Family-Centered Care and Outcomes of Child Flourishing and Family Resilience and Connection.

IF 11.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Anna E Austin, Christine K Thang, Sasha S Svendsen
{"title":"Family-Centered Care and Outcomes of Child Flourishing and Family Resilience and Connection.","authors":"Anna E Austin, Christine K Thang, Sasha S Svendsen","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.31265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Family-centered care is an approach to pediatric health care that recognizes the essential role of the family in ensuring child health and well-being, seeks to establish collaborative partnerships among the child, family, and health care team, and provides a framework for implementing trauma-informed care. However, the association between receiving family-centered care and key measures of child and family well-being, including among families with a history of trauma and adversity, is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine associations between family-centered care and child flourishing and family resilience and connection among US children and to assess whether associations differ by the child's history of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs).</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study used 2021 to 2024 National Survey of Children's Health data from children aged 6 to 17 years. Analyses were conducted in September to December 2025.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Caregiver report of receipt of family-centered care by the child's physician or other health care practitioners in the past 12 months.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Child flourishing and family resilience and connection based on caregiver response to established measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study assessed 110 984 children (mean [SD] age, 11.5 [0.02], years; 57 302 [51.0%] male and 53 682 [49.0%] female) who had a health care visit in the past 12 months. Adjusted for potential confounders, the prevalence of child flourishing was 8.6 percentage points higher (prevalence difference [PD], 0.086; 95% CI, 0.072-0.101), and the prevalence of family resilience and connection was 8.2 percentage points higher (PD, 0.082; 95% CI, 0.069-0.096) for those who received family-centered care compared with those who did not. Among children with and without ACEs, the prevalence of child flourishing (with ACES: PD, 0.112; 95% CI, 0.089-0.132; without ACEs: PD, 0.068; 95% CI, 0.049-0.087) and family resilience and connection (with ACEs: PD, 0.105; 95% CI, 0.085-0.125; without ACEs: PD, 0.0563; 95% CI, 0.043-0.081) was higher for those who received family-centered care compared with those who did not, with larger estimates among children with ACEs than children without ACEs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Results from this cross-sectional study found that family-centered care was associated with a higher prevalence of child flourishing and family resilience and connection, particularly among those with a history of adversity. These results suggest that family-centered care offers a practical and measurable way for health care professionals to promote well-being for all children and families but particularly for children with a history of ACEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"9 10","pages":"e2631265"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13639759/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.31265","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Family-centered care is an approach to pediatric health care that recognizes the essential role of the family in ensuring child health and well-being, seeks to establish collaborative partnerships among the child, family, and health care team, and provides a framework for implementing trauma-informed care. However, the association between receiving family-centered care and key measures of child and family well-being, including among families with a history of trauma and adversity, is unknown.

Objectives: To examine associations between family-centered care and child flourishing and family resilience and connection among US children and to assess whether associations differ by the child's history of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs).

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study used 2021 to 2024 National Survey of Children's Health data from children aged 6 to 17 years. Analyses were conducted in September to December 2025.

Exposure: Caregiver report of receipt of family-centered care by the child's physician or other health care practitioners in the past 12 months.

Main outcomes and measures: Child flourishing and family resilience and connection based on caregiver response to established measures.

Results: This study assessed 110 984 children (mean [SD] age, 11.5 [0.02], years; 57 302 [51.0%] male and 53 682 [49.0%] female) who had a health care visit in the past 12 months. Adjusted for potential confounders, the prevalence of child flourishing was 8.6 percentage points higher (prevalence difference [PD], 0.086; 95% CI, 0.072-0.101), and the prevalence of family resilience and connection was 8.2 percentage points higher (PD, 0.082; 95% CI, 0.069-0.096) for those who received family-centered care compared with those who did not. Among children with and without ACEs, the prevalence of child flourishing (with ACES: PD, 0.112; 95% CI, 0.089-0.132; without ACEs: PD, 0.068; 95% CI, 0.049-0.087) and family resilience and connection (with ACEs: PD, 0.105; 95% CI, 0.085-0.125; without ACEs: PD, 0.0563; 95% CI, 0.043-0.081) was higher for those who received family-centered care compared with those who did not, with larger estimates among children with ACEs than children without ACEs.

Conclusions and relevance: Results from this cross-sectional study found that family-centered care was associated with a higher prevalence of child flourishing and family resilience and connection, particularly among those with a history of adversity. These results suggest that family-centered care offers a practical and measurable way for health care professionals to promote well-being for all children and families but particularly for children with a history of ACEs.

以家庭为中心的照料与儿童繁荣、家庭弹性和联系的结果。
重要性:以家庭为中心的护理是一种儿科保健方法,它认识到家庭在确保儿童健康和福祉方面的重要作用,寻求在儿童、家庭和保健团队之间建立合作伙伴关系,并提供实施创伤知情护理的框架。然而,接受以家庭为中心的护理与儿童和家庭幸福的关键指标之间的关系,包括有创伤和逆境历史的家庭,是未知的。目的:研究美国儿童中以家庭为中心的护理与儿童繁荣、家庭弹性和联系之间的联系,并评估儿童不良童年经历(ace)的历史是否会产生不同的联系。设计、环境和参与者:这项横断面研究使用了2021年至2024年6至17岁儿童的全国儿童健康调查数据。分析于2025年9月至12月进行。暴露:照料者报告在过去12个月内接受儿童医生或其他保健从业人员以家庭为中心的照料。主要结果和措施:基于照顾者对既定措施的反应的儿童繁荣和家庭复原力和联系。结果:本研究评估了过去12个月内就诊过的110 984名儿童(平均[SD]年龄11.5[0.02]岁;57 302[51.0%]名男性,53 682[49.0%]名女性)。对潜在的混杂因素进行调整后,接受以家庭为中心的护理的儿童的繁荣率比没有接受以家庭为中心的护理的儿童高8.6个百分点(患病率差异[PD], 0.086; 95% CI, 0.072-0.101),家庭弹性和联系的患病率比没有接受以家庭为中心的护理的儿童高8.2个百分点(PD, 0.082; 95% CI, 0.069-0.096)。在有和没有ace的儿童中,接受以家庭为中心的护理的儿童中,儿童繁荣(有ace: PD, 0.112; 95% CI, 0.089-0.132;没有ace: PD, 0.068; 95% CI, 0.049-0.087)和家庭恢复力和联系(有ace: PD, 0.105; 95% CI, 0.085-0.125;没有ace: PD, 0.0563; 95% CI, 0.043-0.081)的患病率高于没有接受家庭为中心护理的儿童,有ace的儿童比没有ace的儿童估计更高。结论和相关性:这项横断面研究的结果发现,以家庭为中心的护理与儿童繁荣、家庭弹性和联系的更高患病率有关,特别是在那些有逆境历史的儿童中。这些结果表明,以家庭为中心的护理为卫生保健专业人员提供了一种实用和可衡量的方式,以促进所有儿童和家庭的福祉,特别是有ace病史的儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书