Quality of life in hyperkalemia: baseline analysis of a cohort study of management of hyperkalemia in patients with chronic kidney disease or heart failure in Japan.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Ken-Ei Sada, Hajime Yamazaki, Takafumi Wakita, Yosuke Yamamoto, Jui Wang, Yoshihiro Onishi, Tadateru Hamada, Ryotaro Ide, Masayoshi Takeda, Shunichi Fukuhara, Yugo Shibagaki
{"title":"Quality of life in hyperkalemia: baseline analysis of a cohort study of management of hyperkalemia in patients with chronic kidney disease or heart failure in Japan.","authors":"Ken-Ei Sada, Hajime Yamazaki, Takafumi Wakita, Yosuke Yamamoto, Jui Wang, Yoshihiro Onishi, Tadateru Hamada, Ryotaro Ide, Masayoshi Takeda, Shunichi Fukuhara, Yugo Shibagaki","doi":"10.1007/s10157-026-02951-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hyperkalemia is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and chronic heart failure (CHF), often leading to treatment dilemmas regarding renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors. Although potassium binders and dietary restrictions are central to chronic management, their quality-of-life (QOL) impact remains insufficiently described. This study aimed to characterize real-world treatment patterns and evaluate treatment impact on QOL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed baseline data from a prospective cohort in Japanese nephrology and cardiology outpatient clinics. Participants were adults with CKD (≥ stage G3) or CHF (New York Heart Association class II-IV) who initiated potassium binders within 6 months. Clinical data, serum potassium values, and patient-reported outcomes (generic QOL, disease/treatment-specific QOL, and adherence measures) were obtained at enrollment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 347 patients, the median age was 75 years, and 74% were male; 93% had CKD. At enrollment, 59% were prescribed a RAAS inhibitor. Dietary therapy was implemented in 29%. Physical scores of generic QOL were lower than population norms, whereas mental scores were comparable. Treatment-specific QOL scores suggested that potassium binders may have had a relatively small impact on QOL compared with dietary therapy. Adherence to potassium binders was high.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Concurrent use of RAAS inhibitors and potassium binders was common, consistent with a role for binders in supporting RAAS inhibitor continuation. Potassium binders showed little perceived impact, indicating that pharmacologic potassium control may be acceptable to patients managing multiple lifestyle limitations.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05297409).</p>","PeriodicalId":10349,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-026-02951-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hyperkalemia is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and chronic heart failure (CHF), often leading to treatment dilemmas regarding renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors. Although potassium binders and dietary restrictions are central to chronic management, their quality-of-life (QOL) impact remains insufficiently described. This study aimed to characterize real-world treatment patterns and evaluate treatment impact on QOL.

Methods: We analyzed baseline data from a prospective cohort in Japanese nephrology and cardiology outpatient clinics. Participants were adults with CKD (≥ stage G3) or CHF (New York Heart Association class II-IV) who initiated potassium binders within 6 months. Clinical data, serum potassium values, and patient-reported outcomes (generic QOL, disease/treatment-specific QOL, and adherence measures) were obtained at enrollment.

Results: Among 347 patients, the median age was 75 years, and 74% were male; 93% had CKD. At enrollment, 59% were prescribed a RAAS inhibitor. Dietary therapy was implemented in 29%. Physical scores of generic QOL were lower than population norms, whereas mental scores were comparable. Treatment-specific QOL scores suggested that potassium binders may have had a relatively small impact on QOL compared with dietary therapy. Adherence to potassium binders was high.

Conclusions: Concurrent use of RAAS inhibitors and potassium binders was common, consistent with a role for binders in supporting RAAS inhibitor continuation. Potassium binders showed little perceived impact, indicating that pharmacologic potassium control may be acceptable to patients managing multiple lifestyle limitations.

Study registration: The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05297409).

高钾血症患者的生活质量:日本慢性肾病或心力衰竭患者高钾血症管理队列研究的基线分析
背景:高钾血症在慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)和慢性心力衰竭(CHF)中很常见,经常导致肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统(RAAS)抑制剂的治疗困境。虽然钾结合剂和饮食限制是慢性治疗的核心,但它们对生活质量(QOL)的影响仍然没有得到充分的描述。本研究旨在描述现实世界的治疗模式,并评估治疗对生活质量的影响。方法:我们分析了来自日本肾病学和心脏病学门诊的前瞻性队列的基线数据。参与者是患有CKD(≥G3期)或CHF(纽约心脏协会II-IV级)的成年人,他们在6个月内开始使用钾结合剂。在入组时获得临床数据、血清钾值和患者报告的结果(一般生活质量、疾病/治疗特异性生活质量和依从性措施)。结果:347例患者中位年龄为75岁,男性占74%;93%为慢性肾病。入组时,59%的患者服用RAAS抑制剂。29%的患者采用饮食疗法。一般生活质量的身体得分低于人群正常值,而心理得分具有可比性。治疗特异性生活质量评分表明,与饮食治疗相比,钾结合剂对生活质量的影响可能相对较小。对钾结合剂的粘附性高。结论:同时使用RAAS抑制剂和钾结合剂是常见的,这与结合剂在支持RAAS抑制剂持续治疗中的作用是一致的。钾结合剂的影响不大,这表明药物控制钾对于多种生活方式限制的患者是可以接受的。研究注册:该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT05297409)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Nephrology is a peer-reviewed monthly journal, officially published by the Japanese Society of Nephrology (JSN) to provide an international forum for the discussion of research and issues relating to the study of nephrology. Out of respect for the founders of the JSN, the title of this journal uses the term “nephrology,” a word created and brought into use with the establishment of the JSN (Japanese Journal of Nephrology, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1960). The journal publishes articles on all aspects of nephrology, including basic, experimental, and clinical research, so as to share the latest research findings and ideas not only with members of the JSN, but with all researchers who wish to contribute to a better understanding of recent advances in nephrology. The journal is unique in that it introduces to an international readership original reports from Japan and also the clinical standards discussed and agreed by JSN.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书