Real-World Comparative Effectiveness of Mepolizumab versus Benralizumab in an Older Population with Asthma: A US Medicare Fee-for-Service Analysis.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Journal of Asthma and Allergy Pub Date : 2026-09-26 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JAA.S646978
Guillaume Germain, Emmeline Burrows, Jacob Klimek, Patrick Gravelle, Kioumars Tavakoli Tafti, François Laliberté, Arijita Deb
{"title":"Real-World Comparative Effectiveness of Mepolizumab versus Benralizumab in an Older Population with Asthma: A US Medicare Fee-for-Service Analysis.","authors":"Guillaume Germain, Emmeline Burrows, Jacob Klimek, Patrick Gravelle, Kioumars Tavakoli Tafti, François Laliberté, Arijita Deb","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S646978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biologic therapies, including mepolizumab and benralizumab, are used to treat uncontrolled asthma. However, real-world evidence comparing these treatments is limited. This study compared asthma-related hospitalizations and asthma exacerbations between mepolizumab and benralizumab among Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries with asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained from Komodo Research Database (01/01/2018-05/31/2025). Eligible patients included Medicare FFS beneficiaries with asthma and a first claim for mepolizumab or benralizumab on or after January 1, 2019 (index date). An adherent subgroup included those who remained adherent to their index biologic for ≥6 months. Overlap weighting based on a propensity score model was used to balance cohorts. Asthma-related hospitalizations and asthma exacerbations were evaluated while on treatment. Rates were reported as the number of events per-patient-year (PPY) and compared between weighted cohorts using rate ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Non-inferiority using a fixed-margin approach was used to compare rates of asthma-related hospitalizations between cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 125 and 177 patients were included in the mepolizumab and benralizumab cohorts, respectively (mean age: 70.7 years, 69.1 years). After weighting, baseline characteristics were well-balanced. At 1-year post-index, mepolizumab demonstrated superiority over benralizumab for asthma-related hospitalizations, showing a 77% rate reduction (0.036 PPY vs 0.155 PPY; RR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.74; p=0.013) and was associated with comparable rates of asthma exacerbations (1.056 PPY vs 1.302 PPY; RR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.52, 1.26; p=0.348). In the adherent subgroup, mepolizumab remained superior to benralizumab for asthma-related hospitalizations (0.040 PPY vs 0.167 PPY; RR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.79; p=0.019) and remained associated with comparable rates of asthma exacerbations (0.927 PPY vs 1.249 PPY; RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.44, 1.25; p=0.265). Consistent results were observed at 2-years post-index.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mepolizumab was superior to benralizumab for asthma-related hospitalizations, while asthma exacerbation rates were comparable between the two therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"19 ","pages":"646978"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13625837/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S646978","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Biologic therapies, including mepolizumab and benralizumab, are used to treat uncontrolled asthma. However, real-world evidence comparing these treatments is limited. This study compared asthma-related hospitalizations and asthma exacerbations between mepolizumab and benralizumab among Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries with asthma.

Methods: Data were obtained from Komodo Research Database (01/01/2018-05/31/2025). Eligible patients included Medicare FFS beneficiaries with asthma and a first claim for mepolizumab or benralizumab on or after January 1, 2019 (index date). An adherent subgroup included those who remained adherent to their index biologic for ≥6 months. Overlap weighting based on a propensity score model was used to balance cohorts. Asthma-related hospitalizations and asthma exacerbations were evaluated while on treatment. Rates were reported as the number of events per-patient-year (PPY) and compared between weighted cohorts using rate ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Non-inferiority using a fixed-margin approach was used to compare rates of asthma-related hospitalizations between cohorts.

Results: In total, 125 and 177 patients were included in the mepolizumab and benralizumab cohorts, respectively (mean age: 70.7 years, 69.1 years). After weighting, baseline characteristics were well-balanced. At 1-year post-index, mepolizumab demonstrated superiority over benralizumab for asthma-related hospitalizations, showing a 77% rate reduction (0.036 PPY vs 0.155 PPY; RR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.74; p=0.013) and was associated with comparable rates of asthma exacerbations (1.056 PPY vs 1.302 PPY; RR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.52, 1.26; p=0.348). In the adherent subgroup, mepolizumab remained superior to benralizumab for asthma-related hospitalizations (0.040 PPY vs 0.167 PPY; RR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.79; p=0.019) and remained associated with comparable rates of asthma exacerbations (0.927 PPY vs 1.249 PPY; RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.44, 1.25; p=0.265). Consistent results were observed at 2-years post-index.

Conclusion: Mepolizumab was superior to benralizumab for asthma-related hospitalizations, while asthma exacerbation rates were comparable between the two therapies.

Mepolizumab与Benralizumab在老年哮喘患者中的实际疗效比较:美国医疗保险服务收费分析
背景:生物疗法,包括mepolizumab和benralizumab,被用于治疗不受控制的哮喘。然而,比较这些治疗方法的真实证据是有限的。本研究比较了mepolizumab和benralizumab在医疗保险按服务收费(FFS)哮喘受益人中与哮喘相关的住院和哮喘加重。方法:数据来源于Komodo Research Database(01/01/2018-05/31/2025)。符合条件的患者包括患有哮喘的医疗保险FFS受益人,并且在2019年1月1日(索引日期)或之后首次申请mepolizumab或benralizumab。坚持亚组包括坚持使用其指标生物制剂≥6个月的患者。使用基于倾向评分模型的重叠加权来平衡队列。在治疗期间评估哮喘相关住院和哮喘恶化情况。发生率报告为每患者年(PPY)的事件数,并使用95%置信区间(ci)的发生率比(rr)在加权队列之间进行比较。采用固定边际的非劣效性方法比较队列间哮喘相关住院率。结果:共有125例和177例患者分别被纳入mepolizumab和benralizumab队列(平均年龄:70.7岁,69.1岁)。加权后,基线特征平衡良好。在指数后1年,mepolizumab在哮喘相关住院方面优于benralizumab,显示77%的发生率降低(0.036 PPY vs 0.155 PPY; RR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.74; p=0.013),并且与哮喘加重率相关(1.056 PPY vs 1.302 PPY; RR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.52, 1.26; p=0.348)。在粘附亚组中,mepolizumab在哮喘相关住院方面仍然优于benralizumab (0.040 PPY vs 0.167 PPY; RR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.79; p=0.019),并且仍然与哮喘发作率相关(0.927 PPY vs 1.249 PPY; RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.44, 1.25; p=0.265)。2年后观察到一致的结果。结论:Mepolizumab在哮喘相关住院治疗方面优于benralizumab,而两种疗法之间的哮喘加重率相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Asthma and Allergy
Journal of Asthma and Allergy Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
185
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, reports, editorials and commentaries on the following topics: Asthma; Pulmonary physiology; Asthma related clinical health; Clinical immunology and the immunological basis of disease; Pharmacological interventions and new therapies. Although the main focus of the journal will be to publish research and clinical results in humans, preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书