High-Content Screening Comparison of 1R6F Cigarette Smoke Extract and Selected Heated Tobacco and Electronic Vapour Product Aerosol Extracts in Endothelial and Bronchial Epithelial Cell Models.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY
Edgar Trelles Sticken, Konstantinos Papikinos, Fiona Chapman, Roman Wieczorek, Sarah Jean Pour, Torge Evenburg, Sandra Otte, Tiandan Wu, Liam Simms, Matthew Stevenson
{"title":"High-Content Screening Comparison of 1R6F Cigarette Smoke Extract and Selected Heated Tobacco and Electronic Vapour Product Aerosol Extracts in Endothelial and Bronchial Epithelial Cell Models.","authors":"Edgar Trelles Sticken, Konstantinos Papikinos, Fiona Chapman, Roman Wieczorek, Sarah Jean Pour, Torge Evenburg, Sandra Otte, Tiandan Wu, Liam Simms, Matthew Stevenson","doi":"10.1002/jat.70448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cigarettes induce oxidative stress and DNA damage, processes that contribute to cardiovascular and pulmonary disease. High content screening (HCS) is an increasingly valuable tool for comparative toxicology because it enables simultaneous quantification of multiple mechanistic endpoints at single-cell resolution. In this study, HCS was used to compare the biological activity of extracts from reference cigarette 1R6F smoke and aerosol extracts from one heated tobacco product and two electronic vapour products in human coronary artery endothelial cells and bronchial epithelial cells. Endpoints included reactive oxygen species generation, glutathione depletion, γH2AX induction as a marker of DNA double-strand break signalling and NRF2 translocation as an indicator of oxidative stress signalling. 1R6F cigarette smoke extract showed the highest cytotoxic and genotoxic responses, whereas the selected HTP and EVP aerosol extracts generally showed lower potency, with higher minimum effective concentrations across several endpoints under the tested conditions. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) attenuated several responses, supporting oxidative stress as an important contributor to the observed cellular effects. Overall, under the tested in vitro conditions, extracts from the selected HTP and EVP products showed lower potency across several oxidative stress-, genotoxicity- and cytotoxicity-associated endpoints than 1R6F cigarette smoke extract. These findings support product-specific comparative in vitro bioactivity assessment but do not directly establish reduced human health risk, product safety or clinical harm reduction. The study extends previous HCS work by integrating potency-based comparisons, mechanistic interrogation using NAC and cross-tissue evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15242,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.70448","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cigarettes induce oxidative stress and DNA damage, processes that contribute to cardiovascular and pulmonary disease. High content screening (HCS) is an increasingly valuable tool for comparative toxicology because it enables simultaneous quantification of multiple mechanistic endpoints at single-cell resolution. In this study, HCS was used to compare the biological activity of extracts from reference cigarette 1R6F smoke and aerosol extracts from one heated tobacco product and two electronic vapour products in human coronary artery endothelial cells and bronchial epithelial cells. Endpoints included reactive oxygen species generation, glutathione depletion, γH2AX induction as a marker of DNA double-strand break signalling and NRF2 translocation as an indicator of oxidative stress signalling. 1R6F cigarette smoke extract showed the highest cytotoxic and genotoxic responses, whereas the selected HTP and EVP aerosol extracts generally showed lower potency, with higher minimum effective concentrations across several endpoints under the tested conditions. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) attenuated several responses, supporting oxidative stress as an important contributor to the observed cellular effects. Overall, under the tested in vitro conditions, extracts from the selected HTP and EVP products showed lower potency across several oxidative stress-, genotoxicity- and cytotoxicity-associated endpoints than 1R6F cigarette smoke extract. These findings support product-specific comparative in vitro bioactivity assessment but do not directly establish reduced human health risk, product safety or clinical harm reduction. The study extends previous HCS work by integrating potency-based comparisons, mechanistic interrogation using NAC and cross-tissue evaluation.

1R6F香烟烟雾提取物和选定加热烟草和电子蒸汽产品气溶胶提取物在内皮和支气管上皮细胞模型中的高含量筛选比较
香烟会引起氧化应激和DNA损伤,这些过程会导致心血管和肺部疾病。高含量筛选(HCS)是比较毒理学中越来越有价值的工具,因为它可以在单细胞分辨率下同时定量多个机制终点。在本研究中,HCS用于比较参考卷烟1R6F烟雾提取物和一种加热烟草产品和两种电子蒸汽产品的气溶胶提取物在人冠状动脉内皮细胞和支气管上皮细胞中的生物活性。终点包括活性氧生成、谷胱甘肽耗竭、γ - h2ax诱导(DNA双链断裂信号标志)和NRF2易位(氧化应激信号标志)。1R6F香烟烟雾提取物表现出最高的细胞毒性和基因毒性反应,而选定的HTP和EVP气溶胶提取物一般表现出较低的效力,在测试条件下,在几个终点上具有较高的最低有效浓度。n -乙酰半胱氨酸(NAC)减弱了几种反应,支持氧化应激作为观察到的细胞效应的重要贡献者。总体而言,在体外测试条件下,选定的HTP和EVP产品提取物在几个氧化应激、遗传毒性和细胞毒性相关终点上的效力低于1R6F香烟烟雾提取物。这些发现支持产品特异性的体外生物活性比较评估,但不能直接确定降低人类健康风险、产品安全性或减少临床危害。该研究通过整合基于电位的比较、使用NAC的机制询问和跨组织评估来扩展先前的HCS工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
145
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Toxicology publishes peer-reviewed original reviews and hypothesis-driven research articles on mechanistic, fundamental and applied research relating to the toxicity of drugs and chemicals at the molecular, cellular, tissue, target organ and whole body level in vivo (by all relevant routes of exposure) and in vitro / ex vivo. All aspects of toxicology are covered (including but not limited to nanotoxicology, genomics and proteomics, teratogenesis, carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, reproductive and endocrine toxicology, toxicopathology, target organ toxicity, systems toxicity (eg immunotoxicity), neurobehavioral toxicology, mechanistic studies, biochemical and molecular toxicology, novel biomarkers, pharmacokinetics/PBPK, risk assessment and environmental health studies) and emphasis is given to papers of clear application to human health, and/or advance mechanistic understanding and/or provide significant contributions and impact to their field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书