Association between age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index and risk of nonhome discharge in sepsis survivors: A retrospective analysis based on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database.

IF 1.6 4区 医学
Jiafang Zhang, Qianying Mo, Jiahui Liu, Yiheng Zhang, Zeyu Cai, Xiangyang Duan, Tianrui Jin, Yinuo Zhu, Jun Lyu, Xiaoshen Zhang
{"title":"Association between age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index and risk of nonhome discharge in sepsis survivors: A retrospective analysis based on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database.","authors":"Jiafang Zhang, Qianying Mo, Jiahui Liu, Yiheng Zhang, Zeyu Cai, Xiangyang Duan, Tianrui Jin, Yinuo Zhu, Jun Lyu, Xiaoshen Zhang","doi":"10.1097/JXX.0000000000001374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis is a common complication in intensive care units, and the discharge disposition of survivors has clinical significance. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) predicts long-term outcomes based on comorbidity burden.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the association between age-adjusted CCI (ACCI) and nonhome discharge among sepsis survivors.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database. Adult sepsis survivors (Sepsis-3.0 criteria) were included. Patients who died during hospitalization or had missing data were excluded. The primary outcome was nonhome discharge (i.e., discharge to skilled nursing facilities, long-term care, or rehabilitation). Multivariable logistic regression, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 23,683 sepsis survivors, 44.9% were discharged home, and 55.1% had nonhome discharge. In the nonhome discharge group, 65% had a CCI score ≥5, compared with 40.4% in the home discharge group. Multivariable logistic regression showed that each 1-point increase in ACCI was associated with higher odds of nonhome discharge (odds ratio = 1.15, 95% confidence interval: 1.14-1.16, p < .001). This association remained robust across sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An ACCI means people with sepsis are more likely to be discharged to a location other than home.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The ACCI can help nurses figure out which patients with sepsis are at risk. This can help plan for their care after they leave the hospital, and it can also help make sure that the right resources are used for the patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000001374","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is a common complication in intensive care units, and the discharge disposition of survivors has clinical significance. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) predicts long-term outcomes based on comorbidity burden.

Purpose: To investigate the association between age-adjusted CCI (ACCI) and nonhome discharge among sepsis survivors.

Methodology: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database. Adult sepsis survivors (Sepsis-3.0 criteria) were included. Patients who died during hospitalization or had missing data were excluded. The primary outcome was nonhome discharge (i.e., discharge to skilled nursing facilities, long-term care, or rehabilitation). Multivariable logistic regression, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results: Among 23,683 sepsis survivors, 44.9% were discharged home, and 55.1% had nonhome discharge. In the nonhome discharge group, 65% had a CCI score ≥5, compared with 40.4% in the home discharge group. Multivariable logistic regression showed that each 1-point increase in ACCI was associated with higher odds of nonhome discharge (odds ratio = 1.15, 95% confidence interval: 1.14-1.16, p < .001). This association remained robust across sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions: An ACCI means people with sepsis are more likely to be discharged to a location other than home.

Implications: The ACCI can help nurses figure out which patients with sepsis are at risk. This can help plan for their care after they leave the hospital, and it can also help make sure that the right resources are used for the patients.

年龄调整的Charlson共病指数与脓毒症幸存者非居家出院风险之间的关系:基于重症监护医学信息市场IV数据库的回顾性分析
背景:脓毒症是重症监护病房常见的并发症,幸存者的出院处理具有重要的临床意义。Charlson共病指数(CCI)预测基于共病负担的长期结果。目的:探讨脓毒症幸存者年龄调整CCI (ACCI)与非家庭出院的关系。方法:使用重症监护医学信息市场IV数据库进行回顾性队列研究。纳入成人脓毒症幸存者(脓毒症-3.0标准)。排除住院期间死亡或资料缺失的患者。主要结局是非家庭出院(即,出院到专业护理机构,长期护理或康复)。进行多变量logistic回归、亚组分析和敏感性分析。结果:23683例脓毒症幸存者中,44.9%出院回家,55.1%非出院回家。在非家庭出院组中,65%的患者CCI评分≥5,而家庭出院组为40.4%。多变量logistic回归显示,ACCI每增加1点,非家出院的几率就会增加(优势比= 1.15,95%可信区间:1.14-1.16,p < 0.001)。在敏感性分析中,这种关联仍然很强。结论:ACCI意味着脓毒症患者更有可能出院到家中以外的地方。意义:ACCI可以帮助护士确定哪些脓毒症患者处于危险之中。这可以帮助他们计划出院后的护理,也可以帮助确保为患者使用正确的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
16.70%
发文量
172
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (JAANP) is a monthly peer-reviewed professional journal that serves as the official publication of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. Published since 1989, the JAANP provides a strong clinical focus with articles related to primary, secondary, and tertiary care, nurse practitioner education, health policy, ethics and ethical issues, and health care delivery. The journal publishes original research, integrative/comprehensive reviews, case studies, a variety of topics in clinical practice, and theory-based articles related to patient and professional education. Although the majority of nurse practitioners function in primary care, there is an increasing focus on the provision of care across all types of systems from acute to long-term care settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书