Predictive modeling of lung cancer subtype with integration of clinical and thoracic imaging features to guide early brain metastasis management.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jino Park, Paul Buclez, Jessica Lubisich, Krishna Hanubal, Andrea Inda, Caressa Hui, Jeremy Harris, Aaron Simon
{"title":"Predictive modeling of lung cancer subtype with integration of clinical and thoracic imaging features to guide early brain metastasis management.","authors":"Jino Park, Paul Buclez, Jessica Lubisich, Krishna Hanubal, Andrea Inda, Caressa Hui, Jeremy Harris, Aaron Simon","doi":"10.1007/s11060-026-05812-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Optimal treatment for synchronous brain metastases at lung cancer diagnosis depends on subtype, but histologic/molecular profiling is often delayed. We developed machine-learning models using clinical and imaging data to classify lung cancer into three subtypes with distinct brain metastasis treatment implications: small cell lung cancer (SCLC), EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (EGFR+), and EGFR-wild-type non-small cell lung cancer (EGFR-).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified patients with metastatic lung cancer diagnosed from 2016 to 2025 at a single institution. Patients without brain metastases at diagnosis formed the training cohort, while patients presenting with synchronous brain metastases formed the testing cohort. Clinical variables and thoracic imaging features from diagnostic chest CT reports were used to train LASSO logistic regression and random forest models, evaluated via AUC and standard diagnostic metrics. Feature contributions were assessed using logistic regression coefficients and random forest permutation importance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 305 patients, 182 were used for training and 123 comprised the testing cohort. Logistic regression achieved AUCs of 0.887, 0.811, and 0.801 for EGFR+, SCLC, and EGFR-, respectively; random forest achieved 0.907, 0.783, and 0.810. Adding imaging features to clinical variables improved prediction for EGFR + and SCLC. Contributory imaging features included fibrosis, emphysema, miliary pattern, cavitation, pleural attachment, and vessel encasement, among others. Three-way prediction showed highest positive predictive value for EGFR + and high negative predictive value for SCLC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combined clinical and chest imaging features can help predict lung cancer subtype, supporting early multidisciplinary discussions for patients with synchronous brain metastases.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":"180 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13638719/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-026-05812-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Optimal treatment for synchronous brain metastases at lung cancer diagnosis depends on subtype, but histologic/molecular profiling is often delayed. We developed machine-learning models using clinical and imaging data to classify lung cancer into three subtypes with distinct brain metastasis treatment implications: small cell lung cancer (SCLC), EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (EGFR+), and EGFR-wild-type non-small cell lung cancer (EGFR-).

Methods: We retrospectively identified patients with metastatic lung cancer diagnosed from 2016 to 2025 at a single institution. Patients without brain metastases at diagnosis formed the training cohort, while patients presenting with synchronous brain metastases formed the testing cohort. Clinical variables and thoracic imaging features from diagnostic chest CT reports were used to train LASSO logistic regression and random forest models, evaluated via AUC and standard diagnostic metrics. Feature contributions were assessed using logistic regression coefficients and random forest permutation importance.

Results: Of 305 patients, 182 were used for training and 123 comprised the testing cohort. Logistic regression achieved AUCs of 0.887, 0.811, and 0.801 for EGFR+, SCLC, and EGFR-, respectively; random forest achieved 0.907, 0.783, and 0.810. Adding imaging features to clinical variables improved prediction for EGFR + and SCLC. Contributory imaging features included fibrosis, emphysema, miliary pattern, cavitation, pleural attachment, and vessel encasement, among others. Three-way prediction showed highest positive predictive value for EGFR + and high negative predictive value for SCLC.

Conclusion: Combined clinical and chest imaging features can help predict lung cancer subtype, supporting early multidisciplinary discussions for patients with synchronous brain metastases.

结合临床和胸部影像学特征的肺癌亚型预测建模指导早期脑转移治疗。
目的:肺癌同步脑转移诊断的最佳治疗取决于亚型,但组织学/分子分析往往延迟。我们利用临床和影像学数据开发了机器学习模型,将肺癌分为三种具有不同脑转移治疗意义的亚型:小细胞肺癌(SCLC)、EGFR突变的非小细胞肺癌(EGFR+)和EGFR野生型非小细胞肺癌(EGFR-)。方法:我们回顾性分析了2016年至2025年在单一机构诊断的转移性肺癌患者。诊断时无脑转移的患者为训练组,同时出现脑转移的患者为检测组。临床变量和诊断性胸部CT报告的胸部影像特征用于训练LASSO逻辑回归和随机森林模型,通过AUC和标准诊断指标进行评估。使用逻辑回归系数和随机森林排列重要性评估特征贡献。结果:在305例患者中,182例用于培训,123例组成测试队列。Logistic回归结果显示,EGFR+、SCLC和EGFR-的auc分别为0.887、0.811和0.801;随机森林实现了0.907、0.783和0.810。在临床变量中加入影像学特征可以改善对EGFR +和SCLC的预测。辅助影像特征包括纤维化、肺气肿、军事型、空化、胸膜附着、血管包裹等。三种预测方法中EGFR +阳性预测值最高,SCLC阴性预测值最高。结论:结合临床和胸部影像学特征可以帮助预测肺癌亚型,支持同步脑转移患者的早期多学科讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Journal of Neuro-Oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
277
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书