Are pain intensity measures interchangeable? agreement among ODI, SRS-22, and COMI in chronic low back pain with and without scoliosis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Carmelo Pulici, Tito Bassani, René Marten Castelein, Antonio Pizzicato, Silvano Ferrari, Stefano Negrini, Fabio Zaina
{"title":"Are pain intensity measures interchangeable? agreement among ODI, SRS-22, and COMI in chronic low back pain with and without scoliosis.","authors":"Carmelo Pulici, Tito Bassani, René Marten Castelein, Antonio Pizzicato, Silvano Ferrari, Stefano Negrini, Fabio Zaina","doi":"10.1007/s00586-026-10420-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pain intensity in chronic low back pain (CLBP) is often assessed using pain items embedded in multidimensional patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), but differences in scale format and recall period may limit score interchangeability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association and agreement among three commonly used pain intensity items derived from ODI, SRS-22, and COMI in adults with CLBP, with and without scoliosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary cross-sectional analysis of an observational cohort. From 1,092 eligible subjects (552 scoliosis-associated LBP; 540 non-scoliosis LBP), we included participants with complete pain items: ODI Item 1 (pain \"at the moment\", 1-6), SRS-22 pain item (past month, 1-5), and COMI pain (maximum of back/leg pain over the past week, 0-10). Agreement was assessed using Spearman's rho, Kendall's W, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), overall and by pathology group and sex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final sample included 417 adults (88% female; mean age 65 ± 10 years): 319 SLBP and 98 LBP. Across all subjects, correlations were moderate to strong (rho 0.50-0.70) with substantial ordinal agreement (W = 0.74) but only moderate quantitative concordance (ICC = 0.45). Estimates were similar in SLBP and LBP (rho 0.49-0.70; W 0.74-0.79; ICC 0.43-0.53) and did not differ by sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pain items from ODI, SRS-22, and COMI rank patients similarly but yield non-interchangeable absolute scores in CLBP, irrespective of scoliosis. Consistent instrument selection is recommended when comparing or pooling pain outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-026-10420-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Pain intensity in chronic low back pain (CLBP) is often assessed using pain items embedded in multidimensional patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), but differences in scale format and recall period may limit score interchangeability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association and agreement among three commonly used pain intensity items derived from ODI, SRS-22, and COMI in adults with CLBP, with and without scoliosis.

Methods: Secondary cross-sectional analysis of an observational cohort. From 1,092 eligible subjects (552 scoliosis-associated LBP; 540 non-scoliosis LBP), we included participants with complete pain items: ODI Item 1 (pain "at the moment", 1-6), SRS-22 pain item (past month, 1-5), and COMI pain (maximum of back/leg pain over the past week, 0-10). Agreement was assessed using Spearman's rho, Kendall's W, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), overall and by pathology group and sex.

Results: The final sample included 417 adults (88% female; mean age 65 ± 10 years): 319 SLBP and 98 LBP. Across all subjects, correlations were moderate to strong (rho 0.50-0.70) with substantial ordinal agreement (W = 0.74) but only moderate quantitative concordance (ICC = 0.45). Estimates were similar in SLBP and LBP (rho 0.49-0.70; W 0.74-0.79; ICC 0.43-0.53) and did not differ by sex.

Conclusions: Pain items from ODI, SRS-22, and COMI rank patients similarly but yield non-interchangeable absolute scores in CLBP, irrespective of scoliosis. Consistent instrument selection is recommended when comparing or pooling pain outcomes.

疼痛强度测量可以互换吗?ODI、SRS-22和COMI在伴和不伴脊柱侧凸的慢性腰痛中的一致性。
目的:慢性腰痛(CLBP)的疼痛强度通常使用多维患者报告结果测量(PROMs)中嵌入的疼痛项目进行评估,但量表格式和回忆期的差异可能限制评分的可互换性。本研究的目的是评估伴有和不伴有脊柱侧凸的成人CLBP患者中,ODI、SRS-22和COMI三种常用疼痛强度指标之间的相关性和一致性。方法:观察性队列的二次横断面分析。从1092名符合条件的受试者(552名脊柱侧凸相关的腰痛;540名非脊柱侧凸性的腰痛)中,我们纳入了具有完整疼痛项目的参与者:ODI项目1(疼痛“此刻”,1-6),SRS-22疼痛项目(过去一个月,1-5)和COMI疼痛(过去一周背部/腿部最大疼痛,0-10)。采用Spearman’s rho、Kendall’s W和类内相关系数(ICC)对总体、病理组和性别的一致性进行评估。结果:最终样本包括417名成年人(88%为女性,平均年龄65±10岁):319名SLBP和98名LBP。在所有受试者中,相关性为中等至强(rho 0.50-0.70),具有大量的序数一致性(W = 0.74),但只有中等的定量一致性(ICC = 0.45)。SLBP和LBP的估计值相似(rho 0.49-0.70; W 0.74-0.79; ICC 0.43-0.53),且无性别差异。结论:ODI、SRS-22和COMI的疼痛项目对患者的排名相似,但产生的CLBP绝对评分不可互换,与脊柱侧凸无关。在比较或汇总疼痛结果时,建议选择一致的器械。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书