A New Competence Standard Improves Nurses' Confidence in Readiness to Practice.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Julie Miller, Mary Stahl, Sara Grieshop, Devin Bowers
{"title":"A New Competence Standard Improves Nurses' Confidence in Readiness to Practice.","authors":"Julie Miller, Mary Stahl, Sara Grieshop, Devin Bowers","doi":"10.4037/ccn2026499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An evidence-informed competence framework, with measurable performance outcomes and knowledge, skills, and abilities metrics, and an implementation toolkit were developed and beta tested to determine nurse readiness for transitioning from orientation to autonomous practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate satisfaction and toolkit implementation and impact, and to identify opportunities for improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sites replaced their orientation methods with the competence framework, and beta testing took place over a 1-year period. Surveys before and after implementation measured orientee and nurse leader confidence in orientees' ability to recognize a change in stability, intervene for a change in stability, advocate on behalf of the patient, and provide safe patient care. Comparisons of length of orientation, satisfaction, and opportunities for improvement were assessed. Nurse retention at 1 year was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen progressive care and critical care units with 49 orientees completed the beta test; 24 orientees completed the before and after surveys. After beta testing, orientees reported increased confidence levels in all polled performance outcomes compared with before orientation. Most (92%) orientees reported the framework performance outcomes and knowledge, skills, and abilities metrics were moderately to completely effective in preparing them to work with minimal supervision. Most (88%) nurse leaders, educators, and preceptors rated these same outcomes and metrics as moderately to completely effective. Nurse retention at 1 year was 90%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The beta test demonstrated improvement in confidence in all polled areas, and 1-year retention outperformed the national average. The competence framework is effective in answering the question, How do leaders know when the nurse is ready to transition from orientation to more independent practice?</p>","PeriodicalId":10738,"journal":{"name":"Critical care nurse","volume":"46 5","pages":"36-45"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care nurse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2026499","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An evidence-informed competence framework, with measurable performance outcomes and knowledge, skills, and abilities metrics, and an implementation toolkit were developed and beta tested to determine nurse readiness for transitioning from orientation to autonomous practice.

Objective: To evaluate satisfaction and toolkit implementation and impact, and to identify opportunities for improvement.

Methods: Sites replaced their orientation methods with the competence framework, and beta testing took place over a 1-year period. Surveys before and after implementation measured orientee and nurse leader confidence in orientees' ability to recognize a change in stability, intervene for a change in stability, advocate on behalf of the patient, and provide safe patient care. Comparisons of length of orientation, satisfaction, and opportunities for improvement were assessed. Nurse retention at 1 year was determined.

Results: Thirteen progressive care and critical care units with 49 orientees completed the beta test; 24 orientees completed the before and after surveys. After beta testing, orientees reported increased confidence levels in all polled performance outcomes compared with before orientation. Most (92%) orientees reported the framework performance outcomes and knowledge, skills, and abilities metrics were moderately to completely effective in preparing them to work with minimal supervision. Most (88%) nurse leaders, educators, and preceptors rated these same outcomes and metrics as moderately to completely effective. Nurse retention at 1 year was 90%.

Conclusion: The beta test demonstrated improvement in confidence in all polled areas, and 1-year retention outperformed the national average. The competence framework is effective in answering the question, How do leaders know when the nurse is ready to transition from orientation to more independent practice?

新能力标准提高护士准备执业的信心。
背景:开发了一个循证能力框架,具有可衡量的绩效结果和知识、技能和能力指标,以及实施工具包,并进行了beta测试,以确定护士是否准备好从定向转向自主实践。目的:评价满意度和工具包的实施和影响,并确定改进的机会。方法:网站用能力框架取代了他们的定向方法,并进行了为期1年的beta测试。实施前后的调查测量了取向者和护士领导对取向者识别稳定性变化、干预稳定性变化、代表患者倡导和提供安全患者护理的能力的信心。比较定向的长度,满意度和改进的机会进行评估。随访1年,观察护士留用情况。结果:13个进展重症监护病房49名投诊者完成了beta测试;24位定向者完成了前后调查。在beta测试后,与入职前相比,入职者报告了对所有被调查绩效结果的信心水平提高。大多数(92%)的定向者报告说,框架的绩效结果和知识、技能和能力指标在准备他们在最少的监督下工作方面是适度到完全有效的。大多数(88%)护士领导、教育工作者和辅导员将这些相同的结果和指标评为中等到完全有效。1年的护士保留率为90%。结论:beta测试表明,所有被调查地区的信心都有所提高,1年的保留率超过了全国平均水平。能力框架有效地回答了以下问题:领导如何知道护士何时准备好从培训过渡到更独立的实践?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical care nurse
Critical care nurse 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Critical Care Nurse (CCN) is an official publication of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN). Authors are invited to submit manuscripts for consideration and peer review. Clinical topics must meet the mission of CCN and address nursing practice of acute and critically ill patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书