Robert van Vorstenbosch, Ekaterina E Esenkova, Daisy M A E Jonkers, Montserrat Elizalde Vilalta, Marlijne de Graaf, Daniel Keszthelyi, Daniëlle Pachen, Frederik-Jan van Schooten, Zlatan Mujagic, Agnieszka Smolinska
{"title":"Investigating the presence of microbiota-based phenotypes in irritable bowel syndrome.","authors":"Robert van Vorstenbosch, Ekaterina E Esenkova, Daisy M A E Jonkers, Montserrat Elizalde Vilalta, Marlijne de Graaf, Daniel Keszthelyi, Daniëlle Pachen, Frederik-Jan van Schooten, Zlatan Mujagic, Agnieszka Smolinska","doi":"10.1088/1752-7163/aeb043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is heterogenous disorder of gut-brain interaction, with a key role for the dysregulated host-gut microbiota interplay. IBS subtyping is based only on symptoms of bowel habits, reflecting limited insight into underlying biological mechanisms. This study aimed to define microbiota-based IBS phenotypes and to compare these to traditional stool-based subtyping. The study utilized data from the Maastricht IBS cohort. Gut microbiota composition was analysed using shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Faecal volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were measured by gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Dietary intake and gastrointestinal and mental health symptoms were assessed using a food frequency questionnaire, the Dutch Healthy Diet-15 index, the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale, and hospital anxiety and depression scores, respectively. Machine-learning approaches were applied to identify microbiota-based phenotypical clusters, which were compared with established Rome III subtypes, and associated with faecal VOCs, gastrointestinal symptom severity, diet and mental health. 178 IBS patients and 134 healthy controls were included. Gut microbiota composition distinguished IBS patients from healthy controls with an AUCROC 0 · 8. This discriminatory profile was not associated with Rome III subtypes, while statistically significant associations were found with faecal VOCs profiles (i.e.<i>R</i>= 0 · 67,<i>p</i>= 4 · 46e-4) and symptom severity scores of abdominal pain (<i>p</i>= 0 · 05), reflux (<i>p</i>= 0 · 03), diarrhoea (<i>p</i>= 0 · 01) and depression (<i>p</i>< 0 · 001). Dietary associations varied across clusters. These results suggest that gut microbiota profiling might provide a basis to define relevant IBS endotypes. Further exploration and validation efforts into this direction are needed using longitudinal studies to refine IBS patient stratification ultimately.</p>","PeriodicalId":15306,"journal":{"name":"Journal of breath research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of breath research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/aeb043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is heterogenous disorder of gut-brain interaction, with a key role for the dysregulated host-gut microbiota interplay. IBS subtyping is based only on symptoms of bowel habits, reflecting limited insight into underlying biological mechanisms. This study aimed to define microbiota-based IBS phenotypes and to compare these to traditional stool-based subtyping. The study utilized data from the Maastricht IBS cohort. Gut microbiota composition was analysed using shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Faecal volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were measured by gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Dietary intake and gastrointestinal and mental health symptoms were assessed using a food frequency questionnaire, the Dutch Healthy Diet-15 index, the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale, and hospital anxiety and depression scores, respectively. Machine-learning approaches were applied to identify microbiota-based phenotypical clusters, which were compared with established Rome III subtypes, and associated with faecal VOCs, gastrointestinal symptom severity, diet and mental health. 178 IBS patients and 134 healthy controls were included. Gut microbiota composition distinguished IBS patients from healthy controls with an AUCROC 0 · 8. This discriminatory profile was not associated with Rome III subtypes, while statistically significant associations were found with faecal VOCs profiles (i.e.R= 0 · 67,p= 4 · 46e-4) and symptom severity scores of abdominal pain (p= 0 · 05), reflux (p= 0 · 03), diarrhoea (p= 0 · 01) and depression (p< 0 · 001). Dietary associations varied across clusters. These results suggest that gut microbiota profiling might provide a basis to define relevant IBS endotypes. Further exploration and validation efforts into this direction are needed using longitudinal studies to refine IBS patient stratification ultimately.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Breath Research is dedicated to all aspects of scientific breath research. The traditional focus is on analysis of volatile compounds and aerosols in exhaled breath for the investigation of exogenous exposures, metabolism, toxicology, health status and the diagnosis of disease and breath odours. The journal also welcomes other breath-related topics.
Typical areas of interest include:
Big laboratory instrumentation: describing new state-of-the-art analytical instrumentation capable of performing high-resolution discovery and targeted breath research; exploiting complex technologies drawn from other areas of biochemistry and genetics for breath research.
Engineering solutions: developing new breath sampling technologies for condensate and aerosols, for chemical and optical sensors, for extraction and sample preparation methods, for automation and standardization, and for multiplex analyses to preserve the breath matrix and facilitating analytical throughput. Measure exhaled constituents (e.g. CO2, acetone, isoprene) as markers of human presence or mitigate such contaminants in enclosed environments.
Human and animal in vivo studies: decoding the ''breath exposome'', implementing exposure and intervention studies, performing cross-sectional and case-control research, assaying immune and inflammatory response, and testing mammalian host response to infections and exogenous exposures to develop information directly applicable to systems biology. Studying inhalation toxicology; inhaled breath as a source of internal dose; resultant blood, breath and urinary biomarkers linked to inhalation pathway.
Cellular and molecular level in vitro studies.
Clinical, pharmacological and forensic applications.
Mathematical, statistical and graphical data interpretation.