From CBCT to Synthesized Extraoral Bitewing: A Patient-Specific Pipeline for Dose- and Cost-Free 2D Information Presentation and Clinical Decision Support.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Kemal Selcuk Yucel, Alp Pinarbasi, Beyza Yalvac Pinarbasi, Sedat Ozdogan, Ferhat Aydin, Kadir Yilmaz, Osman Furkan Cakmak, Duygu Polat, Busranur Yavuz, Emin Murat Canger, Dan Ruan
{"title":"From CBCT to Synthesized Extraoral Bitewing: A Patient-Specific Pipeline for Dose- and Cost-Free 2D Information Presentation and Clinical Decision Support.","authors":"Kemal Selcuk Yucel, Alp Pinarbasi, Beyza Yalvac Pinarbasi, Sedat Ozdogan, Ferhat Aydin, Kadir Yilmaz, Osman Furkan Cakmak, Duygu Polat, Busranur Yavuz, Emin Murat Canger, Dan Ruan","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twag066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate whether synthesized extraoral bitewing views generated from existing CBCT scans can support posterior-tooth assessment when CBCT is the initial imaging modality, without additional radiographic acquisition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively assembled 60 CBCT scans from three datasets encompassing diverse posterior jaw morphologies. We developed a computational pipeline to compute a patient specific dental arch, define a focal trough, and simulate extraoral bitewing acquisition using a panoramic inspired rotating source trajectory. Synthetic projections were generated using a Beer-Lambert forward model implemented in TIGRE and reconstructed into right and left synthesized extraoral bitewing views. Eight observers, including dental students and residents in endodontics, periodontics, and oral radiology scored posterior teeth for caries, periapical lesions, and periodontal bone loss using original CBCT images and synthesized extraoral bitewing views in separate sessions. A consensus of two oral radiology experts served as the reference. Performance was evaluated with false positive and false negative rates, specificity, F1 score, and AUC. Inter observer agreement was assessed with (weighted) kappa. Differences in AUC (ΔAUC) between CBCT and synthesized extraoral bitewing views were evaluated using bootstrap-derived 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with CBCT alone, synthesized extraoral bitewing views were associated with lower overdiagnosis for dental caries and periapical lesions (95% CI, 5.87-12.00 and 3.87-8.12,respectively) and reduced underdiagnosis for periodontal bone loss (95% CI, 10.12-18.37). Synthesized extraoral bitewing views showed higher ordinal AUC for dental caries and periodontal bone loss (mean ΔAUC,-0.12 to - 0.05 and -0.11 to - 0.04,respectively). No consistent improvement was observed for periapical lesion AUC, possibly due to small sample size and limited power.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When CBCT is the initial imaging modality, synthesized extraoral bitewing views derived from the existing scan may provide a complementary two-dimensional visualization for posterior-tooth assessment. In this reader study, the derived views were associated with shorter interpretation time and task-dependent changes in diagnostic performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twag066","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate whether synthesized extraoral bitewing views generated from existing CBCT scans can support posterior-tooth assessment when CBCT is the initial imaging modality, without additional radiographic acquisition.

Methods: We retrospectively assembled 60 CBCT scans from three datasets encompassing diverse posterior jaw morphologies. We developed a computational pipeline to compute a patient specific dental arch, define a focal trough, and simulate extraoral bitewing acquisition using a panoramic inspired rotating source trajectory. Synthetic projections were generated using a Beer-Lambert forward model implemented in TIGRE and reconstructed into right and left synthesized extraoral bitewing views. Eight observers, including dental students and residents in endodontics, periodontics, and oral radiology scored posterior teeth for caries, periapical lesions, and periodontal bone loss using original CBCT images and synthesized extraoral bitewing views in separate sessions. A consensus of two oral radiology experts served as the reference. Performance was evaluated with false positive and false negative rates, specificity, F1 score, and AUC. Inter observer agreement was assessed with (weighted) kappa. Differences in AUC (ΔAUC) between CBCT and synthesized extraoral bitewing views were evaluated using bootstrap-derived 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Compared with CBCT alone, synthesized extraoral bitewing views were associated with lower overdiagnosis for dental caries and periapical lesions (95% CI, 5.87-12.00 and 3.87-8.12,respectively) and reduced underdiagnosis for periodontal bone loss (95% CI, 10.12-18.37). Synthesized extraoral bitewing views showed higher ordinal AUC for dental caries and periodontal bone loss (mean ΔAUC,-0.12 to - 0.05 and -0.11 to - 0.04,respectively). No consistent improvement was observed for periapical lesion AUC, possibly due to small sample size and limited power.

Conclusion: When CBCT is the initial imaging modality, synthesized extraoral bitewing views derived from the existing scan may provide a complementary two-dimensional visualization for posterior-tooth assessment. In this reader study, the derived views were associated with shorter interpretation time and task-dependent changes in diagnostic performance.

从CBCT到合成口外咬合:一个针对患者的无剂量和无成本2D信息展示和临床决策支持的管道。
目的:评估当CBCT作为初始成像方式,无需额外的x线摄影采集时,由现有CBCT扫描生成的合成口外咬合视图是否可以支持牙后评估。方法:我们回顾性地收集了来自三个数据集的60个CBCT扫描,包括不同的后颌骨形态。我们开发了一个计算管道来计算患者特定的牙弓,定义焦点槽,并使用全景启发旋转源轨迹模拟口外咬翼采集。使用TIGRE实现的Beer-Lambert正演模型生成合成投影,并重建为左右合成的口外咬合视图。8名观察员,包括牙髓学、牙周学和口腔放射学的牙科学生和住院医生,分别使用原始的CBCT图像和合成的口外咬合图像,对后牙的龋齿、根尖周病变和牙周骨质流失进行评分。两位口腔放射学专家的共识作为参考。用假阳性和假阴性率、特异性、F1评分和AUC来评估表现。观察员间的一致性用(加权)kappa进行评估。使用bootstrap导出的95%置信区间评估CBCT和合成的口外咬合视图之间的AUC差异(ΔAUC)。结果:与单独的CBCT相比,综合口外咬合视图与龋齿和根尖周病变的低过度诊断率相关(95% CI分别为5.87-12.00和3.87-8.12),并减少了牙周骨质流失的低诊断率(95% CI为10.12-18.37)。综合口外咬合视图显示,龋齿和牙周骨质流失的有序AUC较高(平均值分别为ΔAUC,-0.12至- 0.05和-0.11至- 0.04)。没有观察到根尖周围病变AUC的持续改善,可能是由于样本量小和功率有限。结论:当CBCT为初始成像方式时,从现有扫描中获得的综合口外咬合视图可以为后牙评估提供补充的二维可视化。在这项读者研究中,衍生的观点与较短的解释时间和任务相关的诊断性能变化有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging. Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology. The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919 - Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks - Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks - Open access option - ISSN: 0250-832X - eISSN: 1476-542X
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书