{"title":"Characterization of animal tissues for Monte Carlo simulations in ion beam therapy","authors":"Liu Xiaoli, Michael F. Moyers","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To obtain better elemental compositions (ECs), physical densities (PDs), and relative linear stopping powers (RLSPs) of tissues scanned by single or dual energy computed tomography for use by Monte Carlo (MC) simulations of light ion beam therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and materials</h3>\n \n <p>The RLSPs of 12 animal tissue samples were measured using several different energy proton and carbon ion beams. The EC of each sample was analyzed using the following modern laboratory techniques: Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), organic elemental analysis (OEA), and ion chromatography (IC). RLSPs were calculated from both measured ECs and literature ECs and then compared with measured RLSPs. All samples underwent single-energy CT (SECT) and dual-energy CT (DECT) scanning after which a dual-energy index (DEI) was derived. A mapping from computed tomography number (CTN) and DEI to PD was performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>For each tissue sample, the measured RLSPs showed no significant dependence on beam energy or ion species, with all values agreeing to within ± 1% except for lung (within ± 2%). RLSPs directly measured and those calculated using measured PDs and ECs agreed within ± 2% except for lung. Measured RLSPs were slightly closer to values from laboratory-determined ECs than to literature ECs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>RLSP measurements were independent of beam energy and ion species. The main determinants of accurate CTN to RLSP conversion are the PDs and fractional hydrogen content of the tissues. The accuracy of PD and EC for input into Monte Carlo transport calculations can be improved by combining DEI and scaled CTN.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"27 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13639258/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70836","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To obtain better elemental compositions (ECs), physical densities (PDs), and relative linear stopping powers (RLSPs) of tissues scanned by single or dual energy computed tomography for use by Monte Carlo (MC) simulations of light ion beam therapy.
Methods and materials
The RLSPs of 12 animal tissue samples were measured using several different energy proton and carbon ion beams. The EC of each sample was analyzed using the following modern laboratory techniques: Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), organic elemental analysis (OEA), and ion chromatography (IC). RLSPs were calculated from both measured ECs and literature ECs and then compared with measured RLSPs. All samples underwent single-energy CT (SECT) and dual-energy CT (DECT) scanning after which a dual-energy index (DEI) was derived. A mapping from computed tomography number (CTN) and DEI to PD was performed.
Results
For each tissue sample, the measured RLSPs showed no significant dependence on beam energy or ion species, with all values agreeing to within ± 1% except for lung (within ± 2%). RLSPs directly measured and those calculated using measured PDs and ECs agreed within ± 2% except for lung. Measured RLSPs were slightly closer to values from laboratory-determined ECs than to literature ECs.
Conclusions
RLSP measurements were independent of beam energy and ion species. The main determinants of accurate CTN to RLSP conversion are the PDs and fractional hydrogen content of the tissues. The accuracy of PD and EC for input into Monte Carlo transport calculations can be improved by combining DEI and scaled CTN.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic