Early Mitral Valve Surgery and Survival in Asymptomatic Severe Primary Mitral Regurgitation.

IF 11.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Juhee Ahn, Soongu Kwak, Jaehyun Lim, Kyu Kim, Jihoon Kim, Byung Joo Sun, Dae-Hee Kim, Kyung Hwan Kim, Chi Young Shim, Sung-Ji Park, Sungho Won, Seung-Pyo Lee
{"title":"Early Mitral Valve Surgery and Survival in Asymptomatic Severe Primary Mitral Regurgitation.","authors":"Juhee Ahn, Soongu Kwak, Jaehyun Lim, Kyu Kim, Jihoon Kim, Byung Joo Sun, Dae-Hee Kim, Kyung Hwan Kim, Chi Young Shim, Sung-Ji Park, Sungho Won, Seung-Pyo Lee","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.37061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The optimal timing of mitral valve (MV) surgery in patients with asymptomatic severe primary mitral regurgitation (MR) remains uncertain because randomized clinical trials are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association of early MV surgery with long-term survival in patients with asymptomatic severe primary MR using a target trial emulation framework.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study used a clinical valve registry from 3 tertiary hospitals in South Korea between 2000 and 2022. Patients with asymptomatic severe primary MR were analyzed using a clone-censor-weight approach to emulate a target trial. A 6-month grace period after diagnosis was used to define treatment strategies. This analysis was conducted from September 2024 to January 2025.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Early MV surgery (within 6 months of diagnosis) vs watchful waiting.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was all-cause mortality and the secondary outcome, a composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization. Inverse probability of censoring-weighted estimates of the per-protocol effect size included restricted mean survival time (RMST) differences as the primary measure and hazard ratios (HRs) as secondary measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 802 patients (mean [SD] age, 55 [16] years; 476 men [59%]), 344 underwent early surgery, and 458 received watchful waiting. During a median (IQR) follow-up of 7.4 (4.1-11.6) years, 27 deaths occurred in the early surgery group and 103 in the watchful waiting group. At 5 years, early surgery was associated with an RMST gain of 66 days (95% CI, 19-129 days). The survival benefit persisted up to 15 years. Early surgery was also associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality compared with watchful waiting (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.41-0.94; P = .02). Similar associations were observed in patients without left ventricular decompensation (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.31-0.96; P = .04) and in those with degenerative MR (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.36-0.98; P = .04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this multicenter cohort study with a target trial framework, early surgery was associated with improved long-term survival among patients with asymptomatic severe primary MR. These findings support consideration of earlier surgical intervention in contemporary clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"9 10","pages":"e2637061"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13639776/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.37061","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: The optimal timing of mitral valve (MV) surgery in patients with asymptomatic severe primary mitral regurgitation (MR) remains uncertain because randomized clinical trials are lacking.

Objective: To evaluate the association of early MV surgery with long-term survival in patients with asymptomatic severe primary MR using a target trial emulation framework.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study used a clinical valve registry from 3 tertiary hospitals in South Korea between 2000 and 2022. Patients with asymptomatic severe primary MR were analyzed using a clone-censor-weight approach to emulate a target trial. A 6-month grace period after diagnosis was used to define treatment strategies. This analysis was conducted from September 2024 to January 2025.

Exposure: Early MV surgery (within 6 months of diagnosis) vs watchful waiting.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality and the secondary outcome, a composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization. Inverse probability of censoring-weighted estimates of the per-protocol effect size included restricted mean survival time (RMST) differences as the primary measure and hazard ratios (HRs) as secondary measures.

Results: Among 802 patients (mean [SD] age, 55 [16] years; 476 men [59%]), 344 underwent early surgery, and 458 received watchful waiting. During a median (IQR) follow-up of 7.4 (4.1-11.6) years, 27 deaths occurred in the early surgery group and 103 in the watchful waiting group. At 5 years, early surgery was associated with an RMST gain of 66 days (95% CI, 19-129 days). The survival benefit persisted up to 15 years. Early surgery was also associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality compared with watchful waiting (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.41-0.94; P = .02). Similar associations were observed in patients without left ventricular decompensation (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.31-0.96; P = .04) and in those with degenerative MR (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.36-0.98; P = .04).

Conclusions and relevance: In this multicenter cohort study with a target trial framework, early surgery was associated with improved long-term survival among patients with asymptomatic severe primary MR. These findings support consideration of earlier surgical intervention in contemporary clinical practice.

早期二尖瓣手术与无症状严重原发性二尖瓣返流的生存率。
重要性:由于缺乏随机临床试验,无症状严重原发性二尖瓣反流(MR)患者二尖瓣(MV)手术的最佳时机仍然不确定。目的:利用目标试验模拟框架评估早期MV手术与无症状严重原发性MR患者长期生存的关系。设计、环境和参与者:本队列研究使用了2000年至2022年间韩国3家三级医院的临床瓣膜登记。无症状严重原发性MR患者分析使用克隆-检查员-重量方法模拟靶试验。诊断后6个月的宽限期用于确定治疗策略。这项分析是在2024年9月至2025年1月期间进行的。暴露:早期中压手术(诊断后6个月内)vs观察等待。主要结局和指标:主要结局是全因死亡率,次要结局是全因死亡率或心力衰竭住院的综合结果。审查加权估计每个方案效应大小的逆概率包括限制平均生存时间(RMST)差异作为主要测量,风险比(hr)作为次要测量。结果:802例患者(平均[SD]年龄55岁,男性476例[59%]),早期手术344例,观察等待458例。在中位(IQR)随访7.4(4.1-11.6)年期间,早期手术组有27例死亡,观察等待组有103例死亡。5年时,早期手术与RMST增加66天相关(95% CI, 19-129天)。这种生存优势持续了15年。与观察等待相比,早期手术也与全因死亡风险降低相关(HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.41-0.94; P = 0.02)。在无左心室失代偿的患者中观察到类似的关联(HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.31-0.96; P =。04)和退行性磁共振(HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.36-0.98; P = 0.04)。结论和相关性:在这项具有目标试验框架的多中心队列研究中,早期手术与无症状严重原发性mr患者的长期生存率提高有关。这些发现支持了在当代临床实践中早期手术干预的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书