Psychological Support in Prenatal Diagnosis: The Parental Perspective.

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Virginia Rinaldi, Lucia Bonisoli, Rosella Giuliani, Marcella Caputi, Alessandro Cuder, Giuseppina Battain, Sandra Pellizzoni
{"title":"Psychological Support in Prenatal Diagnosis: The Parental Perspective.","authors":"Virginia Rinaldi, Lucia Bonisoli, Rosella Giuliani, Marcella Caputi, Alessandro Cuder, Giuseppina Battain, Sandra Pellizzoni","doi":"10.1007/s10880-026-10168-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The communication of a diagnosis of fetal malformation is a very complex event for the parental couple to experience. The aim of the study is to report a planned evaluation of an ongoing psychological support within a prenatal diagnosis clinic, examining the extent to which it represents a source of support service for parental couples. An ad hoc semi-structured questionnaire was administered to couples who had received a prenatal diagnosis of fetal malformation, regardless of whether they had received psychological support. Descriptive analyses were performed on quantitative items, while an inductive thematic analysis was applied to open-ended responses to identify recurring themes. The results show that the majority of couples who used the support reported being satisfied with it. The ultrasound examination and specialist consultation were considered by the majority of the participants to be the most appropriate moments to receive the counseling. On the other hand, 41.38% of the couples who did not receive support would have liked to have received it. Finally, the majority of the couples, regardless of whether they received psychological support, would recommend that couples in similar situations seek psychological support and that other hospital facilities integrate such services. The results show that among couples who have received psychological support, most reported having benefited from it. In the absence of the psychologist within the multidisciplinary team, however, only a few participants have actively requested it. The findings are discussed in terms of the clinical relevance of psychological support at the time of fetal diagnostic assessments and specialist consultation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15494,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-026-10168-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The communication of a diagnosis of fetal malformation is a very complex event for the parental couple to experience. The aim of the study is to report a planned evaluation of an ongoing psychological support within a prenatal diagnosis clinic, examining the extent to which it represents a source of support service for parental couples. An ad hoc semi-structured questionnaire was administered to couples who had received a prenatal diagnosis of fetal malformation, regardless of whether they had received psychological support. Descriptive analyses were performed on quantitative items, while an inductive thematic analysis was applied to open-ended responses to identify recurring themes. The results show that the majority of couples who used the support reported being satisfied with it. The ultrasound examination and specialist consultation were considered by the majority of the participants to be the most appropriate moments to receive the counseling. On the other hand, 41.38% of the couples who did not receive support would have liked to have received it. Finally, the majority of the couples, regardless of whether they received psychological support, would recommend that couples in similar situations seek psychological support and that other hospital facilities integrate such services. The results show that among couples who have received psychological support, most reported having benefited from it. In the absence of the psychologist within the multidisciplinary team, however, only a few participants have actively requested it. The findings are discussed in terms of the clinical relevance of psychological support at the time of fetal diagnostic assessments and specialist consultation.

产前诊断中的心理支持:父母的视角。
胎儿畸形诊断的沟通对父母夫妇来说是一个非常复杂的事件。本研究的目的是报告一项产前诊断诊所内正在进行的心理支持的计划评估,检查它在多大程度上代表了父母夫妇的支持服务来源。一份特设的半结构化问卷被发给了产前诊断为胎儿畸形的夫妇,不管他们是否接受了心理支持。对定量项目进行描述性分析,而对开放式回答进行归纳主题分析,以确定反复出现的主题。结果显示,大多数使用这种支持的夫妇都表示对这种支持感到满意。大多数参与者认为超声检查和专家咨询是接受咨询的最合适时机。另一方面,41.38%没有得到支持的夫妇希望得到支持。最后,大多数夫妇,无论是否得到心理支持,都会建议处于类似情况的夫妇寻求心理支持,并建议其他医院设施整合这种服务。结果显示,在接受过心理支持的夫妇中,大多数人都表示自己从中受益。然而,在多学科团队中缺少心理学家的情况下,只有少数参与者主动提出要求。研究结果讨论了在胎儿诊断评估和专家咨询时心理支持的临床相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers related to all areas of the science and practice of psychologists in medical settings. Manuscripts are chosen that have a broad appeal across psychology as well as other health care disciplines, reflecting varying backgrounds, interests, and specializations. The journal publishes original research, treatment outcome trials, meta-analyses, literature reviews, conceptual papers, brief scientific reports, and scholarly case studies. Papers accepted address clinical matters in medical settings; integrated care; health disparities; education and training of the future psychology workforce; interdisciplinary collaboration, training, and professionalism; licensing, credentialing, and privileging in hospital practice; research and practice ethics; professional development of psychologists in academic health centers; professional practice matters in medical settings; and cultural, economic, political, regulatory, and systems factors in health care. In summary, the journal provides a forum for papers predicted to have significant theoretical or practical importance for the application of psychology in medical settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书