Replicating motivational and cognitive-motivational typologies of doping attitudes among recreational fitness athletes: implications for harm reduction and risk communication.

IF 4.2 2区 社会学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
René Paasch, Gunnar Mau
{"title":"Replicating motivational and cognitive-motivational typologies of doping attitudes among recreational fitness athletes: implications for harm reduction and risk communication.","authors":"René Paasch, Gunnar Mau","doi":"10.1186/s12954-026-01546-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The non-medical use of image- and performance-enhancing drugs (IPEDs) in recreational fitness represents an important public health and harm-reduction challenge. While prevalence estimates provide useful benchmarks, they often obscure the motivational and cognitive-motivational heterogeneity underlying substance-use decisions and prevention needs in gym populations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study re-examined a previously published typology and evaluated its reproducibility of doping attitudes and prevention needs among German recreational fitness athletes using selected constructs from the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and the Health Belief Model (HBM), complemented by qualitative illustration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with 624 recreational athletes (64.1% male, 34.5% female, 1.4% diverse; Mage = 37.1, SD = 10.0). After data cleaning, the analytical sample comprised 550 participants. Four TPB/HBM-related scales with acceptable internal consistency (α = .78-.86) served as clustering variables. Ward's method followed by k-means clustering (k = 7, seed = 42) informed the retention of a seven-cluster solution (overall silhouette = .22; bootstrap-based reproducibility with B = 200 indicated moderate stability). Associations with lifetime use of anabolic-androgenic steroids (AAS), testosterone replacement therapy (TRT), and growth hormone (GH) were examined descriptively. Fifty-two open-ended responses to illustrate cluster-specific motivational and cognitive-motivational patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven distinct motivational and cognitive-motivational profiles were identified, with descriptively distinct profile patterns across TPB/HBM-related dimensions. Small but statistically significant associations were observed for AAS and TRT, whereas GH use did not differ significantly across profiles. Qualitative accounts illustrated contrasts between value-based abstainers, ambivalent risk-takers, performance-oriented rationalisers, and low-engagement groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The replication provides preliminary support for a seven-profile typology of IPED-related orientations in recreational fitness, indicating heterogeneous motivational patterns and prevention needs rather than a single risk continuum. Given the moderate stability observed in the bootstrap analyses, the typology should be interpreted cautiously at the individual level but may provide an exploratory framework for harm-reduction-oriented communication and prevention approaches in gym populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12922,"journal":{"name":"Harm Reduction Journal","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13632324/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harm Reduction Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-026-01546-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The non-medical use of image- and performance-enhancing drugs (IPEDs) in recreational fitness represents an important public health and harm-reduction challenge. While prevalence estimates provide useful benchmarks, they often obscure the motivational and cognitive-motivational heterogeneity underlying substance-use decisions and prevention needs in gym populations.

Objective: This study re-examined a previously published typology and evaluated its reproducibility of doping attitudes and prevention needs among German recreational fitness athletes using selected constructs from the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and the Health Belief Model (HBM), complemented by qualitative illustration.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with 624 recreational athletes (64.1% male, 34.5% female, 1.4% diverse; Mage = 37.1, SD = 10.0). After data cleaning, the analytical sample comprised 550 participants. Four TPB/HBM-related scales with acceptable internal consistency (α = .78-.86) served as clustering variables. Ward's method followed by k-means clustering (k = 7, seed = 42) informed the retention of a seven-cluster solution (overall silhouette = .22; bootstrap-based reproducibility with B = 200 indicated moderate stability). Associations with lifetime use of anabolic-androgenic steroids (AAS), testosterone replacement therapy (TRT), and growth hormone (GH) were examined descriptively. Fifty-two open-ended responses to illustrate cluster-specific motivational and cognitive-motivational patterns.

Results: Seven distinct motivational and cognitive-motivational profiles were identified, with descriptively distinct profile patterns across TPB/HBM-related dimensions. Small but statistically significant associations were observed for AAS and TRT, whereas GH use did not differ significantly across profiles. Qualitative accounts illustrated contrasts between value-based abstainers, ambivalent risk-takers, performance-oriented rationalisers, and low-engagement groups.

Conclusions: The replication provides preliminary support for a seven-profile typology of IPED-related orientations in recreational fitness, indicating heterogeneous motivational patterns and prevention needs rather than a single risk continuum. Given the moderate stability observed in the bootstrap analyses, the typology should be interpreted cautiously at the individual level but may provide an exploratory framework for harm-reduction-oriented communication and prevention approaches in gym populations.

在休闲健身运动员中复制兴奋剂态度的动机和认知动机类型:对减少伤害和风险沟通的影响。
背景:在休闲健身中非医疗使用提高形象和成绩的药物(IPEDs)是一个重要的公共卫生和减少危害的挑战。虽然患病率估计提供了有用的基准,但它们往往模糊了健身房人群中物质使用决策和预防需求背后的动机和认知动机异质性。目的:本研究利用计划行为理论(TPB)和健康信念模型(HBM)中选定的结构,并辅以定性说明,重新审视了先前发表的一种类型学,评估了其在德国休闲健身运动员中兴奋剂态度和预防需求的可重复性。方法:对624名休闲运动员进行横断面在线调查,其中男性64.1%,女性34.5%,异性1.4%,Mage = 37.1, SD = 10.0。数据清理后,分析样本包括550名参与者。4个具有可接受内部一致性(α = 0.78 ~ 0.86)的TPB/ hbm相关量表作为聚类变量。Ward的方法采用k-means聚类(k = 7, seed = 42),保留了七个聚类的解决方案(总体轮廓= 0.22;基于bootstrap的重现性,B = 200表示中等稳定性)。对终生使用合成代谢雄激素类固醇(AAS)、睾酮替代疗法(TRT)和生长激素(GH)的相关性进行了描述性研究。52个开放式回答,说明特定集群的动机和认知动机模式。结果:7种不同的动机和认知动机特征被识别出来,在TPB/ hbm相关维度上具有描述性的不同特征模式。在AAS和TRT中观察到微小但有统计学意义的关联,而生长激素的使用在不同的情况下没有显著差异。定性分析说明了基于价值的戒酒者、矛盾的风险承担者、以绩效为导向的理性主义者和低参与度群体之间的对比。结论:该研究为休闲健身中iped相关倾向的七种类型提供了初步支持,表明了异质性的动机模式和预防需求,而不是单一的风险连续体。鉴于在自举分析中观察到的适度稳定性,在个体层面上应该谨慎地解释类型学,但可能为健身房人群中以减少伤害为导向的交流和预防方法提供探索性框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Harm Reduction Journal
Harm Reduction Journal Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Harm Reduction Journal is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal whose focus is on the prevalent patterns of psychoactive drug use, the public policies meant to control them, and the search for effective methods of reducing the adverse medical, public health, and social consequences associated with both drugs and drug policies. We define "harm reduction" as "policies and programs which aim to reduce the health, social, and economic costs of legal and illegal psychoactive drug use without necessarily reducing drug consumption". We are especially interested in studies of the evolving patterns of drug use around the world, their implications for the spread of HIV/AIDS and other blood-borne pathogens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书