p),分为有利(go - p 1-3)和不利(go - p 4-8)。在279例患者中,我们发现三种最常见的病变类型是挫伤(78.5%)、弥漫性轴索损伤(70.3%)和缺血(38.0%)。在评估最大损伤等级时,48名儿童为1级(17.2%),103名儿童为2级(36.9%),113名儿童为3级(40.5%)。损伤等级和缺血的存在与不良结果的几率增加相关。MRI上的损伤深度和缺血(IDIOM)被纳入一个新的六类MRI损伤量表,评分范围从1到3+(损伤等级1-3,+表示存在任何缺血)。我们发现,评分3+,即脑干损伤在任何部位缺血,与评分1(仅损伤脑叶灰质和白质,无缺血)相比,不良结局的风险增加22.3倍(95% CI, 6.81-87.37; p < 0.0001)。结论:损伤深度增加和MRI上出现缺血是严重TBI患儿预后不良的重要危险因素。我们提出了一个简单的MRI评分系统(IDIOM),该系统包含损伤深度和缺血的存在,可能对神经预后有用,但需要进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
991
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书